Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2024 Dec 22;12(6):e004428.
doi: 10.1136/bmjdrc-2024-004428.

Six months of hybrid closed-loop therapy improves diabetes-specific positive well-being, and reduces diabetes distress and fear of hypoglycemia: secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial

Collaborators, Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Six months of hybrid closed-loop therapy improves diabetes-specific positive well-being, and reduces diabetes distress and fear of hypoglycemia: secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial

Jennifer A Halliday et al. BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care. .

Abstract

Introduction: This analysis aimed to investigate diabetes-specific psychological outcomes among adults with type 1 diabetes (T1D) using hybrid closed-loop (HCL) versus standard therapy.

Research design and methods: In this multicenter, open-label, randomized, controlled, parallel-group clinical trial, adults with T1D were allocated to 26 weeks of HCL (MiniMed™ 670G) or standard therapy (insulin pump or multiple daily injections without real-time continuous glucose monitoring). Psychological outcomes (awareness and fear of hypoglycemia; and diabetes-specific positive well-being, diabetes distress, diabetes treatment satisfaction, and diabetes-specific quality of life (QoL)) were measured at enrollment, mid-trial and end-trial. Linear mixed models were conducted, using restricted maximum likelihood estimation, unadjusted and adjusted (for covariates: age, sex, diabetes duration, glycated hemoglobin, recent severe hypoglycemia, pre-trial insulin delivery modality, enrollment and mid-study scores).

Results: 120 participants (mean age 44±12 years) were randomized to intervention (n=61) or standard therapy (n=59). At 13 weeks, the HCL group had better diabetes-specific positive well-being than the standard therapy group (unadjusted: Δ=1.0, p=0.025; adjusted: Δ=1.1, p=0.01), which was maintained at 26 weeks (unadjusted: Δ=0.9, p=0.042; adjusted: Δ=1.0, p=0.023). At 26 weeks, the HCL group also had less diabetes distress (adjusted: Δ=-6.4, p=0.039), fear of hypoglycemia ("maintain high": adjusted: Δ=-0.8, p=0.034; and "worry": adjusted: Δ=-1.8, p=0.048), and perceived "unacceptably high glucose levels" (unadjusted: Δ=-1.1, p<0.001; adjusted: Δ=-1.1, p<0.001). HCL did not improve diabetes treatment satisfaction, diabetes-specific QoL, hypoglycemia awareness, or perceived frequency of unacceptably low glucose levels.

Conclusions: These findings imply that HCL offers important psychological benefits. In particular, improvement in diabetes-specific positive well-being was observed 13 weeks after HCL initiation and maintained at 26 weeks. Reduction in the perceived frequency of hyperglycemia was also apparent by 26 weeks. Adjusted analyses showed significant reductions in diabetes distress and fear of hypoglycemia at 26 weeks, suggesting these benefits were apparent for people with particular characteristics.

Trial registration number: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry: ACTRN12617000520336.

Keywords: Artificial Pancreas; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1; Patient Reported Outcome Measures.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: JAH reports speaker honoraria from Roche Diabetes Care. SAM reports support for research from Medtronic, speaker honoraria from Eli Lilly, Roche and Sanofi, and serving on advisory boards for Medtronic and Ypsomed. ST reports non-financial support from Abbott Diabetes Care. BP reports speaker honoraria fees from Medtronic. LAB reports grant funding from AstraZeneca. NDC reports personal fees from Medtronic and Abbott Laboratories and grant funds from Ypsomed Group. AJJ has received research support from Medtronic, Sanofi, Abbott Laboratories, and Mylan and has served on advisory boards for Medtronic, Sanofi, and Abbott Diabetes Care. JK reports speaker fees from Novo Nordisk and AstraZeneca and advisory board fees from Abbott Diabetes Care. MHL reports speaker honoraria from Medtronic. BP reports speaker honoraria fees from Medtronic. DO has served on advisory boards for Abbott Laboratories, Medtronic, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novo Nordisk, Roche, and Sanofi; received research support from Medtronic, Novo Nordisk, Roche, Eli Lilly and Company, and Sanofi; and received travel support from Novo Nordisk and Merck Sharp & Dohme. JS has served on advisory boards for Insulet, Medtronic, Roche Diabetes Care, and Sanofi Diabetes; her research group (The Australian Centre for Behavioural Research in Diabetes) has received honoraria for this advisory board participation and has also received unrestricted educational grants and/or in-kind support from Abbott Diabetes Care, AstraZeneca, Medtronic, Roche Diabetes Care, and Sanofi Diabetes; has received sponsorship to attend educational meetings from Medtronic, Roche Diabetes Care, and Sanofi Diabetes; and has received consultancy income or speaker fees from Abbott Diabetes Care, AstraZeneca, Medtronic, Novo Nordisk, Roche Diabetes Care, and Sanofi Diabetes. The remaining authors do not report any potential conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Study overview. CGM, continuous glucose monitor; CSII, continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion; HbA1c, glycated hemoglobin; HCL, hybrid closed-loop; MDI, multiple daily insulin injections; SMS, short messaging service.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Study flow diagram. CGM, continuous glucose monitor; HCL, hybrid closed-loop.

References

    1. American Association of Diabetes Educators (AADE) An effective model of diabetes care and education: revising the AADE7 Self-Care Behaviors®. Diabetes Educ. 2020;46:139–60. doi: 10.1177/0145721719894903. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Litterbach E, Holmes-Truscott E, Pouwer F, et al. 'I wish my health professionals understood that it’s not just all about your HbA1c !'. Qualitative responses from the second Diabetes MILES - Australia (MILES-2) study. Diabet Med. 2020;37:971–81. doi: 10.1111/dme.14199. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Barnard KD, Hood KK, Weissberg-Benchell J, et al. Psychosocial assessment of artificial pancreas (AP): commentary and review of existing measures and their applicability in AP research. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2015;17:295–300. doi: 10.1089/dia.2014.0305. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Gonder-Frederick LA, Grabman JH, Shepard JA. Human Factor Considerations for Artificial Pancreas Research. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2016;18:762–4. doi: 10.1089/dia.2016.0403. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Abraham MB, de Bock M, Smith GJ, et al. Effect of a Hybrid Closed-Loop System on Glycemic and Psychosocial Outcomes in Children and Adolescents With Type 1 Diabetes: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Pediatr. 2021;175:1227–35. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2021.3965. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources