Procedural sedative effect of remimazolam in ICU patients on invasive mechanical ventilation: a randomised, prospective study
- PMID: 39808218
- PMCID: PMC11732822
- DOI: 10.1186/s13613-025-01431-5
Procedural sedative effect of remimazolam in ICU patients on invasive mechanical ventilation: a randomised, prospective study
Abstract
Background: Invasive procedures and environmental factors in the intensive care unit (ICU) may cause anxiety and discomfort in patients, who often require sedation therapy. The aim of this study was to assess the safety of remimazolam tosilate for procedural sedation in ICU patients receiving mechanical ventilation following endotracheal intubation. Eighty patients from a single centre were randomly assigned to either the propofol group or the remimazolam group. Blood tests were conducted to evaluate changes in lactate, blood lipids, liver and kidney function, and inflammatory markers, and patients' vital signs were observed over several periods. This study compared the incidence of delirium, the impact on liver and kidney function, circulatory effects, and changes in blood lipids between the two groups. These findings have optimised the selection of medications, providing ICU patients with more options for sedation therapy.
Methods: In this single-centre randomised controlled trial, intubated patients were randomly assigned to the remimazolam group or the propofol group. Under the same analgesic regimen, the two groups received remimazolam and propofol for procedural sedation.
Results: Our primary outcome was the mean arterial pressure (MAP), which significantly differed on Days 4 and 7 (P = 0.021, control group vs. experimental group = 85.23 ± 11.24 vs. 94.36 ± 13.18, P = 0.023, 83.55 ± 8.94 vs. 92.66 ± 7.02). With respect to liver and kidney function, the ∆AST value in the remimazolam group was significantly lower than that in the control group on Day 7 (P = 0.023). There were significant differences in triglyceride (TG) levels on Days 4 and 7 (P = 0.020) and in the ∆LDL on Day 7 (P = 0.027). Furthermore, the rates of dyslipidaemia and delirium in the remimazolam group were lower than those in the propofol group (85.0%, n = 40 vs. 90.0%, n = 40; 27.5%, n = 40 vs. 55%, n = 40).
Conclusion: Remimazolam is a novel benzodiazepine that has demonstrated promising applications in general anaesthesia and procedural sedation; however, its use in ICU sedation is still in the early stages of research. Current evidence suggests that remimazolam is a safe sedative that is particularly well suited for patients with haemodynamic instability. Large sample-size randomised clinical trials are warranted.
Keywords: Analgesia and sedation; Intensive care unit; Propofol; Remimazolam.
© 2025. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
Declarations. Ethics approval and consent to participate: This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Affiliated Hospital of Yanbian University (2021151). This clinical study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (CTR2400091004). Informed consent was obtained from the study participants before enrolment. Consent for publication: All authors approved the final version submitted for publication and agreed to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved. Competing interests: The authors declare that there are no competing interests associated with the manuscript.
Figures





References
-
- Sydow M, Neumann P. Sedation for the critically ill. Intensive Care Med. 1999;25(6):634. - PubMed
-
- Devlin J, Skrobik Y, Gélinas C, Needham D, Slooter A, Pandharipande P, Watson P, Weinhouse G, Nunnally M, Rochwerg B, et al. Clinical practice guidelines for the prevention and management of pain, agitation/sedation, delirium, immobility, and sleep disruption in adult patients in the ICU. Crit Care Med. 2018;46(9):e825–73. - PubMed
-
- Frank L, Strote J, Hauff S, Bigelow S, Fay K. Propofol by infusion protocol for ED procedural sedation. Am J Emerg Med. 2006;24(5):599–602. - PubMed
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources