Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Dec 30;17(1):88.
doi: 10.3390/cancers17010088.

Factors Influencing the Duration of Maintenance Therapy in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

Affiliations

Factors Influencing the Duration of Maintenance Therapy in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

Théo Fourrier et al. Cancers (Basel). .

Abstract

Background/objectives: Metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) is mainly treated with 5-Fluoro-Uracil (5-FU), Oxaliplatin and Irinotecan chemotherapies and anti-Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) or anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF) targeted therapies. Due to chemotherapy-related toxicity, patients receive induction treatment to achieve tumour response followed by maintenance therapy with less cytotoxic molecules or a chemotherapy-free interval to reduce chemotherapy-related toxicity. In this study, the aim was to determine the patient, cancer and treatment factors that influence the duration of maintenance therapy (DMT).

Methods: We collected retrospective data on a cohort of 133 patients treated at the Centre Georges François Leclerc (CGFL) cancer centre in Dijon between March 2014 and June 2022. Patients had unresectable or potentially resectable diseases. They received first-line induction treatment with chemotherapy and/or targeted therapy and maintenance treatment, defined as the interruption of at least one chemotherapy agent.

Results: In the multivariate analysis, age (HR: 1.02, 95% CI 1.00-1.04, p = 0.031), N2 nodal status (HR: 1.78, 95% CI 1.09-2.89, p = 0.021) and the presence of peritoneal metastases (HR: 2.05, 95% CI 1.25-3.36, p = 0.004), as well as baseline carcino-embryonic antigen (CEA) level (HR: 1.10, 95% CI 1.00-1.20, p = 0.052), were significantly associated to poor DMT. Local treatment of liver metastases also significantly reduced the DMT (HR: 0.49, 95% CI 0.28-0.86, p = 0.013). In our cohort, induction triplet chemotherapy significantly increased the CEA delta (70% vs. 44%, p = 0.047) compared to doublet chemotherapy and led to a higher rate of liver surgery (40% vs. 21%, p = 0.014) and a trend for a higher rate of local treatment of metastases (62% vs. 45%, p = 0.059).

Conclusions: Duration of maintenance therapy is determined by the initial patient and colorectal cancer characteristics. However, it is significantly increased by local treatment of liver metastases. By reducing the tumour burden, a triplet induction chemotherapy regimen increases the rate of liver metastase resection.

Keywords: chemotherapy; induction treatment; maintenance treatment; metastatic colorectal cancer; targeted therapies.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
(a) Kaplan-Meier curve of the DMT depending on the induction chemotherapy regimen; (b) Kaplan-Meier curve of PFS depending on the induction chemotherapy regimen; (c) Kaplan-Meier curve of OS depending on the induction chemotherapy regimen.
Figure 2
Figure 2
(a) Kaplan-Meier curve of the DMT depending on the maintenance chemotherapy regimen; (b) Kaplan-Meier curve of PFS depending on the maintenance chemotherapy regimen; (c) Kaplan-Meier curve of PFS depending on the maintenance chemotherapy regimen.
Figure 3
Figure 3
(a) Kaplan-Meier curve of the DMT depending on DPYD status; (b) Kaplan-Meier curve of the PFS depending on DPYD status; (c) Kaplan-Meier curve of the OS depending on DPYD status.
Figure 4
Figure 4
(a) Kaplan-Meier curve of the DMT depending on UGT1A1 status; (b) Kaplan-Meier curve of PFS depending on UGT1A1 status; (c) Kaplan-Meier curve of OS depending on UGT1A1 status.

References

    1. Sung H., Ferlay J., Siegel R.L., Laversanne M., Soerjomataram I., Jemal A., Bray F. Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries. CA Cancer J. Clin. 2021;71:209–249. doi: 10.3322/caac.21660. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kopetz S., Chang G.J., Overman M.J., Eng C., Sargent D.J., Larson D.W., Grothey A., Vauthey J.-N., Nagorney D.M., McWilliams R.R. Improved survival in metastatic colorectal cancer is associated with adoption of hepatic resection and improved chemotherapy. J. Clin. Oncol. Off. J. Am. Soc. Clin. Oncol. 2009;27:3677–3683. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2008.20.5278. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cervantes A., Adam R., Roselló S., Arnold D., Normanno N., Taïeb J., Seligmann J., De Baere T., Osterlund P., Yoshino T., et al. Metastatic colorectal cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guideline for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann. Oncol. Off. J. Eur. Soc. Med. Oncol. 2023;34:10–32. doi: 10.1016/j.annonc.2022.10.003. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Meta-analysis Group In Cancer. Piedbois P., Rougier P., Buyse M., Pignon J., Ryan L., Hansen R., Zee B., Weinerman B., Pater J., et al. Efficacy of intravenous continuous infusion of fluorouracil compared with bolus administration in advanced colorectal cancer. J. Clin. Oncol. Off. J. Am. Soc. Clin. Oncol. 1998;16:301–308. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1998.16.1.301. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Douillard J.Y., Cunningham D., Roth A.D., Navarro M., James R.D., Karasek P., Jandik P., Iveson T., Carmichael J., Alakl M., et al. Irinotecan combined with fluorouracil compared with fluorouracil alone as first-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer: A multicentre randomised trial. Lancet. 2000;355:1041–1047. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(00)02034-1. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources