Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2025 Jan;53(1):154-164.
doi: 10.62641/aep.v53i1.1628.

Psychological Intervention for Depression and Anxiety in Hemodialysis Patients: A Meta-Analysis

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Psychological Intervention for Depression and Anxiety in Hemodialysis Patients: A Meta-Analysis

Siming Yan et al. Actas Esp Psiquiatr. 2025 Jan.

Abstract

Background: With the advancement of blood purification technology, there is increasing attention to the mental health of hemodialysis patients, particularly concerning depression. This study aims to determine the effect of psychological interventions on anxiety and depression in hemodialysis patients through a meta-analysis.

Methods: A computerized search was conducted to identify randomized controlled trial (RCT) studies published in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, ScienceDirect, and Cochrane Library databases from their inception to October 2023, focusing on the effects of psychological interventions on improving depression in hemodialysis patients. Data extraction, quality evaluation, and cross-checking were performed independently by two researchers. The methodological quality of the included studies was assessed according to the criteria recommended by the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews and the meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.4 software (The Nordic Cochrane Centre, Copenhagen, Denmark). The effect of psychological interventions on anxiety and depression in hemodialysis patients was determined by combining effect sizes and I2 statistics.

Results: Fifteen studies were included, encompassing a total of 929 hemodialysis patients: 468 in the intervention group and 461 in the control group. The results indicated that psychological interventions could improve depressive moods [mean difference (MD) = -4.91, 95% confidence intervals (CI) (-6.56, -3.26), p < 0.001] and anxiety status [MD = -5.11, 95% CI (-6.97, -3.25), p < 0.001]. A subgroup analysis based on the intervention duration (more or less than 8 weeks) revealed that patients experienced significant improvements in depression and anxiety regardless of the intervention length. Additionally, subgroup analyses focusing on quality of life demonstrated that psychological interventions significantly improved the psychological aspects of patients' quality of life [MD = 7.31, 95% CI (1.06, 13.56), p = 0.001]. Sensitivity analysis, which excluded sources of heterogeneity, indicated that psychological interventions significantly enhanced both the psychological [odds ratios (OR) = 4.14, 95% CI (1.08, 7.20), p = 0.008] and physical [MD = 2.52, 95% CI (0.10, 4.95), p = 0.04] aspects of patients' quality of life.

Conclusion: Psychological interventions can significantly alleviate depression and anxiety in hemodialysis patients and improve their quality of life. Psychotherapy holds promise as an effective method for improving depression in dialysis patients.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
Literature retrieval process.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.
Risk of bias graph.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 3.
Risk of bias summary.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 4.
Forest plot of depression. CI, confidence intervals.
Fig. 5.
Fig. 5.
Forest plot of subgroup analysis of intervention duration for depression.
Fig. 6.
Fig. 6.
Forest plot of anxiety.
Fig. 7.
Fig. 7.
Forest plot of subgroup analysis of intervention duration for anxiety.
Fig. 8.
Fig. 8.
Forest plot of subgroup analysis of life quality.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Jomova K, Raptova R, Alomar SY, Alwasel SH, Nepovimova E, Kuca K, et al. Reactive oxygen species, toxicity, oxidative stress, and antioxidants: chronic diseases and aging. Archives of Toxicology . 2023;97:2499–2574. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lameire NH, Levin A, Kellum JA, Cheung M, Jadoul M, Winkelmayer WC, et al. Harmonizing acute and chronic kidney disease definition and classification: report of a Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) Consensus Conference. Kidney International . 2021;100:516–526. - PubMed
    1. Zhang L, Wang F, Wang L, Wang W, Liu B, Liu J, et al. Prevalence of chronic kidney disease in China: a cross-sectional survey. Lancet (London, England) . 2012;379:815–822. - PubMed
    1. Ke C, Liang J, Liu M, Liu S, Wang C. Burden of chronic kidney disease and its risk-attributable burden in 137 low-and middle-income countries, 1990-2019: results from the global burden of disease study 2019. BMC Nephrology . 2022;23:17. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wang L, Xu X, Zhang M, Hu C, Zhang X, Li C, et al. Prevalence of Chronic Kidney Disease in China: Results from the Sixth China Chronic Disease and Risk Factor Surveillance. JAMA Internal Medicine . 2023;183:298–310. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types