Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Dec 20:jme-2024-110105.
doi: 10.1136/jme-2024-110105. Online ahead of print.

Scaffolding informed consent

Affiliations

Scaffolding informed consent

Dominic Wilkinson et al. J Med Ethics. .

Abstract

The principle of respecting patient autonomy underpins the concept and practice of informed consent. Yet current approaches to consent often ignore the ways in which the exercise of autonomy is deeply epistemically dependent.In this paper, we draw on philosophical descriptions of autonomy 'scaffolding' and apply them to informed consent in medicine. We examine how this relates to other models of the doctor-patient relationship and other theories (eg, the notion of relational autonomy). A focus on scaffolding autonomy reframes the justification for existing ways of supporting decisions. In other cases, it suggests a need to rethink how, when and where professionals obtain consent. It may highlight the benefit of technology for supporting decisions.Finally, we consider the implications for some high-stakes decisions where autonomy is thought to be critical, for example, termination of pregnancy. We argue that such decisions should not be free from all sources of influence-rather they should be protected from undesired influence.

Keywords: Informed Consent; Personal Autonomy; Philosophy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

References

    1. Beauchamp TL, Childress JF. Principles of biomedical ethics. Oxford University Press; 2001.
    1. Engelhardt HT. The many faces of autonomy. Health Care Anal. 2001;9:283–97. - PubMed
    1. O’Neill O. Autonomy and trust in bioethics. Cambridge University Press; 2002.
    1. DeGrazia D, Millum J. A theory of bioethics. Cambridge University Press; Cambridge: 2021.
    1. Pugh J. Autonomy, rationality, and contemporary bioethics. Oxford University Press; Oxford (UK): 2020. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources