Communicating neurological prognosis in the prenatal period: a narrative review and practice guidelines
- PMID: 39809859
- DOI: 10.1038/s41390-025-03805-8
Communicating neurological prognosis in the prenatal period: a narrative review and practice guidelines
Erratum in
-
Correction: Communicating neurological prognosis in the prenatal period: a narrative review and practice guidelines.Pediatr Res. 2025 Jul 23. doi: 10.1038/s41390-025-04316-2. Online ahead of print. Pediatr Res. 2025. PMID: 40702209 No abstract available.
Abstract
Clinicians may face an array of challenges in conducting fetal neurological consultations including prognostic uncertainty, a lack of training in fetal counseling, and limited opportunity to build rapport with families. In this setting, it is critical to employ high-quality, family-centered care to allow expectant parents to make informed decisions. Despite the challenges and gravity of these consultations, there remains limited data outlining best conduct and communication practices. This narrative review aims to summarize relevant literature around counseling within fetal neurology, focusing on three key themes: (1) discussing neurological prognosis and uncertainty, (2) navigating evolving decision making, (3) recognizing bias and understanding patient context. We provide practical recommendations to clinicians conducting fetal neurological counseling and outline future research priorities. IMPACT: Fetal neurological conditions can have a significant impact on child short- and long-term health outcomes. Prenatal consultations are an important venue to discuss information regarding fetal prognosis and decision making with expectant parents. However, there is limited evidence supporting best communication practices within this setting. This review summarizes current literature around expectant parent prognostic communication preferences and outlines practical recommendations and priorities for future research.
© 2025. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to the International Pediatric Research Foundation, Inc.
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests. M.E.L. receives salary support from the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (K23NS116453).
References
-
- Tarui, T. et al. Fetal neurology practice survey: Current practice and the future directions. Pediatr. Neurol. 145, 74–79 (2023). - PubMed
-
- Ream, M. A. & Mulkey, S. B. A neurologist’s practical guide to conducting a fetal consultation. Semin. Pediatr. Neurol. 42, 100957 (2022). - PubMed
-
- Agarwal, S. et al. Prenatal neurological diagnosis: Challenges in neuroimaging, prognostic counseling, and prediction of neurodevelopmental outcomes. Pediatr. Neurol. 142, 60–67 (2023). - PubMed
-
- Arroyo, M. S., Hopkin, R. J., Nagaraj, U. D., Kline-Fath, B. & Venkatesan, C. Fetal brain MRI findings and neonatal outcome of common diagnosis at a tertiary care center. J. Perinatol. 39, 1072–1077 (2019). - PubMed
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
