Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Mar;51(3):199-210.
doi: 10.1016/j.jcjq.2024.11.009. Epub 2024 Nov 28.

Simulation-Based Clinical System Testing of Neonatal Resuscitation Readiness Across a Rural Health System Identifies Common Latent Safety Threats

Simulation-Based Clinical System Testing of Neonatal Resuscitation Readiness Across a Rural Health System Identifies Common Latent Safety Threats

Jeffrey Holmes et al. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2025 Mar.

Abstract

Background: Simulation offers an opportunity to practice neonatal resuscitation and test clinical systems to improve safety. The authors used simulation-based clinical systems testing (SbCST) with a Healthcare Failure Mode and Effect Analysis (HFMEA) rubric to categorize and quantify latent safety threats (LSTs) during in situ training in eight rural delivery hospitals. The research team hypothesized that most LSTs would be common across hospitals. LST themes were identified across sites.

Methods: Between May 2019 and May 2023, the neonatal simulation team conducted half-day training sessions including a total of 177 interprofessional delivery room team members. Teams participated in skills stations, followed by in situ simulations with facilitated debriefs. Facilitators included neonatologists and simulation faculty trained in HFMEA. HFMEA rubrics were completed for each site with mitigation strategies captured on follow-up. LSTs were compared across sites.

Results: A total of 67 distinct LSTs were identified. Forty-one of 67 (61.2%) were shared by more than one hospital, and 26 (38.8%) were unique to individual hospitals. LSTs were distributed across five systems categories and three teams categories. The 4 LSTs detected at 75% or more of hospitals were lack of clear newborn blood transfusion protocols, inconsistent use of closed-loop communication, inconsistent processes for accessing additional resources, and inconsistent use of a recorder.

Conclusion: Use of SbCST across a health system allows for comparison of LSTs at each site and identification of common opportunities to mitigate safety threats. Systemwide analysis provides leaders with data needed to guide resource allocation to track and ensure effective implementation of solutions for prioritized LSTs. Identification of themes may allow other hospitals that have not participated in simulation testing to engage in prospective readiness efforts.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Phrampus PE. “Simulation and integration into patient safety systems.” Simulation in Healthcare 13.4 (2018): 225–226. - PubMed
    1. Colman N, Doughty C, Arnold J, et al. Simulation-based clinical systems testing for healthcare spaces: from intake through implementation. Advances in simulation (London, England). 2019;4:19. doi:10.1186/s41077-019-0108-7 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Congenie K, Bartjen L, Gutierrez D, et al. Learning from Latent Safety Threats Identified During Simulation to Improve Patient Safety. Joint Commission journal on quality and patient safety. Dec 2023;49(12):716–723. doi:10.1016/j.jcjq.2023.08.003 - DOI - PubMed
    1. DeRosier J SE, Bagian JP, Nudell T. Using health care Failure Mode and Effect Analysis: the VA National Center for Patient Safety’s prospective risk analysis system. Jt Comm J Qual Improv. 2002;28(5):248–267, 209. - PubMed
    1. Nielsen DS DP, Mohr M, Mitchell AU, Ostergaard D. Augmenting health care failure modes and effects analysis with simulation. Simul Healthc. 2014;9(1):48–55. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms