Decision-making in women who considered planned oocyte cryopreservation: decision satisfaction or regret?
- PMID: 39799100
- DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2024.103944
Decision-making in women who considered planned oocyte cryopreservation: decision satisfaction or regret?
Abstract
Research question: Among women who considered planned oocyte cryopreservation, does decision regret differ between those who pursued planned oocyte cryopreservation and those who did not?
Design: A survey was e-mailed to all women who presented for an initial consultation for planned oocyte cryopreservation between January 2016 and December 2021 using a secure REDCap platform. The survey comprised questions on demographics, reproductive planning and the validated Decision Regret Scale (DRS). Univariable and multivariable models were fitted to compare decision regret in the group who had proceeded with planned oocyte cryopreservation with the group who had not. A sentiment analysis was employed to characterize the emotional tone of respondents.
Results: In total, 338 respondents met the eligibility criteria. Of these, 178 (52.7%) patients had proceeded with planned oocyte cryopreservation and 160 (47.3%) had not. The groups were similar in age, race, ethnicity and education. Respondents who had proceeded with planned oocyte cryopreservation were more likely to be single, to anticipate starting a family at ≥39 years of age, and to consider the use of donor spermatozoa to be an acceptable option. Respondents who had not proceeded with planned oocyte cryopreservation more frequently reported starting attempts at conception since their consultation. A higher proportion of respondents who had not undergone planned oocyte cryopreservation experienced moderate-to-severe regret with their decision compared with respondents who had undergone at least one cycle of planned oocyte cryopreservation (50% versus 13%; P < 0.001). There was a correlation between decreasing number of cryopreserved oocytes and increasing DRS score (R = -0.41, P < 0.001).
Conclusions: Women who consider planned oocyte cryopreservation but do not proceed with it experience substantial decision regret. The DRS score was highest among respondents who had not proceeded with planned oocyte cryopreservation, and respondents who had undergone at least one cycle of planned oocyte cryopreservation that resulted in a low number of cryopreserved oocytes.
Keywords: Decision-making; Egg freezing; Fertility; Oocyte cryopreservation.
Copyright © 2024 Reproductive Healthcare Ltd. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
To freeze or not to freeze: decision regret and satisfaction following elective oocyte cryopreservation.Fertil Steril. 2018 Jun;109(6):1097-1104.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2018.02.127. Epub 2018 May 25. Fertil Steril. 2018. PMID: 29807657
-
Decision regret among women considering planned oocyte cryopreservation: a prospective cohort study.J Assist Reprod Genet. 2023 Jun;40(6):1281-1290. doi: 10.1007/s10815-023-02789-w. Epub 2023 Apr 14. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2023. PMID: 37058259 Free PMC article.
-
Assessing the quality of decision-making for planned oocyte cryopreservation.J Assist Reprod Genet. 2021 Apr;38(4):907-916. doi: 10.1007/s10815-021-02103-6. Epub 2021 Feb 11. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2021. PMID: 33575856 Free PMC article.
-
Oocyte cryopreservation review: outcomes of medical oocyte cryopreservation and planned oocyte cryopreservation.Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2022 Jan 7;20(1):10. doi: 10.1186/s12958-021-00884-0. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2022. PMID: 34996479 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Is planned oocyte cryopreservation delivering?Reprod Biomed Online. 2025 Apr;50(4):104794. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2025.104794. Reprod Biomed Online. 2025. PMID: 40287213 Review.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous