Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Observational Study
. 2025 Jan;12(1):e70139.
doi: 10.1002/nop2.70139.

Errors Associated With Medication Administration by a Nurse During Hospitalisation: A Prospective Observational Multicentric Study

Affiliations
Observational Study

Errors Associated With Medication Administration by a Nurse During Hospitalisation: A Prospective Observational Multicentric Study

Ondrej Tesar et al. Nurs Open. 2025 Jan.

Abstract

Aims: To explore all medication administration errors (MAEs) throughout the entire process of medication administration by nurses in the inpatient setting, to describe their prevalence, and to analyse associated factors, including deviation from the good practice standards.

Background: Worldwide, MAEs are very common and regarded as a serious risk factor to inpatient safety. Nurses assume an essential role in the hospital setting during the administration of medications.

Design: The prospective observational study was carried out in accordance with the STROBE guidance.

Methods: This study was conducted in four regional hospitals from June to August 2021. MAEs were collected when nurses administered medications to the adult inpatients during the morning, noon, and evening medication rounds at the internal, surgical, and follow-up care departments in each hospital over three consecutive days. Direct observation by the multidisciplinary team was employed. MAEs were classified as major MAEs (from the potentially most serious and common to all drug forms), specific MAEs (specific to a drug form), and procedural MAEs (e.g., patient identification, hygiene standards, or generic drug substitution). Predictors of either major MAE or specific MAE frequency were analysed using the generalised linear model and the decision tree model.

Results: Overall, 58 nurses administering medication to 331 inpatients at 12 departments were observed. In total, 6356 medication administrations were observed, of which 461 comprised major MAEs, 1497 specific MAEs, and 12,045 procedural MAEs. The predictors of the occurrence of major MAEs and specific MAEs were the specific hospital, the nurse's length of practice (less than 2 years), and two procedural MAEs (the unclear prescription and the wrong strength).

Conclusions: Non-adherence to the standard processes in healthcare facilities for prescribing and administering drugs increased the prevalence of severe MAEs. Determinants of MAE occurrence such as incorrect prescriptions or limited experience of nurses should be considered.

Implication for the profession and patient care: The identified determinants of MAE should be considered by hospital stakeholders in their support programs to reduce the level of burden for nurses during medication administration.

Patient or public contribution: Neither patients nor public was not involved in the design, data collection, or dissemination plans of this study. The researchers observed nurse care delivery at medical departments acting as passive participants.

Keywords: inpatient; medication administration; medication error; multidisciplinary team; nurse; patient safety.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Association between major MAE occurrence and procedural MAE occurrence (decision tree model). +/− mMAE, number of MA with/without any major MAE; CI, confidence interval; MA, medication administrations in current subgroup (excluding omissions); MAE, medication administration error; n, number; N/A, not applicable; OR, odds ratio. Current subgroup was split in accordance with the presence of an individual procedural MAE (decision). Those subgroups were compared with a major MAE occurrence then. Subgroups were split up to 3 levels. All associations are statically significant (p‐value < 0.05). For procedural MAE definitions see Table 1.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Agnieszka, W. , Paweł P., and Małgorzata K.. 2022. “How to Optimize the Effectiveness and Safety of Parkinson's Disease Therapy? – A Systematic Review of Drugs Interactions With Food and Dietary Supplements.” Current Neuropharmacology 20, no. 7: 1427–1447. 10.2174/1570159x19666211116142806. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Al Tehewy, M. , Fahim H., Gad N. I., El Gafary M., and Rahman S. A.. 2016. “Medication Administration Errors in a University Hospital.” Journal of Patient Safety 12, no. 1: 34–39. 10.1097/pts.0000000000000196. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ambrose, P. G. , Bhavnani S. M., Rubino C. M., et al. 2007. “Pharmacokinetics‐Pharmacodynamics of Antimicrobial Therapy: It's Not Just for Mice Anymore.” Clinical Infectious Diseases 44, no. 1: 79–86. 10.1086/510079. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Azar, C. , Raffoul P., Rizk R., Boutros C., Saleh N., and Maison P.. 2023. “Prevalence of Medication Administration Errors in Hospitalized Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis up to 2017 to Explore Sources of Heterogeneity.” Fundamental & Clinical Pharmacology 37, no. 3: 531–548. 10.1111/fcp.12873. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Barrett, J. , Worth E., Bauss F., and Epstein S.. 2004. “Ibandronate: A Clinical Pharmacological and Pharmacokinetic Update.” Journal of Clinical Pharmacology 44, no. 9: 951–965. 10.1177/0091270004267594. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources