Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Nov 22;103(47):e40485.
doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000040485.

Phantom evaluation of feasibility and applicability of artificial intelligence based pulmonary nodule detection in chest radiographs

Affiliations

Phantom evaluation of feasibility and applicability of artificial intelligence based pulmonary nodule detection in chest radiographs

Mona El-Gedaily et al. Medicine (Baltimore). .

Abstract

The aim of our study was to evaluate the specific performance of an artificial intelligence (AI) algorithm for lung nodule detection in chest radiography for a larger number of nodules of different sizes and densities using a standardized phantom approach. A total of 450 nodules with varying density (d1 to d3) and size (3, 5, 8, 10 and 12 mm) were inserted in a Lungman phantom at various locations. Radiographic images with varying projections were acquired and processed using the AI algorithm for nodule detection. Computed tomography (CT) was performed for correlation. Ground truth (detectability) was established through a human consensus reading. Overall sensitivity and specificity of 0.978 and 0.812, respectively, were achieved for nodule detection. The false-positive rate was low with an overall rate of 0.19. The overall accuracy was calculated as 0.84 for all nodules. While most studies evaluating AI performance in the detection of pulmonary nodules have evaluated a mix of varying nodules, these are the first results of a controlled phantom-based study using a balanced number of nodules of all sizes and densities. To increase the radiologist's diagnostic performance and minimize the risk of decision bias, such algorithms have an obvious benefit in a clinical scenario.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Lungman phantom showing artificial chest cavity and vascular/mediastinal inlay.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Lung nodule phantom inlay demonstrating nodules of 5 different sizes and 3 different densities, respectively.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
10 mm sphere (d1) in right lower lung tagged by the algorithm.

References

    1. Miró Catalina Q, Vidal-Alaball J, Fuster-Casanovas A, Escalé-Besa A, Ruiz Comellas A, Solé-Casals J. Real-world testing of an artificial intelligence algorithm for the analysis of chest X-rays in primary care settings. Sci Rep. 2024;14:5199. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bennani S, Regnard NE, Ventre J, et al. Using AI to improve radiologist performance in detection of abnormalities on chest radiographs. Radiology. 2023;309:e230860. - PubMed
    1. Plesner LL, Müller FC, Nybing JD, et al. Autonomous chest radiograph reporting using AI: estimation of clinical impact. Radiology. 2023;307:e222268. - PubMed
    1. Yoon SH, Park S, Jang S, et al. Use of artificial intelligence in triaging of chest radiographs to reduce radiologists’ workload. Eur Radiol. 2024;34:1094–103. - PubMed
    1. van Leeuwen KG, Schalekamp S, Rutten MJCM, et al. ; Project AIR Working Group. Comparison of commercial AI software performance for radiograph lung nodule detection and bone age prediction. Radiology. 2024;310:e230981. - PubMed

MeSH terms

Grants and funding