River co-learning arenas: principles and practices for transdisciplinary knowledge co-creation and multi-scalar (inter)action
- PMID: 39802485
- PMCID: PMC11716650
- DOI: 10.1080/13549839.2024.2428215
River co-learning arenas: principles and practices for transdisciplinary knowledge co-creation and multi-scalar (inter)action
Abstract
This paper develops the methodological concept of river co-learning arenas (RCAs) and explores their potential to strengthen innovative grassroots river initiatives, enliven river commons, regenerate river ecologies, and foster greater socio-ecological justice. The integrity of river systems has been threatened in profound ways over the last century. Pollution, damming, canalisation, and water grabbing are some examples of pressures threatening the entwined lifeworlds of human and non-human communities that depend on riverine systems. Finding ways to reverse the trends of environmental degradation demands complex spatial-temporal, political, and institutional articulations across different levels of governance (from local to global) and among a plurality of actors who operate from diverse spheres of knowledge and systems of practice, and who have distinct capacities to affect decision-making. In this context, grassroots river initiatives worldwide use new multi-actor and multi-level dialogue arenas to develop proposals for river regeneration and promote social-ecological justice in opposition to dominant technocratic-hydraulic development strategies. This paper conceptualises these spaces of dialogue and action as RCAs and critically reflects on ways of organising and supporting RCAs while facilitating their cross-fertilisation in transdisciplinary practice. By integrating studies, debates, and theories from diverse disciplines, we generate multi-faceted insights and present cornerstones for the engagement with and/or enaction of RCAs. This encompasses five main themes central to RCAs: (1) River knowledge encounters and truth regimes, (2) transgressive co-learning, (3) confrontation and collaboration dynamics, (4) ongoing reflexivity, (5) transcultural knowledge assemblages and translocal bridging of rooted knowledge.
Keywords: River regeneration; activist research; river co-learning arenas; socio-ecological justice; transgressive learning.
© 2024 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
Conflict of interest statement
No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).
References
-
- Anderson, Elizabeth P., Jackson Sue, Tharme Rebecca E., Douglas Michael, Flotemersch Joseph E., Zwarteveen Margreet, and Lokgariwar Chicu. 2019. “Understanding Rivers and Their Social Relations: A Critical Step to Advance Environmental Water Management.” WIREs Water 6 (6): e1381. 10.1002/wat2.1381. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Arias López, Beatriz E., Andrä Christine, and de Guevara Berit Bliesemann. 2023. “Reflexivity in Research Teams through Narrative Practice and Textile-Making.” Qualitative Research 23 (2): 306–312. 10.1177/14687941211028799. - DOI
-
- Arthington, Angela H., Bhaduri Anik, Bunn Stuart E., Jackson Sue E., Tharme Rebecca E., Tickner Dave, and Young Bill. 2018. “The Brisbane Declaration and Global Action Agenda on Environmental Flows.” Frontiers in Environmental Science 6, 10.3389/fenvs.2018.00045. - DOI
-
- Bakker, Karen. 2012. “Water: Political, Biopolitical, Material.” Social Studies of Science 42 (4): 616–623. 10.1177/0306312712441396. - DOI
-
- Bakker, Karen, and Hendriks Richard. 2019. “Contested Knowledges in Hydroelectric Project Assessment: The Case of Canada’s Site C Project.” Water 11 (3): 406. 10.3390/w11030406. - DOI
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources