Screening for Structural Heart Defects: A Single-Center Retrospective Cost Analysis for Fetal Echocardiography in Adults with Congenital Heart Disease
- PMID: 39812797
- DOI: 10.1007/s00246-024-03765-6
Screening for Structural Heart Defects: A Single-Center Retrospective Cost Analysis for Fetal Echocardiography in Adults with Congenital Heart Disease
Abstract
Fetal echocardiography (FE) is recommended for parents with congenital heart disease (pCHD) due to a 3-6% recurrence risk of congenital heart disease (CHD). This study aimed to evaluate the cost of FE for detecting neonatal CHD in pCHD. FE data were collected between 12/2015 and 12/2022. Parents were stratified by CHD complexity: "simple" (class I) and "complex" (class II/III). Cost analysis compared universal FE with selective FE following a positive level II screening anatomical ultrasound (SAU). Primary outcomes included the cost and number needed to screen (NNT) to detect one case of neonatal CHD. Of 419 pCHD cases, 48 were analyzed separately due to additional FE indications. Among the remaining 371 cases (73% maternal, 27% paternal; mean maternal age: 31 years), 14 postnatal CHD cases were detected (3.8%). Recurrence rates were 1.9% for simple pCHD (n = 156) and 5.1% for complex pCHD (n = 215). Universal FE increased the cost of detecting neonatal CHD. The cost per detected case was $267,157 for simple CHD (NNT = 560) and $135,125 for complex CHD (NNT = 288). The lower sensitivity of SAU reduced the cost of universal FE. In this single-center cohort, the recurrence risk of CHD in pCHD is higher than in the general population, particularly in complex cases. Universal screening in simple pCHD is costlier with high-sensitivity SAU. Targeted screening in complex pCHD may offer a better cost-to-risk ratio, highlighting the need for early detection to improve outcomes. The cost effectiveness is dependent on local SAU sensitivity rates.
Keywords: Adult congenital heart disease; Congenital heart disease; Cost analysis; Fetal echocardiology; Screening anatomical ultrasound; Sensitivity analysis.
© 2025. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.
Conflict of interest statement
Declarations. Conflict of interest: The authors declare no competing interests. Declaration of Generative AI and AI-assisted technologies in the writing process: During the preparation of this work, the authors used GPT3.5 (OpenAI) to reword and rephrase text. After using this tool/service, the authors reviewed and edited the content as needed and take full responsibility for the content of the publication. Ethical Approval: This study was reviewed and approved by the University of Washington institutional review board (STUDY00002618). Informed consent was waived due to the retrospective nature of the study.
Similar articles
-
Impact of maternal obesity on fetal cardiac screening: which follow-up strategy is cost-effective?Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Nov;56(5):705-716. doi: 10.1002/uog.21895. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2020. PMID: 31614030
-
Reducing the cost of detection of congenital heart disease in fetuses of women with pregestational diabetes mellitus.Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Jun;33(6):676-82. doi: 10.1002/uog.6302. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2009. PMID: 19479684
-
Cost-effectiveness of prenatal screening methods for congenital heart defects in pregnancies conceived by in-vitro fertilization.Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Jun;57(6):979-986. doi: 10.1002/uog.22048. Epub 2021 May 5. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2021. PMID: 32304621
-
Prenatal diagnosis of congenital heart defects: echocardiography.Transl Pediatr. 2021 Aug;10(8):2210-2224. doi: 10.21037/tp-20-164. Transl Pediatr. 2021. PMID: 34584892 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Association between advanced paternal age and congenital heart defects: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Hum Reprod. 2020 Sep 1;35(9):2113. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deaa105. Hum Reprod. 2020. PMID: 32730591
References
-
- Calcara S, Paeltz A, Richards B, Sisk T, Stiver C, Ogunleye O, Texter K, Mah ML, Cua CL (2024) The utility of screening fetal echocardiograms following normal level II ultrasounds in fetuses with maternal congenital heart disease. Cardiol Ther 13:163–171. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40119-024-00350-z - DOI - PubMed - PMC
-
- Oyen N, Boyd HA, Carstensen L, Sondergaard L, Wohlfahrt J, Melbye M (2022) Risk of congenital heart defects in offspring of affected mothers and fathers. Circ Genom Precis Med 15:e003533. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCGEN.121.003533 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
-
- Calcagni G, Digilio MC, Sarkozy A, Dallapiccola B, Marino B (2007) Familial recurrence of congenital heart disease: an overview and review of the literature. Eur J Pediatr 166:111–116. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00431-006-0295-9 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Fesslova V, Brankovic J, Lalatta F, Villa L, Meli V, Piazza L, Ricci C (2011) Recurrence of congenital heart disease in cases with familial risk screened prenatally by echocardiography. J Pregnancy 2011:368067. https://doi.org/10.1155/2011/368067 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
-
- Gill HK, Splitt M, Sharland GK, Simpson JM (2003) Patterns of recurrence of congenital heart disease: an analysis of 6,640 consecutive pregnancies evaluated by detailed fetal echocardiography. J Am Coll Cardiol 42:923–929. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0735-1097(03)00853-2 - DOI - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources