Bipolar vs. monopolar sealer in decreasing blood loss and transfusion rate in patients undergoing two-stage exchange in infected total knee arthroplasty: propensity score-matched study
- PMID: 39812658
- DOI: 10.1007/s00402-024-05685-9
Bipolar vs. monopolar sealer in decreasing blood loss and transfusion rate in patients undergoing two-stage exchange in infected total knee arthroplasty: propensity score-matched study
Abstract
Background: Two-stage revision in infected total knee arthroplasty increases the risk of blood loss and the need for transfusion. The present study aimed to test the hemostatic efficacy of a bipolar sealer to reduce blood loss and transfusion requirements after the first stage in patients affected by peri-prosthetic knee infections.
Methods: Twenty-four patients undergoing 2-stage arthroplasty for infected TKA using a bipolar sealer (Haemodiss, Kylix, Naples, IT) were compared with 24 patients of a historical control group in which conventional electrocautery was used. Transfusion data, clinical information, and operative data were evaluated. The primary outcome measure was estimated blood loss at the time of the lowest hemoglobin level (nadir). The secondary outcome measures were the transfusion requirement and the number of units transfused.
Results: The total blood loss was significantly lower in the prospective bipolar sealer group than the control group (1.19 (IQR 1.03-1.93) vs. 1.75 (IQR 1.13-2.07) L; p = 0.022). The transfusion rate was 8% in the bipolar sealer group, whereas 33% in the control group (p = 0.036). Furthermore, the mean number of blood units transfused was higher in the control group (0.4 ± 0.7 vs. 0.08 ± 0.3; p < 0.01). The Baseline Hematocrit and Operative time were directly associated with blood loss, whereas the bipolar use represented inverse predictor using multiple linear regression analysis.
Conclusion: After the first stage of a two-stage exchange for periprosthetic knee infection, several factors influence postoperative blood loss, including preoperative HCT level and operative time. The bipolar sealer effectively supports hemostasis, thus reducing blood loss and the need for transfusions.
Keywords: Bipolar sealer; Blood loss; Periprosthetic joint infection; Two-stage exchange.
© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.
Conflict of interest statement
Declarations. Ethical approval: The Internal Review Board of the Department of Public Health assembled on 16th March 2022 declared the study compliant with ethical requirements as the device described is routinely used in orthopaedic surgery. Informed consent: All patients provided informed consent before enrolment in the study. Competing interests: The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.
Similar articles
-
No Effect of a Bipolar Sealer on Total Blood Loss or Blood Transfusion in Nonseptic Revision Knee Arthroplasty-A Prospective Study With Matched Retrospective Controls.J Arthroplasty. 2017 Jan;32(1):177-182. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2016.06.037. Epub 2016 Jul 1. J Arthroplasty. 2017. PMID: 27554781
-
Bipolar Sealers Do not Improve Blood Loss or Functional Outcomes of Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty.J Knee Surg. 2020 Jan;33(1):62-66. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1676516. Epub 2018 Dec 21. J Knee Surg. 2020. PMID: 30577050 Clinical Trial.
-
Hemostasis using a bipolar sealer in primary unilateral total knee arthroplasty.Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2009 Dec;38(12):E179-83. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2009. PMID: 20145794 Clinical Trial.
-
The Efficacy of Bipolar Sealer on Blood Loss in Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Meta-Analysis.Medicine (Baltimore). 2016 May;95(19):e3435. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000003435. Medicine (Baltimore). 2016. PMID: 27175643 Free PMC article.
-
The efficacy of bipolar sealer on blood loss in spine surgery: a meta-analysis.Eur Spine J. 2017 Jul;26(7):1796-1802. doi: 10.1007/s00586-017-5045-3. Epub 2017 Mar 18. Eur Spine J. 2017. PMID: 28315968 Review.
References
-
- Wignadasan W, Ibrahim M, Haddad FS (2023) One- or two-stage reimplantation for infected total knee prosthesis? Orthop Traumatol Surg Res OTSR 109:103453. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otsr.2022.103453 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Dennis DA, Berry DJ, Engh G et al (2008) Revision total knee arthroplasty. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 16:442–454. https://doi.org/10.5435/00124635-200808000-00003 - DOI - PubMed
-
- George J, Sikora M, Masch J et al (2017) Infection is not a risk factor for Perioperative and postoperative blood loss and transfusion in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 32:214–219e1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2016.06.046 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Pagnano M, Cushner FD, Hansen A et al (1999) Blood management in two-stage revision knee arthroplasty for deep prosthetic infection. Clin Orthop (367):238–242.
-
- White CC, Eichinger JK, Friedman RJ (2018) Minimizing blood loss and transfusions in total knee arthroplasty. J Knee Surg 31:594–599. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0038-1648223 - DOI - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical