Intrauterine devices: medicated and nonmedicated
- PMID: 39813
- DOI: 10.1002/j.1879-3479.1979.tb00954.x
Intrauterine devices: medicated and nonmedicated
Abstract
The main benefits of intrauterine devices (IUDs) are a lack of adverse systemic effects, excellent effectiveness, high continuation rates and the single act of motivation required for use. First year failure rates range from 2% to 3%, but decline steadily thereafter to a cumulative annual failure rate of less than 1% after six years. The risks of IUDs include increased blood loss, uterine perforation, pelvic infection and pregnancy-related complications. The incidence of perforation of the uterine fundus ranges from 1:1000 to 1:2500 insertions, while that of cervical perforation with the copper devices ranges from 1:600 to 1:1000. IUD use is associated with about a three-fold increased incidence of developing acute salpingitis in comparison with use of oral contraceptives and diaphragms. If pregnancy occurs with an IUD in place, there is a three-fold increased risk of spontaneous abortion, a ten-fold increased risk of ectopic pregnancy (5% of all IUD pregnancies) and a possible increased incidence of sepsis during the pregnancy.
Similar articles
-
Intrauterine devices.Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 1979 Apr;6(1):27-37. Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 1979. PMID: 383348 Review. No abstract available.
-
Intrauterine devices.Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 1984 Dec;11(3):679-700. Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 1984. PMID: 6509856 No abstract available.
-
Intrauterine devices: an effective alternative to oral hormonal contraception.Prescrire Int. 2009 Jun;18(101):125-30. Prescrire Int. 2009. PMID: 19637436
-
[Intrauterine devices].Rev Prat. 1980 Dec 11;30(57):3981-2, 3985-7. Rev Prat. 1980. PMID: 7455547 French.
-
Biologic effects of intrauterine devices.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1968 Feb 1;100(3):448-59. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(15)33713-3. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1968. PMID: 15782465 Review. No abstract available.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources