Vitamin D Supplementation in Critically Ill-Narrative Review
- PMID: 39796590
- PMCID: PMC11723408
- DOI: 10.3390/nu17010156
Vitamin D Supplementation in Critically Ill-Narrative Review
Abstract
Background: Studies have shown a high prevalence of vitamin D deficiency in critically ill patients, and these patients are at higher risk for pneumonia and have increased incidence of sepsis and mortality. In this study, we reviewed available literature from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on vitamin D supplementation in critically ill patients and summarized the evidence in this narrative review.
Methods: Randomized controlled trials that included vitamin D supplementation as an intervention were eligible for inclusion. No limits were set regarding vitamin D dosage or route of administration, as well as for primary and secondary outcomes. A search was conducted in MEDLINE via PubMed for eligible RCTs. References from systematic reviews (SRs) and meta-analyses (MAs) were screened, and Clinicaltrials.gov was searched for ongoing studies.
Results: A total of 21 RCTs involving 3166 patients were analyzed. There was a large heterogeneity in terms of patients' characteristics and inclusion criteria. Only six studies included patients with vitamin D levels < 50 nmol/L. Regarding clinically important outcomes, most of the studies did not show differences between the intervention and control group in terms of mortality, intensive care unit (ICU) or hospital length of stay (LoS).
Conclusions: There is great variability in trial designs regarding the selection of patients, dosage, dosing intervals and routes of administration of vitamin D supplements. Better study designs are mandatory for future clinical research, with measuring and reporting basal vitamin D levels before randomization. Since variability in supplementation regimes limits the possibility of data synthesis, standardized protocols for vitamin D supplementation should be used in clinical trial settings.
Keywords: ICU; critically ill; supplementation; vitamin D.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Figures


Similar articles
-
Evaluation of Vitamin D Supplementation in Critically Ill Patients-A Narrative Review of Randomized Controlled Trials Published in the Last 5 Years.Nutrients. 2025 Feb 27;17(5):816. doi: 10.3390/nu17050816. Nutrients. 2025. PMID: 40077686 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Vitamin D supplementation during intensive care unit stay is associated with improved outcomes in critically Ill patients with sepsis: a cohort study.Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2025 Jan 20;14:1485554. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2024.1485554. eCollection 2024. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2025. PMID: 39902186 Free PMC article.
-
Vitamin D supplementation in the critically ill: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Clin Nutr. 2018 Aug;37(4):1238-1246. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2017.05.006. Epub 2017 May 11. Clin Nutr. 2018. PMID: 28549527
-
Vitamin D supplementation for managing COVID-19 in patients with vitamin D deficiency: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.BMJ Open. 2025 Mar 26;15(3):e091903. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-091903. BMJ Open. 2025. PMID: 40139702 Free PMC article.
-
Vitamin D supplementation and the outcomes of critically ill adult patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Sci Rep. 2020 Aug 31;10(1):14261. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-71271-9. Sci Rep. 2020. PMID: 32868842 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Two-phase linear relationship of Vitamin D and Vitamin A among children aged 0-14 years: a cross-sectional study.Front Nutr. 2025 Apr 1;12:1539590. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2025.1539590. eCollection 2025. Front Nutr. 2025. PMID: 40236634 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Zajic P., Amrein K. Vitamin D deficiency in the ICU: A systematic review. Minerva Endocrinol. 2014;39:275–287. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical