Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Dec 26;15(1):29.
doi: 10.3390/diagnostics15010029.

Comparison of Non-Contrast CT vs. Contrast-Enhanced CT with Both Intravenous and Rectal Contrast Application for Diagnosis of Acute Colonic Diverticulitis: A Multireader, Retrospective Single-Center Study

Dorottya Móré  1 , Stella Erdmann  2 , Arved Bischoff  1 , Verena Wagner  1 , Hans-Ulrich Kauczor  1 , Lukas F Liesenfeld  3 , Katharina Abbasi Dezfouli  1 , Athanasios Giannakis  1 , Miriam Klauß  1 , Philipp Mayer  1
Affiliations

Comparison of Non-Contrast CT vs. Contrast-Enhanced CT with Both Intravenous and Rectal Contrast Application for Diagnosis of Acute Colonic Diverticulitis: A Multireader, Retrospective Single-Center Study

Dorottya Móré et al. Diagnostics (Basel). .

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate the non-inferiority of non-contrast CT compared to contrast-enhanced CT with both intravenous and rectal contrast application for the diagnosis of acute colonic diverticulitis. Methods: Five readers retrospectively evaluated the non-contrast and contrast-enhanced series of CTs of 205 consecutive patients with clinical suspicion of acute diverticulitis. Two randomized reading sessions, both containing all 205 cases as either contrast-enhanced or non-contrast (1:1) series, were performed with ≥8 weeks washout between them. The non-inferiority margin was set to 0.1. Results: The pooled prevalence (all readers) of diverticulitis was similar for non-contrast CT (63.9%, range: 60.5-65.0%) and contrast-enhanced CT (64.4%, 61.5-67.8%). Non-contrast CT was non-inferior for the diagnosis of diverticulitis (accuracy 0.90 [95% confidence interval: 0.89, 0.92]) compared to contrast-enhanced CT (0.92 [0.90, 0.94]; the difference in accuracy: -0.01 [-0.04, 0.01]) (normal deviate test: p-valueone-sided = 5.20 × 10-6). Sensitivities for perforation and abscess were slightly but significantly lower for the non-contrast CT than for the contrast-enhanced CT (differences: -0.15 [-0.20, -0.05], -0.17 [-0.27, -0.07]), while no differences in accuracies and specificities were observed. Conclusions: Non-contrast CT is non-inferior to contrast-enhanced CT (intravenous and rectal contrast) for the diagnosis of acute colonic diverticulitis. Contrast-enhanced CT is associated with significantly higher sensitivities for the presence of an abscess or perforation.

Keywords: colonic diverticulitis; computed tomography; contrast enema; non-contrast computed tomography; reader study.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flowchart of the patient population.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Study design for readings and reference standards.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Bar chart showing the reader performance for diagnosing colonic diverticulitis in non-contrast and contrast-enhanced CT. The bars indicate accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity values for all readers (whiskers: 95% confidence intervals, CI). The lines indicate individual reader values: dark red and red (R1 and R2): board-certified radiologists; medium, dark, and light blue (R3, R4, R5): residents. Below the bars are the differences in accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity (with 95% CI). Note that the CIs of all differences shown include the 0.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Examples of diverticulitis cases without and with complications. Upper row: representative non-contrast CTs; bottom row: corresponding contrast-enhanced CT images. The number of accurate readings is given below each CT image. Left: In most cases, colonic diverticulitis was correctly diagnosed both in non-contrast and contrast-enhanced CT (arrow: thickened diverticulum with surrounding fat stranding). Middle left: Difficult case where diverticulitis was missed in non-contrast CT by the majority of readers (arrow: thickened segment of sigmoid colon with pericolic fat stranding). Middle right: The sensitivity for abscesses was slightly lower for non-contrast compared to contrast-enhanced CT (arrow: deep pelvic abscess). Right: Free peritoneal perforations were usually correctly diagnosed both in non-contrast and contrast-enhanced CT (arrow: free perihepatic air bubbles).
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Bharucha A.E., Parthasarathy G., Ditah I., Fletcher J.G., Ewelukwa O., Pendlimari R., Yawn B.P., Melton J.L., Schleck C., Zinsmeister A.R. Temporal Trends in the Incidence and Natural History of Diverticulitis: A Population-Based Study. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 2015;110:1589–1596. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2015.302. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Vennix S., Morton D.G., Hahnloser D., Lange J.F., Bemelman W.A., The Research Committee of the European Society of Coloproctocology Systematic Review of Evidence and Consensus on Diverticulitis: An Analysis of National and International Guidelines. Color. Dis. 2014;16:866–878. doi: 10.1111/codi.12659. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Andersen J.C., Bundgaard L., Elbrønd H., Laurberg S., Walker L.R., Støvring J., Danish Surgical Society Danish National Guidelines for Treatment of Diverticular Disease. Dan. Med. J. 2012;59:C4453. - PubMed
    1. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) Diverticular Disease: Diagnosis and Management. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE); London, UK: 2019. NG 147. - PubMed
    1. Schultz J.K., Azhar N., Binda G.A., Barbara G., Biondo S., Boermeester M.A., Chabok A., Consten E.C.J., Van Dijk S.T., Johanssen A., et al. European Society of Coloproctology: Guidelines for the Management of Diverticular Disease of the Colon. Color. Dis. 2020;22:5–28. doi: 10.1111/codi.15140. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources