Public awareness, attitudes, and motivation toward biobanks: a survey of China
- PMID: 39799302
- PMCID: PMC11724581
- DOI: 10.1186/s12910-025-01163-y
Public awareness, attitudes, and motivation toward biobanks: a survey of China
Abstract
Background: Biobanks are vital for advancing medical research, and public participation is a crucial determinant of their success. This study uses a survey to assess the awareness, attitudes, and motivation of the public in China with regard to participating in biobanks.
Methods: We conducted an online survey that yielded 616 responses from participants with diverse demographic backgrounds. The survey included questions on the respondents' awareness of biobanks, their attitudes toward them, their preferences with regard to consent, and their concerns.
Results: The results of the survey revealed that 57.95% of the respondents were aware of biobanks. Altruism was the respondents' primary motivation for participation in biobanks. Their preferences for models of consent varied. The respondents raised concerns about the commercialization of biobanks (56.66%) and data privacy (55.84%). Notably, only 37.01% of the respondents were concerned about the risk of discrimination in biobanks, where this was lower compared with the results for populations in Western countries.
Conclusions: This study provides valuable insights into the Chinese public's awareness of and attitudes toward biobanks. To foster public trust and enhance participation, biobanks should prioritize transparent and continual communication to ensure that the participants are well informed about the use and protection of the samples that they have donated. Future research should explore the influence of cultural nuances to develop strategies that address specific concerns and ethical challenges in the context of public participation in biobanks.
Keywords: Altruism; Attitudes; Biobanks; Consent; Public awareness.
© 2025. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
Declarations. Ethics approval and consent to participate: The study protocol was reviewed and approved by the Ethics Review Committee of the Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, ID: CAMS&PUMC-IEC-2024-045. The ethical approval document, including the official seal, is provided as a supplementary PDF file in the manuscript submission system. The research was conducted in accordance with relevant ethical guidelines and regulations for studies involving human participants and/or human tissue samples. The questionnaire was fully anonymized, and did not reveal any of the participants’ personal information or any other detail that could be used to identify them. A form to obtain their informed consent was included in the introductory section of the questionnaire, where the participants were required to confirm that they understood the research-related information, and expressed their willingness to participate in the study by clicking an “Agree” button or checking a consent box. Consent for publication: Not Applicable. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.
Similar articles
-
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843. JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016. PMID: 27532314
-
Sexual Harassment and Prevention Training.2024 Mar 29. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2025 Jan–. 2024 Mar 29. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2025 Jan–. PMID: 36508513 Free Books & Documents.
-
Can We Enhance Shared Decision-making for Periacetabular Osteotomy Surgery? A Qualitative Study of Patient Experiences.Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Jan 1;483(1):120-136. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003198. Epub 2024 Jul 23. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025. PMID: 39051876
-
Stakeholder Perspectives on Research Consent and Reconsent for Procedures Involving Biological Samples and Biobanking of Children and Adolescents Living With HIV in Kenya.J Int Assoc Provid AIDS Care. 2024 Jan-Dec;23:23259582241305424. doi: 10.1177/23259582241305424. J Int Assoc Provid AIDS Care. 2024. PMID: 39668694 Free PMC article.
-
"Let's get the best quality research we can": public awareness and acceptance of consent to use existing data in health research: a systematic review and qualitative study.BMC Med Res Methodol. 2013 Jun 4;13:72. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-13-72. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2013. PMID: 23734773 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Rusk N. The UK Biobank [J]. Nat Methods. 2018;15(12):1001. - PubMed
-
- Compton C. Why the United States needs a National, coordinated Biobanking System [J]. Ann Intern Med. 2021;174(12):1761–2. - PubMed
-
- Yang Yajun S, Yuhui W. Ethical challenges and responses faced by Human Biological Sample banks [J]. Chin Science: Life Sci. 2024;54(06):976–86.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical