Mini Fragment and Small Fragment Screws are Comparable in Acute Syndesmotic Injury
- PMID: 39800110
- DOI: 10.1053/j.jfas.2025.01.003
Mini Fragment and Small Fragment Screws are Comparable in Acute Syndesmotic Injury
Abstract
Ankle fractures are often accompanied by syndesmotic injuries, contributing to instability and potential long term complications. Syndesmotic injuries are traditionally fixed with either small fragment (3.5-mm diameter) or large fragment (4.5-mm diameter) syndesmotic screws. With regards to the recent emergence of less prominent implants for ankle fracture, this study was set out to compare the outcomes of mini fragment screws (2.7-mm or 2.8-mm diameter) and small fragment screws in syndesmotic fixation. Eighty-seven patients with traumatic syndesmotic injuries were retrospectively included for this study. Forty-four patients underwent mini fragment fixation and 43 patients underwent standard small fragment fixation. After-treatment was similar in both groups. Primary outcome consisted of the incidence of malreduction and secondary dislocation within three months. Secondary objectives were the incidence of the overall complication rate and implant removal rate. In total, malreduction was observed in three patients (3.4 %) and secondary dislocation in two patients (2.3 %), with no significant differences between the mini fragment and small fragment groups. Mini fragment fixation demonstrated a significantly lower overall complication rate (2.3 %) compared to the small fragment group (16.3 %)(p = .030). Implant removal rates were similar between the groups (27.3 % for mini fragment and 27.9 % for small fragment screws). This study suggests that both screw types are effective for fixation of acute syndesmotic injuries, with comparable malreduction and secondary dislocation rates. Prospective studies with longer follow-up, including functional outcome, are needed for comprehensive insights into optimal syndesmotic screw selection.
Keywords: Ankle; fixation; fracture; malreduction; syndesmosis; tibiofibular joint.
Copyright © 2025. Published by Elsevier Inc.
Conflict of interest statement
Declaration of Conflicting Interests The author(s) declare(s) that there is no conflicts of interest.
Similar articles
-
A systematic review of suture-button versus syndesmotic screw in the treatment of distal tibiofibular syndesmosis injury.BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2017 Jul 4;18(1):286. doi: 10.1186/s12891-017-1645-7. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2017. PMID: 28676078 Free PMC article.
-
Correction of syndesmotic malreduction following fixation flexibilization.Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 1;15(1):22434. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-04117-x. Sci Rep. 2025. PMID: 40593952 Free PMC article.
-
Removal of Hardware After Syndesmotic Screw Fixation: A Systematic Literature Review.Foot Ankle Spec. 2017 Jun;10(3):252-257. doi: 10.1177/1938640016685153. Epub 2016 Dec 27. Foot Ankle Spec. 2017. PMID: 28027655
-
Does syndesmotic fixation technique impact complication rates and functional outcomes measured by PROMIS scores following operative repair of ankle fractures?J Orthop Surg Res. 2025 Aug 6;20(1):730. doi: 10.1186/s13018-025-06137-9. J Orthop Surg Res. 2025. PMID: 40770808 Free PMC article.
-
Should syndesmotic screws be removed after surgical fixation of unstable ankle fractures? a systematic review.Bone Joint J. 2016 Nov;98-B(11):1497-1504. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.98B11.BJJ-2016-0202.R1. Bone Joint J. 2016. PMID: 27803225
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical