Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2025 Jan 13.
doi: 10.1111/jre.13377. Online ahead of print.

Diagnostic Accuracy of Microbiome-Derived Biomarkers in Periodontitis: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Anbo Dong  1 , Gordon Proctor  1 , Svetislav Zaric  1
Affiliations
Review

Diagnostic Accuracy of Microbiome-Derived Biomarkers in Periodontitis: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Anbo Dong et al. J Periodontal Res. .

Abstract

Aim: To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of microbiome-derived biomarkers for periodontitis in oral fluids (saliva and subgingival samples).

Methods: This systematic review followed PRISMA guidelines. Electronic searches were performed across multiple databases from December 2022 to November 2024. Subgroup analyses, divided into saliva and subgingival samples, were performed using the Random Effects Model (REM), while individual biomarker sensitivity and specificity were evaluated through the Bivariate Random-Effects Model (BREM).

Results: Ten studies were included, stratified by sample type. In the saliva group, Porphyromonas gingivalis, Tannerella forsythia and Prevotella intermedia demonstrated the highest diagnostic accuracy, with sensitivities reaching 89.2%, 89.2% and 86.5%, and specificities of 94.6%, 86.5% and 83.8%, respectively, achieving AUC values above 0.80. Porphyromonas gingivalis was further analysed using BREM, with the Summary Receiver Operating Characteristic (SROC) curve indicating a combined sensitivity and specificity of 84.2% and 85.4%, with an AUC of 0.864. In the subgingival group, biomarkers such as endotoxin activity and combined bacterial biomarkers (5 bacterial species) displayed the highest diagnostic performance, with sensitivities of 90.6% and 85.1% and specificities of 87.9% and 100%, respectively, and AUC values of 0.93 and 0.88.

Conclusion: Microbiome-derived biomarkers show good clinical utility for improving diagnoses of periodontitis, offering high specificity and sensitivity. Future research should focus on standardising methodologies, increasing sample sizes, and including diverse populations to validate these findings, thereby improving diagnostic precision and facilitating the screening methods for the onset of periodontitis and dysbiotic activity.

Keywords: diagnostic accuracy; meta‐analysis; microbiome‐derived biomarkers; periodontitis; sensitivity; specificity; systematic review.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. G. G. Nascimento, S. Alves‐Costa, and M. Romandini, “Burden of Severe Periodontitis and Edentulism in 2021, With Projections up to 2050: The Global Burden of Disease 2021 Study,” Journal of Periodontal Research 59, no. 5 (2024): 823–867, https://doi.org/10.1111/jre.13337.
    1. M. X. Chen, Y. J. Zhong, Q. Q. Dong, H. M. Wong, and Y. F. Wen, “Global, Regional, and National Burden of Severe Periodontitis, 1990–2019: An Analysis of the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019,” Journal of Clinical Periodontology 48, no. 9 (2021): 1165–1188, https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpe.13506.
    1. M. S. Tonetti, H. Greenwell, and K. S. Kornman, “Staging and Grading of Periodontitis: Framework and Proposal of a New Classification and Case Definition,” Journal of Periodontology 89, no. Suppl 1 (2018): S159–s172, https://doi.org/10.1002/jper.18‐0006.
    1. J. Liukkonen, U. K. Gürsoy, E. Könönen, et al., “Salivary Biomarkers in Association With Periodontal Parameters and the Periodontitis Risk Haplotype,” Innate Immunity 24, no. 7 (2018): 439–447, https://doi.org/10.1177/1753425918796207.
    1. G. Hajishengallis, “The Inflammophilic Character of the Periodontitis‐Associated Microbiota,” Molecular Oral Microbiology 29, no. 6 (2014): 248–257, https://doi.org/10.1111/omi.12065.

LinkOut - more resources