Seed banking impacts native Acacia ulicifolia seed microbiome composition and function
- PMID: 39800756
- PMCID: PMC11727264
- DOI: 10.1186/s40793-024-00657-3
Seed banking impacts native Acacia ulicifolia seed microbiome composition and function
Abstract
Background: Seed banks are a vital resource for preserving plant species diversity globally. However, seedling establishment and survival rates from banked seeds can be poor. Despite a growing appreciation for the role of seed-associated microbiota in supporting seed quality and plant health, our understanding of the effects of conventional seed banking processes on seed microbiomes remains limited. In this study we investigated the composition and functional potential of seed-associated bacterial epiphytes associated with stored and freshly collected seeds of a native plant, Acacia ulicifolia, using both 16S rRNA gene sequencing and culture-based approaches.
Results: Seeds obtained from seed banking facilities were found to host significantly less diverse bacterial populations, with substantial reductions in both low-abundance taxa and in community members commonly identified in freshly collected A. ulicifolia seeds. Bacteria with key plant growth promoting traits including IAA production, ACC deaminase activity, phosphate solubilisation, siderophore activity, and nitrogen fixation were identified in seed epiphytic communities, but these beneficial traits were less prevalent in stored seed compared to fresh seeds.
Conclusion: Overall, these results suggest that epiphytic seed microbiomes may undergo significant changes during the storage process, selecting for bacteria tolerant to storage conditions, and potentially reducing the population of plant-growth promoting bacteria on seeds.
Keywords: Bacterial traits; Conservation; Native seed microbiota; Plant growth-promoting traits; Seed epiphytes; Seed storage.
© 2024. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
Declarations. Ethics approval and consent to participate: Not applicable. Consent for publication: Not applicable. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.
Figures






References
-
- Frischie S, Miller AL, Pedrini S, Kildisheva OA. Ensuring seed quality in ecological restoration: native seed cleaning and testing. Restor Ecol. 2020;28(S3):S239–48.
-
- De Vitis M, Hay FR, Dickie JB, Trivedi C, Choi J, Fiegener R. Seed storage: maintaining seed viability and vigor for restoration use. Restor Ecol. 2020;28(S3):S249–55.
-
- Merritt DJ, Dixon KW. Conservation: restoration seed banks–a matter of scale. Science. 2011;332(6028):424–5. - PubMed
-
- Ceccon E, González EJ, Martorell C. Is direct seeding a biologically viable strategy for restoring forest ecosystems? Evidences from a meta-analysis. Land Degrad Dev. 2016;27(3):511–20.
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources