Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Jan 10;53(1):22.
doi: 10.1007/s00240-025-01691-7.

Renal pelvis pressure and flowrate with a multi-channel ureteroscope: invoking the concept of outflow resistance

Anthony F Bonzagni  1 , Timothy L Hall  2 , Khurshid R Ghani  3 , William W Roberts  3
Affiliations

Renal pelvis pressure and flowrate with a multi-channel ureteroscope: invoking the concept of outflow resistance

Anthony F Bonzagni et al. Urolithiasis. .

Abstract

Understanding renal pelvis pressure (PRP) during ureteroscopy (URS) has become increasingly important. High irrigation rates, desirable to maintain visualization and limit thermal dose, can increase PRP. Use of a multi-channel ureteroscope (m-ureteroscope) with a dedicated drainage channel is one strategy that may facilitate simultaneous low PRP and high flowrate. We sought to define the relationship between PRP and flowrate across a range of different outflow resistance scenarios with an m-ureteroscope versus a single-channel ureteroscope (s-ureteroscope). The m- or s-ureteroscope was placed into the pelvis of a validated silicone kidney-ureter model. Trials were conducted at irrigation pressures (50-150 cmH20) and five different outflow resistance scenarios simulated with catheters of different lengths and diameters. PRP was measured with a fiber optic pressure sensor positioned in the renal pelvis. Flowrate was determined by measuring the mass of drainage fluid over 60 s. PRP was lower with the m-ureteroscope than the s-ureteroscope when equivalent flowrates were delivered (i.e. 34 vs. 82 cmH20 respectively with 15 ml/min irrigation in a high outflow resistance scenario). Flowrate was higher with the m-ureteroscope than the s-ureteroscope when equivalent irrigation pressures were applied (i.e. 28 vs. 14 ml/min respectively with irrigation pressure 150 cmH20 in a high outflow resistance scenario). The m-ureteroscope has improved pressure-flow dynamics imparting important clinical benefits. More importantly, this approach to framing ureteroscopy in the context of pressure-flow relationships related by resistance values allows quantification of ureteroscopy within a deterministic system, which can be used to streamline future device development and technological innovation.

Keywords: Flowrate; Irrigation rate; Multi-channel ureteroscope; Outflow resistance; Renal pelvis pressure.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations. Conflict of interest: WW Roberts has a consulting relationship with Boston Scientific. KR Ghani has a consulting relationships with Boston Scientific, Olympus, Coloplast, Karl Storz, Ambu, Lumibird. AF Bonzagni, TL Hall have no disclosures.

References

    1. Dauw CA, Simeon L, Alruwaily AF et al (2015) Contemporary practice patterns of flexible ureteroscopy for treating renal stones: results of a worldwide survey. J Endourol 29(11):1221–1230. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2015.0260 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Oberlin DT, Flum AS, Bachrach L et al (2015) Contemporary surgical trends in the management of upper tract calculi. J Urol 193(3):880–884. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2014.09.006 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kronenberg P, Somani B (2018) Advances in lasers for the treatment of stones—a systematic review. Curr Urol Rep 19(6):45. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11934-018-0807-y . (published 2018 May 17) - DOI - PubMed - PMC
    1. Zhong W, Leto G, Wang L et al (2015) Systemic inflammatory response syndrome after flexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy: a study of risk factors. J Endourol 29(1):25–28. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2014.0409 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Zhong W, Zeng G, Wu K et al (2008) Does a smaller tract in percutaneous nephrolithotomy contribute to high renal pelvic pressure and postoperative fever? J Endourol 22(9):2147–2151. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2008.0001 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources