Perioperative analgesic effects of a modified supratemporal retrobulbar block in dogs undergoing corneal and endocular surgery
- PMID: 39799983
- PMCID: PMC12079311
- DOI: 10.1111/jsap.13829
Perioperative analgesic effects of a modified supratemporal retrobulbar block in dogs undergoing corneal and endocular surgery
Abstract
Objectives: To evaluate the perioperative efficacy of a modified supratemporal retrobulbar block in dogs undergoing ocular surgery.
Materials and methods: In this prospective randomised clinical trial, dogs were premedicated with dexmedetomidine (1 mcg/kg im) and methadone (0.1 mg/kg im), induced with propofol to effect and maintained with isoflurane (FE'Iso 1.1%). In the retrobulbar group a mixture of lidocaine 2% (5.5 mL) and ropivacaine 0.75% (2 mL) was administered at 0.1 mL/kg, via a modified supratemporal technique using a Tuohy needle. No block was performed in the controls. When heart rate or mean arterial pressure increased above 30% of the pre-incisional values, fentanyl (1 mcg/kg iv) was administered. Propofol (1 mg/kg iv) was injected when anaesthesia was deemed too light. After a total of three administrations regardless of the type of drugs (fentanyl/propofol), a constant rate infusion of fentanyl (5 mcg/kg/h iv) was started. Quality of recovery (blindly assessed using a descriptive score scale), postoperative eye rubbing and complications were studied.
Results: Eighteen dogs were included. The retrobulbar group (nine) dogs had significantly less risk of receiving fentanyl than controls (nine) (Relative risk: 0.142, 95% CI: 0.021 to 0.936) and a recovery score > 2 (RR: 0.058, 95% CI: 0.003 to 0.887). The median amount of fentanyl (mcg/kg) was statistically lower in the retrobulbar group than in the controls: 0 mcg/kg (range, 0 to 1) versus 2 mcg/kg (range, 0 to 8.49), respectively. Only controls showed eye rubbing.
Clinical significance: The modified supratemporal retrobulbar block reduced the intraoperative rescue analgesia and improved the quality of recovery.
© 2025 The Author(s). Journal of Small Animal Practice published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of British Small Animal Veterinary Association.
Conflict of interest statement
None of the authors of this article has a financial or personal relationship with other people or organisations that could inappropriately influence or bias the content of the paper.
References
-
- Accola, P.J. , Bentley, E. , Smith, L.J. , Forrest, L.J. , Baumel, C.A. & Murphy, C.J. (2006) Development of a retrobulbar injection technique for ocular surgery and analgesia in dogs. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association, 229, 220–225. - PubMed
-
- Alwitry, A. , Koshy, Z. , Browning, A.C. , Kiel, W. & Holden, R. (2001) The effect of sub‐Tenon's anaesthesia on intraocular pressure. Eye, 15, 733–735. - PubMed
-
- Briley, J.D. , Washington, D. , Westermeyer, H.D. , Posner, L.P. & Chiavaccini, L. (2024) Comparison of a blind and an ultrasound‐guided technique for retrobulbar anesthesia in dogs undergoing unilateral subconjunctival enucleation. Veterinary Ophthalmology, 27, 79–85. - PubMed
-
- Carcamo‐Cavazos, V. & Cannesson, M. (2022) Opioid‐free anesthesia: the pros and cons. Advances in Anesthesia, 40, 149–166. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
