Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Dec 27;14(1):55.
doi: 10.3390/foods14010055.

Comparative Analysis of Biochemical Parameters, Thermal Behavior, Rheological Features, and Gelling Characteristics of Thai Ligor Hybrid Chicken and Broiler Meats

Affiliations

Comparative Analysis of Biochemical Parameters, Thermal Behavior, Rheological Features, and Gelling Characteristics of Thai Ligor Hybrid Chicken and Broiler Meats

Ngassa Julius Mussa et al. Foods. .

Abstract

Genetic differences typically cause differences in the structure and function of proteins in meat. The objective of this research was to examine the biochemical characteristics and functional behavior of proteins in fresh composite meat from Thai Ligor hybrid chicken (LC) and commercial broiler chicken (BC). The composite meat samples, which comprise minced breast and thigh without skin from 20 chicken carcasses in a 1:1 (w/w) ratio, were randomly selected for analysis using the completely randomized design (CRD). Results showed that BC meat exhibited higher ultimate pH after 24 h, Ca2+-ATPase activity, and trichloroacetic acid (TCA)-soluble peptide content compared to LC meat (p < 0.05). While both meat types showed non-significant differences in reactive sulfhydryl (SH) levels (p > 0.05), LC meat exhibited higher hydrophobicity compared to BC meat (p < 0.05). Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) analysis revealed a single transition peak in all samples. LC meat exhibited higher thermal stability than BC meat, with transition peaks at 91 °C and 81 °C, respectively, in non-sodium chloride (NaCl) treated samples. Samples treated with 2.5% NaCl exhibited transition peaks around 70 °C for BC and 79 °C for LC. LC meat showed higher storage modulus (G') and loss modulus (G″) values than BC meat, suggesting a stronger gel-forming tendency. LC meat gels exhibited higher hardness, cohesiveness, gumminess, and chewiness, and a slightly lower pH (6.14 vs. 5.97) compared to BC meat gels (p < 0.05). LC meat gels displayed larger expressible moisture content (p < 0.05), although the value was approximately 6%. Compared to LC meat gels, BC meat gels appeared slightly whiter (p < 0.05). To compare the lipid oxidation of BC and LC meat gels day by day, the thiobarbituric acid reactive substances (TBARS) of gels stored at 4 °C in polyethylene bags were measured on Days 0, 4, and 8. Both BC and LC meat gels showed acceptable lipid oxidation-based rancid off-flavor after short-term storage at 4 °C, with TBARS values below 2 mg malondialdehyde (MDA) equivalent/kg on Day 8. Understanding these variations in biochemical properties and functional behavior can help optimize processing methods and produce meat products of superior quality that meet consumer preferences.

Keywords: chicken; gel; hybrid; meat; quality.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Carcasses of Ligor chicken (LC; (a)) and broiler chicken (BC; (b)).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) thermograms of Ligor chicken (LC) meat and broiler chicken (BC) meat without NaCl (a) and with 2.5% (w/w) NaCl (b).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) thermograms of Ligor chicken (LC) meat and broiler chicken (BC) meat without NaCl (a) and with 2.5% (w/w) NaCl (b).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Rheological behaviors, including storage modulus (G′) and loss modulus (G″) of Ligor chicken meat paste (●) and broiler chicken meat paste (○) without NaCl (a,c) and with 2.5% (w/w) NaCl (b,d).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Alsubhi M., Blake M., Nguyen T., Majmudar I., Moodie M., Ananthapavan J. Consumer willingness to pay for healthier food products: A systematic review. Obes. Rev. 2023;24:e13525. doi: 10.1111/obr.13525. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Xu C., Yin Z. Unraveling the flavor profiles of chicken meat: Classes, biosynthesis, influencing factors in flavor development, and sensory evaluation. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 2024;23:e13391. doi: 10.1111/1541-4337.13391. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Panpipat W., Chaijan M., Karnjanapratum S., Keawtong P., Tansakul P., Panya A., Phonsatta N., Aoumtes K., Quan T.H., Petcharat T. Quality characterization of different parts of broiler and Ligor hybrid chickens. Foods. 2022;11:1929. doi: 10.3390/foods11131929. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Katemala S., Molee A., Thumanu K., Yongsawatdigul J. Meat quality and Raman spectroscopic characterization of Korat hybrid chicken obtained from various rearing periods. Poult. Sci. 2021;100:1248–1261. doi: 10.1016/j.psj.2020.10.027. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Jaturasitha S., Chaiwang N., Kreuzer M. Thai native chicken meat: An option to meet the demands for specific meat quality by certain groups of consumers: A review. Anim. Prod. Sci. 2017;57:1582–1587. doi: 10.1071/AN15646. - DOI

LinkOut - more resources