Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Jan 14;25(1):30.
doi: 10.1186/s12884-025-07151-9.

The clinical value of short-term insemination: a retrospective analysis of 3496 patients

Affiliations

The clinical value of short-term insemination: a retrospective analysis of 3496 patients

Xinyue Zhang et al. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. .

Abstract

Background: The safety and effectiveness of short-term insemination remain a subject of controversy. This study aims to investigate the impact of short-term insemination on both embryo quality and pregnancy outcomes and whether it is necessary to apply short-term insemination to all patients underwent in vitro fertilization (IVF).

Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 3,496 patients from two centers over the period January 2016 to December 2022. Of these, 1307 patients underwent IVF, 1656 patients were treated with short-term IVF, 166 patients received early rescue intracytoplasmic sperm injection (R-ICSI) and 367 patients were treated with ICSI. The clinical and neonatal outcomes were compared between the two groups.

Results: The rate of high-quality embryos was significantly lower in the short-term IVF group compared to the routine IVF group (59.89% vs. 68.16%) (P = 0.000), the rate of blastocyst formation was significantly lower in the short-term IVF group compared to the routine IVF group (44.99% vs. 61.34%) (P = 0.000). There were no significant differences in clinical outcomes or neonatal outcomes between the two groups, irrespective of whether fresh or frozen embryos were used (both P > 0.05). The incidence of ≥ 3PN demonstrated no significant difference between the early R-ICSI and ICSI groups (1.04% vs. 0.66%) (P = 0.114), furthermore, the clinical outcomes were similar in both groups, for both fresh and frozen embryos (both P > 0.05).

Conclusions: For patients with primary fertility, short-term IVF combined with early R-ICSI can effectively prevent potential low fertilization or fertilization failure, reduce the risk of patients with no transferable embryo, avoid the waste of resources and had no adverse effects on neonatal outcomes. However, short-term IVF reduced the oocytes utilization rate in one single oocyte pick-up cycle, for patients with no risk factors for fertilization failure, the overnight fertilization is still one of the most important ways of insemination worthy of affirmation.

Trial registration: NA.

Keywords: Early rescue intracytoplasmic sperm injection; Embryo quality; Pregnancy outcome; Short-term in vitro fertilization.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations. Ethics approval and consent to participate: All method was conducted according the ethical standards of the declaration Helsinki. The Reproductive Medicine Ethics Committee of the Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University reviewed and approved this study. Informed consent was obtained from all of the participants. Consent for publication: Not applicable. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Flow chart of the study design. IVF: In Vitro Fertilization; ICSI: Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection; late-ICSI: late Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection; R-ICSI: Rescue Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection

Similar articles

References

    1. Qi Z, Liu Y, Yang H, Yang X, Wang H, Liu B, et al. Protective role of m(6)a binding protein YTHDC2 on CCNB2 in manganese-induced spermatogenesis dysfunction. Chemico-Biol Interact. 2022;351:109754. - PubMed
    1. Lazzari E, Baffour B, Chambers GM. Residential proximity to a fertility clinic is independently associated with likelihood of women having ART and IUI treatment. Human reproduction (Oxford. England). 2022;37(11):2662–71. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cox CM, Thoma ME, Tchangalova N, Mburu G, Bornstein MJ, Johnson CL, et al. Infertility prevalence and the methods of estimation from 1990 to 2021: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod open. 2022;2022(4):hoac051. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Graham ME, Jelin A, Hoon AH Jr., Floet W, Levey AM, Graham E. Assisted reproductive technology: short- and long-term outcomes. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2023;65(1):38–49. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Zhou Y, Gu Z, Liu C, Yang S, Ma X, Chen Q, et al. A polymeric nanobeacon for monitoring the fluctuation of Hydrogen Polysulfides during fertilization and Embryonic Development. Angewandte Chemie (International ed English). 2022;61(16):e202114504. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources