Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Jan:71:101509.
doi: 10.1016/j.dcn.2025.101509. Epub 2025 Jan 9.

Fear extinction retention in children, adolescents, and adults

Affiliations

Fear extinction retention in children, adolescents, and adults

Ebba Widegren et al. Dev Cogn Neurosci. 2025 Jan.

Abstract

Past results suggest that fear extinction and the return of extinguished fear are compromised in adolescents. However, findings have been inconclusive as there is a lack of fear extinction and extinction retention studies including children, adolescents and adults. In the present study, 36 children (6-9 years), 40 adolescents (13-17 years) and 44 adults (30-40 years), underwent a two-day fear conditioning task. Habituation, acquisition, and extinction were performed on the first day and an extinction retention test > 24 h later. Skin conductance responses were recorded during all phases of fear conditioning and functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) was conducted during the fear retention test. All groups acquired and extinguished fear as measured with SCR, with no group differences in SCR during extinction retention. The groups had largely similar neural fear responses during the retention test, apart from adolescents displaying stronger amygdala fear response than children, with no differences between adolescents and adults. The findings do not support an adolescent extinction dip, and there was only marginal evidence of progressive changes in fear conditioning across development. In contrast to findings in rodents, fear conditioning in humans may elicit similar physiological responses and recruit similar neural networks from childhood to adulthood.

Keywords: Development; FMRI; Fear conditioning; Fear extinction; Fear retention; Threat conditioning.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Illustration of the fear conditioning task. In session 1, participants underwent habituation, fear acquisition and extinction learning in the lab, and in session 2, > 24 h later, the extinction retention test was performed inside the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scanner. The conditioned stimulus (CS) that was paired with the unconditioned stimulus (US) scream (CS+) was counterbalanced across participants.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Flow chart of inclusion/exclusion of participants.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Square-root (sqrt) of skin conductance responses (SCR) to the conditioned stimulus paired with a scream (CS+) and never-paired (CS-) during the four phases of conditioning in children, adolescents, and adults. Error bars denote standard error.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Fear ratings to conditioned stimuli. Ratings (1−5) of fear to the CS+ (red) and CS- (blue) before habituation, after fear acquisition, and after extinction learning in all age groups.
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Fear retention in the brain. Across age groups, fear retention (CS+>CS-) was detected mainly in the insula and the mid-cingulate region, but also included clusters in the anterior PFC, and the paracingulate gyrus. Statistical parametric maps thresholded at family-wise error corrected (FWE) pFWE< .05 and overlaid on T1-weighted anatomical reference images. Color bar indicates Z scores. A: anterior, L: left.

Similar articles

Cited by

  • Puberty, sex, and fear extinction retention: A neuroimaging study in youth.
    Bhargava S, Zundel CG, Shampine M, Ely S, Carpenter C, Losiowski J, Chanamolu S, Jande J, Tamimi R, Sharma K, O'Mara E, Jaster AM, Marusak HA. Bhargava S, et al. Dev Cogn Neurosci. 2025 Jul 7;75:101595. doi: 10.1016/j.dcn.2025.101595. Online ahead of print. Dev Cogn Neurosci. 2025. PMID: 40638987 Free PMC article.

References

    1. Abend R., Gold A.L., Britton J.C., Michalska K.J., Shechner T., Sachs J.F., Winkler A.M., Leibenluft E., Averbeck B.B., Pine D.S. Anticipatory threat responding: associations with anxiety, development, and brain structure. Biol. Psychiatry. 2020;87(10):916–925. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2019.11.006. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bach D.R., Sporrer J., Abend R., Beckers T., Dunsmoor J.E., Fullana M.A., Gamer M., Gee D.G., Hamm A., Hartley C.A., Herringa R.J., Jovanovic T., Kalisch R., Knight D.C., Lissek S., Lonsdorf T.B., Merz C.J., Milad M., Morriss J.…Schiller D. Consensus design of a calibration experiment for human fear conditioning. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 2023;148 doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2023.105146. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Björkstrand J., Pine D.S., Frick A. Evaluating an internet-delivered fear conditioning and extinction protocol using response times and affective ratings. Sci. Rep. 2022;12(1):4014. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-07999-3. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bouton M.E. Context and behavioral processes in extinction. Learn. Mem. 2004;11(5):485–494. doi: 10.1101/lm.78804. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Britton J.C., Lissek S., Grillon C., Norcross M.A., Pine D.S. Development of anxiety: the role of threat appraisal and fear learning. Depress Anxiety. 2011;28(1):5–17. doi: 10.1002/da.20733. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources