Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Feb 7;24(2):499-514.
doi: 10.1021/acs.jproteome.4c00630. Epub 2025 Jan 13.

4D-DIA Proteomics Uncovers New Insights into Host Salivary Response Following SARS-CoV-2 Omicron Infection

Affiliations

4D-DIA Proteomics Uncovers New Insights into Host Salivary Response Following SARS-CoV-2 Omicron Infection

Iasmim Lopes de Lima et al. J Proteome Res. .

Abstract

Since late 2021, Omicron variants have dominated the epidemiological scenario as the most successful severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) sublineages, driving new and breakthrough infections globally over the past two years. In this study, we investigated for the first time the host salivary response of COVID-19 patients infected with Omicron variants (BA.1, BA.2, and BA.4/5) by using an untargeted four-dimensional data-independent acquisition (4D-DIA)-based proteomics approach. We identified 137 proteins whose abundance levels differed between the COVID-19 positive and negative groups. Salivary signatures were mainly enriched in ribosomal proteins, linked to mRNAviral translation, protein synthesis and processing, immune innate, and antiapoptotic signaling. The higher abundance of 14-3-3 proteins (YWHAG, YWHAQ, YWHAE, and SFN) in saliva, first reported here, may be associated with increased infectivity and improved viral replicative fitness. We also identified seven proteins (ACTN1, H2AC2, GSN, NDKA, CD109, GGH, and PCYOX) that yielded comprehension into Omicron infection and performed outstandingly in screening patients with COVID-19 in a hospital setting. This panel also presented an enhanced anti-COVID-19 and anti-inflammatory signature, providing insights into disease severity, supported by comparisons with other proteome data sets. The salivary signature provided valuable insights into the host's response to SARS-CoV-2 Omicron infection, shedding light on the pathophysiology of COVID-19, particularly in cases associated with mild disease. It also underscores the potential clinical applications of saliva for disease screening in hospital settings. Data are available via ProteomeXchange with the identifier PXD054133.

Keywords: COVID-19; DIA-PASEF; Omicron; SARS-CoV-2; mass spectrometry; proteomics; saliva.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing financial interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Schematic representation of the study design and proteomics workflow. LC-MS/MS: Liquid Chromatography-Tandem Mass Spectrometry; DIA-PASEF: data-independent acquisition-parallel accumulation-serial fragmentation; TIC: total ion chromatogram. ROC: receiver operating characteristic.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Differentially expressed proteins (DEPs) in the saliva of COVID-19 positive and negative groups. (A) Volcano plot of DEPs showing 122 upregulated proteins (red dots) and 15 downregulated proteins (green dots) in the COVID-19 positive group, as determined by the Student’s t test (FDR 1%) with a log 2FC ≥ 1.2. (B) The heatmap shows clusters of samples based on protein expression patterns, with green indicating low and red indicating high differential protein abundance. Z-scores of normalized protein abundances were used, and clustering was performed using Euclidean distance and average linkage. The rows represent the DEPs, while the columns correspond to the individual samples.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Six densely connected protein complexes obtained from upregulated proteins in the COVID-19 positive cohort using the Molecular Complex Detection (MCODE) algorithm. The top three highly enriched pathways or processes are described for each module. M1, M2, M3, M4, M5, and M6 are modules 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 respectively.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Predictor selection and classification model. A) Venn Diagram indicating the 16 overlapping proteins between Boruta feature selection and differential abundance analysis. B) ROC curve of the best model based on SVM multivariate ROC curve analysis. Model 4 achieved the highest AUC (0.959, CI. 0.873-1). C) Seven selected proteins from Model 4 ranked by average importance. D) Confusion matrix and performance of Model 4 highlighting sensitivity (91%), specificity (94%), balanced accuracy (92%), PPV (95%), and NPV (88%) metrics.

References

    1. Yang L.; Zhong J.; Wang W.; Zhou F.; Tong Z.; Zheng Y.; Chen X. Clinical Features of Omicron Variant Infection in 445 Patients with Coronavirus 19 Disease. Ann. Saudi Med. 2023, 43 (3), 161–165. 10.5144/0256-4947.2023.27.03.1300. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Goller K. V.; Ziemann J.; Kohler C.; Becker K.; Hübner N. O. Clinical Manifestations of Infections with the Omicron Sub-Lineages BA.1, BA.2, and BA.5: A Retrospective Follow-Up Analysis of Public Health Data from Mecklenburg-Western Pomerania, Germany. Viruses 2024, 16 (3), 454. 10.3390/v16030454. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wei J.; Stoesser N.; Matthews P. C.; Khera T.; Gethings O.; Diamond I.; Studley R.; Taylor N.; Peto T. E. A.; Walker A. S.; Pouwels K. B.; Eyre D. W.; Rourke E.; Thomas T.; Pienaar D.; Preece J.; Crofts S.; Lloyd L.; Bowen M.; Ayoubkhani D.; Black R.; Felton A.; Crees M.; Jones J.; Sutherland E.; Crook D. W.; Pritchard E.; Vihta K.-D.; Howarth A.; Marsden B. D.; Chau K. K.; Ferreira L. M.; Dejnirattisai W.; Mongkolsapaya J.; Hoosdally S.; Cornall R.; Stuart D. I.; Screaton G.; Lythgoe K.; Bonsall D.; Golubchik T.; Fryer H.; Newton J. N.; Bell J. I.; Cox S.; Paddon K.; James T.; House T.; Robotham J.; Birrell P.; Jordan H.; Sheppard T.; Athey G.; Moody D.; Curry L.; Brereton P.; Jarvis I.; Godsmark A.; Morris G.; Mallick B.; Eeles P.; Hay J.; VanSteenhouse H.; Lee J.; White S.; Evans T.; Bloemberg L.; Allison K.; Pandya A.; Davis S.; Conway D. I.; MacLeod M.; Cunningham C.; Risk of SARS-CoV-2 Reinfection during Multiple Omicron Variant Waves in the UK General Population. Nat. Commun. 2024, 15 (1), 1008. 10.1038/s41467-024-44973-1. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Andeweg S. P.; De Gier B.; Eggink D.; Van Den Ende C.; Van Maarseveen N.; Ali L.; Vlaemynck B.; Schepers R.; Hahné S. J. M.; Reusken C. B. E. M.; De Melker H. E.; Van Den Hof S.; Knol M. J. Protection of COVID-19 Vaccination and Previous Infection against Omicron BA.1, BA.2 and Delta SARS-CoV-2 Infections. Nat. Commun. 2022, 13 (1), 4738. 10.1038/s41467-022-31838-8. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Araf Y.; Akter F.; Tang Y.-d.; Fatemi R.; Parvez S. A.; Zheng C.; Hossain G. Omicron Variant of SARS-CoV-2: Genomics, Transmissibility, and Responses to Current COVID-19 Vaccines. J. Med. Virol. 2022, 94 (5), 1825–1832. 10.1002/jmv.27588. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Supplementary concepts