Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Apr;14(2):527-545.
doi: 10.1007/s40120-024-00708-4. Epub 2025 Jan 13.

Measurement Properties of the Friedreich Ataxia Rating Scale in Patients with Spinocerebellar Ataxia

Affiliations

Measurement Properties of the Friedreich Ataxia Rating Scale in Patients with Spinocerebellar Ataxia

Michele H Potashman et al. Neurol Ther. 2025 Apr.

Abstract

Introduction: The Friedreich Ataxia Rating Scale-Activities of Daily Living (FARS-ADL) is a valid, highly utilized measure for assessing ADL impacts in patients with Friedreich ataxia. We provide evidence of the psychometric validity of the FARS-ADL in two cohorts of patients with spinocerebellar ataxia (SCA).

Methods: Using data from a cohort of real-world subjects with SCA (recruited at Massachusetts General Hospital [MGH]; n = 33) and a phase 3 trial of troriluzole in adults with SCA (NCT03701399 [Study 206]; n = 217), comprising a subset of patients with the SCA3 genotype (n = 89), the psychometric measurement properties and minimal change thresholds of the FARS-ADL were examined.

Results: Ceiling effects for the FARS-ADL were absent within the MGH cohort while floor effects were observed for eight of nine items. Excellent internal consistency reliability was observed (αtotal = 0.88; αitems-removed = 0.86-0.87), and item-to-total correlations were acceptable (r = 0.55-0.89 per item). Convergent and divergent validity were supported with strong correlations demonstrated between FARS-ADL and scales measuring similar concepts (Neuro-QOL [Upper], Neuro-QOL [Lower], PROM-ADL, PROM-PHYS, and FARS-FUNC; all P < 0.001) and weaker correlations shown between measures of differing constructs. A two- to three-point threshold for meaningful changes was supported as 0.5 × SD = 2.43, SEM = 2.19. Mean changes from baseline for subjects classified as "improved," "no change," or "deteriorated" were -0.54, 0.22, and 1.47, respectively. Similar trends were observed in the Study 206 all-SCA and SCA3 cohorts.

Conclusion: Psychometric evaluation showed that the FARS-ADL performed well on analyses examining the reliability and validity of the measure and can detect meaningful changes in patients with SCA, including those with SCA3.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT03701399 (Study 206).

Keywords: Activities of daily living; Outcomes assessment; Psychometrics; Spinocerebellar ataxias; Validation study.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations. Conflict of Interest: Michele Potashman, Ainsley Mackenzie, Melissa Wolfe Beiner, Vlad Coric, and Gilbert L’Italien are employees of Biohaven Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Evan Popoff and Lauren Powell are employees of Broadstreet HEOR, which received funds from Biohaven Pharmaceuticals, Inc, for this work. Sub Subramony has received research support from the National Ataxia Foundation, Biohaven Pharmaceuticals, Inc, National Institutes of Health, US Food and Drug Administration, Muscular Dystrophy Association, Wyck Foundation, Friedreich’s Ataxia Research Alliance, Reata, PTC Therapeutics, Retrotope, Avidity Biosciences, Fulcrum Therapeutics, Reneo Pharma, and AavantiBio; and has served on scientific advisory boards for Reata, Avidity, and Dyne Therapeutics. Matthis Synofzik has received consultancy honoraria from Ionis, UCB, Prevail, Orphazyme, Servier, Reata, GenOrph, AviadoBio, Biohaven, Solaxa, Zevra, and Lilly. Jeremy Schmahmann consults for Biohaven Pharmaceuticals and is site PI for Biohaven Pharmaceuticals clinical trials NCT03701399, NCT02960893, and NCT03952806; receives royalties from Oxford University Press, Elsevier, MacKeith Press, and Springer; and is the inventor of the Brief Ataxia Rating Scale, Cerebellar Cognitive Affective/Schmahmann Syndrome Scale, the Patient-Reported Outcome Measure of Ataxia, and the Cerebellar Neuropsychiatry Rating Scale, which are licensed to the General Hospital Corporation. He is supported in part by the National Ataxia Foundation, the MINDLink Foundation, and the Raynor Cerebellum Project. Ethical Approval: Study 206 (BHV4157-206; NCT03701399) was a multisite study approved by a centralized independent Institutional Review Board (Institutional Review Board; Advarra, Columbia, MD, USA), with additional local Institutional Review Board approvals obtained where requested (per institute). The PROM-Ataxia study (MGH psychometric cohort) was approved by Mass General Brigham Human Research Committee Institutional Review Board (Somerville, MA, USA). Both studies were conducted in accordance with the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
The FARS-ADL eCDF curve by CGI-I anchor category demonstrated that FARS-ADL could capture meaningful improvements and deterioration in ambulant subjects over 48 weeks in the –2 to +3 FARS-ADL change range in all patients with SCA (Study 206). CFB change from baseline, CGI-I clinical global impression-global improvement scale, eCDF empirical cumulative distribution function, FARS-ADL Friedreich Ataxia Rating Scale–Activities of Daily Living, SCA spinocerebellar ataxia
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
The FARS-ADL probability density function curve by CGI-I change from baseline status provided support for the empirical cumulative distribution function curve, showing that FARS-ADL could capture meaningful improvements and deterioration in ambulant subjects over 48 weeks in the –2 to +3 FARS-ADL change range in all patients with SCA (Study 206). CFB change from baseline, CGI-I clinical global impression-global improvement scale, FARS-ADL Friedreich Ataxia Rating Scale–Activities of Daily Living, PDF probability density function, SCA spinocerebellar ataxia

References

    1. Yap KH, Azmin S, Che Hamzah J, Ahmad N, van de Warrenburg B, Mohamed IN. Pharmacological and non-pharmacological management of spinocerebellar ataxia: a systematic review. J Neurol. 2022;269(5):2315–37. 10.1007/s00415-021-10874-2. - PubMed
    1. Bodranghien F, Bastian A, Casali C, et al. Consensus paper: revisiting the symptoms and signs of cerebellar syndrome. Cerebellum. 2016;15(3):369–91. 10.1007/s12311-015-0687-3. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sullivan R, Yau WY, O’Connor E, Houlden H. Spinocerebellar ataxia: an update. J Neurol. 2019;266(2):533–44. 10.1007/s00415-018-9076-4. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lieto M, Riso V, Galatolo D, et al. The complex phenotype of spinocerebellar ataxia type 48 in eight unrelated Italian families. Eur J Neurol. 2020;27(3):498–505. 10.1111/ene.14094. - PubMed
    1. Brooker SM, Edamakanti CR, Akasha SM, Kuo SH, Opal P. Spinocerebellar ataxia clinical trials: opportunities and challenges. Ann Clin Transl Neurol. 2021;8(7):1543–56. 10.1002/acn3.51370. - PMC - PubMed

Associated data

LinkOut - more resources