A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 study of Socazolimab or placebo combined with carboplatin and etoposide in the first-line treatment of extensive-stage small cell lung cancer
- PMID: 39800716
- PMCID: PMC11725569
- DOI: 10.1038/s41392-024-02115-5
A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 study of Socazolimab or placebo combined with carboplatin and etoposide in the first-line treatment of extensive-stage small cell lung cancer
Abstract
This is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 clinical trial (ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04878016) conducted in 54 hospitals in China. Adults who were histologically diagnosed and never treated for extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC) were enrolled. Eligible Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive four cycles (21 days as one cycle) of intravenous carboplatin (area under the curve of 5 mg/mL per min, day 1 of each cycle) and etoposide (100 mg/m² of body-surface area, on days 1-3 of each cycle) with either socazolimab (5 mg/kg, day 1 of each cycle) or matching placebo, following maintenance therapy with socazolimab or placebo. From July 15, 2021, to May 12, 2022, 498 eligible patients were randomly assigned to receive socazolimab (250 patients) or placebo (248 patients) combined with chemotherapy. As of October 13, 2023, patients treated with socazolimab presented significant overall survival (OS) benefit (13.90 months) compared with the placebo plus EC group (11.58 months) (hazard ratio for death, 0.799; 95% CI, 0.652-0.979; p = 0.0158). The median progression free survival (PFS) was 5.55 months in the socazolimab plus EC group, prolonging disease progression or death by nearly 1.2 months (5.55 months vs 4.37 months, hazard ratio for progression or death, 0.569; 95% CI, 0.457-0.708; p < 0.0001). 200 (80.3%) patients in the socazolimab plus EC group experienced ≥ grade 3 treatment-related adverse events and 187 (75.7%) patients occurred in the placebo plus EC group. Socazolimab combined with standard EC regimen chemotherapy for first-line treatment of ES-SCLC significantly prolonged overall survival and did not increase the safety risk of treatment.
© 2025. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interests: B.X.L., X.D., M.W., Yuj.L., and X.Y. are employees of Zhaoke (Guangzhou) Oncology Pharmaceuticals. All other authors declare no competing interests.
Figures
References
-
- Howlader, N. et al. SEER cancer statistics review (CSR), 1975–2014. National Cancer Institute, accessed 15 April 2024; https://seer.cancer.gov/csr/1975_2018
-
- Govindan, R. et al. Changing epidemiology of small-cell lung cancer in the United States over the last 30 years: analysis of the surveillance, epidemiologic, and end results database. J. Clin. Oncol.24, 4539–4544 (2006). - PubMed
-
- Jett, J. R., Schild, S. E., Kesler, K. A. & Kalemkerian, G. P. Treatment of small cell lung cancer: diagnosis and management of lung cancer, 3rd ed: American College of Chest Physicians evidence-based clinical practice guidelines. Chest143, e400S–e4419 (2013). - PubMed
-
- Network NCC. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: small cell lung cancer, version.3, accessed 15 April 2024. https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/pdf/nscl.pdf (2022).
-
- Rossi, A. et al. Carboplatin or cisplatin-based chemotherapy in first-line treatment of small-cell lung cancer: the COCIS meta-analysis of individual patient data. J. Clin. Oncol.14, 1692–1698 (2012). - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
