Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Dec 24;18(1):101015.
doi: 10.1016/j.waojou.2024.101015. eCollection 2025 Jan.

Allergen immunotherapy in Italy: How, when, and why-A real-world study conducted through a patient association

Affiliations

Allergen immunotherapy in Italy: How, when, and why-A real-world study conducted through a patient association

Giovanni Paoletti et al. World Allergy Organ J. .

Abstract

Background: Allergen immunotherapy (AIT) is the only treatment that modifies the natural course of allergies. However, AIT is only used in some eligible patients, is frequently underused, and only a few studies investigated this aspects. Understanding AIT utilization patterns might disclose information about why it is underused, thus providing valuable insights on how to broaden the positive impact it can have on the population.

Methods: A questionnaire aiming to assess the trends of the use of AIT in Italy, patient health literacy on AIT, and the impact of respiratory allergies and AIT on patients' lives was submitted to patients affiliated with Respiriamo Insieme APS patient's association during the period between May and October 2023.

Results: Nine hundred forty-four patients completed the questionnaire. Most patients reported to be affected by allergic rhinitis (81.1%), allergic asthma (45.4%), and/or allergic conjunctivitis (41.2%), and many of them presenting a combination of these diseases. Only 53.8% knew about AIT's existence, and AIT was proposed to only 33.1% of the 858 patients affected by allergic rhinitis and/or allergic asthma, of which 29.2% decided not to initiate the therapy. Common reasons for AIT refusal were related to indecisiveness (26.5%), costs (22.9%), and skepticism (19.3%). Among the remaining 70.8% who accepted to start AIT, 21.4% discontinued the treatment beforehand, on average 18.26 months from initiation. There was a high heterogeneity in the suggested duration of AIT, with 20.4% of patients receiving indications to continue AIT for less than 3 years. AIT positively impacted patients' lives as most patients who completed AIT found it effective and safe, and experienced a significant reduction in the workdays/schooldays lost due to disease exacerbations.

Conclusions: The outcomes of this research pointed out a lot of misinformation surrounding AIT, calling for improvements in awareness and information on its efficacy and safety. Also, we noted a significant reduction in work/school days lost in patients who completed AIT and a good patient-reported safety and efficacy profile. We advocate for better economic accessibility through national-level standardization in treatment refundability. Notably, the collaboration with the patient association was crucial, and it would have been challenging to conduct this research otherwise.

Keywords: Allergen immunotherapy; Allergic rhinitis; Asthma; Costs; Effectiveness.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Giovanni Paoletti reports fees for speaker activities and/or advisory boards participation from Lofarma, GSK, and AstraZeneca, outside the submitted work. Mattia Giovanini reports personal fees from Sanofi, outside the submitted work. Giorgio Walter Canonica reports research or clinical trials grants paid to his Institution from Menarini, AstraZeneca,GSK, Sanofi Genzyme and fees for lectures or advisory board participation from Menarini, AstraZeneca, CellTrion, Chiesi, Faes Farma, Firma, Genentech, Guidotti-Malesci, GSK, HAL Allergy, Innovacaremd, Novartis, OM-Pharma, Red Maple, Sanofi-Aventis, Sanofi-Genzyme, Stallergenes-Greer and Uriach Pharma, outside the submitted work. Enrico Heffler reports fees for speaker activities and/or advisory boards participation from Sanofi, Regeneron, GSK, Novartis, AstraZeneca, Stallergenes-Greer, Chiesi, Almirall, Bosch, Lofarma, outside the sumitted work. Emanuele Nappi, Maria Chiara Bragato, Paola Valli, Domenico Gargano, Luca Pecoraro, Deborah Diso and Simona Barbaglia report no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Distribution of patients' sensitizations. HDM: House Dust Mites
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
How patients learned about allergen immunotherapy existence
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Reasons behind allergen immunotherapy refusal
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Allergens for which allergen immunotherapy was started (right panel) and administration routes (left panel)
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Duration of allergen immunotherapy prescription
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
Reasons behind allergen immunotherapy discontinuation
Fig. 7
Fig. 7
Perceived efficacy (upper panel) and safety (lower panel) of allergen immunotherapy in patients who completed it
Fig. 8
Fig. 8
Workdays/schooldays lost before and after allergen immunotherapy

References

    1. Bauchau V., Durham S.R. Prevalence and rate of diagnosis of allergic rhinitis in Europe. Eur Respir J. 2004;24(5):758–764. - PubMed
    1. Platts-Mills TAE The allergy epidemics: 1870-2010. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2015;136(1):3–13. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Prescott S.L., Pawankar R., Allen K.J., et al. A global survey of changing patterns of food allergy burden in children. World Allergy Organ J. 2013;6(1):21. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Pawankar R. Allergic diseases and asthma: a global public health concern and a call to action. World Allergy Organ J. 2014;7(1):12. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Siroux V., Boudier A., Anto J.M., et al. Quality-of-life and asthma-severity in general population asthmatics: results of the ECRHS II study. Allergy. 2008;63(5):547–554. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources