Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Dec 15:14:103111.
doi: 10.1016/j.mex.2024.103111. eCollection 2025 Jun.

Numerical and experimental methods for the assessment of a human finger-inspired soft pneumatic actuator for gripping applications

Affiliations

Numerical and experimental methods for the assessment of a human finger-inspired soft pneumatic actuator for gripping applications

Subraya Krishna Bhat et al. MethodsX. .

Abstract

The increasing demand for soft robotic systems in agricultural, biomedical and other applications has driven the development of actuators that can mimic the flexibility and adaptability of human muscles. Several studies have explored the design and implementation of soft actuators for robotic applications, however, there is a need for soft actuators demonstrating delicate gripping capabilities but also excel in specific biomedical applications, such as therapeutic massaging. The objective of this work is to develop a multi-finger soft pneumatic actuator mimicking human fingers for Ayurvedic therapeutic massaging and gripping applications. The actuator is geometrically modeled to mimic the dexterity and flexibility of a human finger and its mechanical behavior such as bending angle and gripping force under air pressure is studied through finite element analysis (FEA). The simulation results are experimentally validated. The finger-based actuator is fabricated using liquid silicone rubber, and its performance namely, bending deformation and gripping force generated at various pressure is determined and these results are compared with the simulated test cases. The study also provides a detailed analysis of the performance of the actuator, thus providing detailed insights into its applicability in therapeutic purposes.•Human finger inspired actuators are expected to demonstrate the dexterity and flexibility of human hands, which poses challenges in its modeling and analysis.•The load carrying capacity and bending movements of the actuator is assessed using numerical method of Finite Element Analysis.•Simulation results are validated through an experimental method using force sensors and image analysis of the bending movement of the soft actuator.

Keywords: Biomedical; Finite element method; Gripper; Numerical and experimental methods; Pneumatic; Soft actuator; Soft robotics.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Figures

Image, graphical abstract
Graphical abstract
Fig 1
Fig. 1
Geometric model of the proposed actuator.
Fig 2
Fig. 2
The soft actuator and human hand CAD models for massaging simulation.
Fig 3
Fig. 3
(a) The inner walls of the actuator subjected to fluid pressure and (b) outer walls highlighted with possible interaction (contacts).
Fig 4
Fig. 4
Meshed model of the actuator.
Fig 5
Fig. 5
Prescribed boundary conditions used for (a) contact force and (b) massing analysis: the blue colored portions are constrained in all directions.
Fig 6
Fig. 6
Fabricated soft actuator.
Fig 7
Fig. 7
(a) Experimental setup for force sensing resistor readings, (b) circuit for force sensing sensor readings.
Fig 8
Fig. 8
(a) Bending angle variations obtained in the FE simulations at different pressures with respect to time, bending profiles obtained at (b) 60 kPa and (c) 100 kPa.
Fig 9
Fig. 9
(a) The bending angle variation with inflation pressures, (b) absolute percentage error between numerical and experimental results at different pressure levels.
Fig 10
Fig. 10
(a) Bending angle variations obtained in experiments, (b) bending deformations observed at various pressures.
Fig 11
Fig. 11
Reaction force variations obtained in the FE simulations at different pressures with respect to time.
Fig 12
Fig. 12
Reaction force variations obtained in the experiments at different pressures with time.
Fig 13
Fig. 13
Total deformation (in m) observed in the human arm model.
Fig 14
Fig. 14
Linearized equivalent stress along the length of the actuator obtained in FE simulations.
Fig 15
Fig. 15
Average equivalent (a) stress and (b) strain variations obtained in the FE simulations at different pressures with respect to time.
Fig 16
Fig. 16
(a) Three-finger actuator, actuator (b) before and (c) after pressurization.

References

    1. Majidi C. Soft-matter engineering for soft robotics. Adv. Mater. Technol. 2019 4.2.
    1. Feinberg A.W. Biological soft robotics. Annu. Rev. Biomed. Eng. 2015:243–265. 17.1. - PubMed
    1. Radder B., et al. Home rehabilitation supported by a wearable soft-robotic device for improving hand function in older adults: a pilot randomized controlled trial. PLoS One. 2019 14.8. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Van der Loos H.F.M., Reinkensmeyer D.J., Guglielmelli E. Rehabilitation and health care robotics. Spring. Handb. Robot. 2016:1685–1728.
    1. Bedaf S., et al. Robotic Assistive Technologies. CRC Press; 2017. Robots supporting care for elderly people; pp. 309–332.

LinkOut - more resources