Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2025 Jan-Jun:795:108531.
doi: 10.1016/j.mrrev.2025.108531. Epub 2025 Jan 13.

Inverse dose protraction effects of low-LET radiation: Evidence and significance

Affiliations
Review

Inverse dose protraction effects of low-LET radiation: Evidence and significance

Nobuyuki Hamada et al. Mutat Res Rev Mutat Res. 2025 Jan-Jun.

Abstract

Biological effects of ionizing radiation vary not merely with total dose but also with temporal dose distribution. Sparing dose protraction effects, in which dose protraction reduces effects of radiation have widely been accepted and generally assumed in radiation protection, particularly for stochastic effects (e.g., solid cancer). In contrast, inverse dose protraction effects (IDPEs) in which dose protraction enhances radiation effects have not been well recognized, nor comprehensively reviewed. Here, we review the current knowledge on IDPEs of low linear energy transfer (LET) radiation. To the best of our knowledge, since 1952, 157 biology, epidemiology or clinical papers have reported IDPEs following external or internal low-LET irradiation with photons (X-rays, γ-rays), β-rays, electrons, protons or helium ions. IDPEs of low-LET radiation have been described for biochemical changes in cell-free macromolecules (DNA, proteins or lipids), DNA damage responses in bacteria and yeasts, DNA damage, cytogenetic changes, neoplastic transformation and cell death in mammalian cell cultures of human, rodent or bovine origin, mutagenesis in silkworms, cytogenetic changes, induction of cancer (solid tumors and leukemia) and non-cancer effects (male sterility, cataracts and diseases of the circulatory system), tumor inactivation and survival in non-human mammals (rodents, rabbits, dogs and pigs), and induction of cancer and non-cancer effects (skin changes and diseases of the circulatory system) in humans. In contrast to a growing body of phenomenological evidence for manifestations of IDPEs, there is limited knowledge on mechanistic underpinnings, but proposed mechanisms involve cell cycle-dependent resensitization and low dose hyper-radiosensitivity. These necessitate continued studies for further mechanistic developments and assessment of implications of scientific evidence for radiation protection (e.g., in terms of a dose rate effectiveness factor).

Keywords: Dose rate; Fraction; Inverse dose protraction effects; Ionizing radiation; Low-LET; Temporal dose distribution.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Young RW, Kerr GD. Reassessment of the atomic bomb radiation dosimetry for Hiroshima and Nagasaki – Dosimetry System 2002 (DS02), Report of the Joint US-Japan Working Group, RERF, Hiroshima, 2005. pp. i-x + 1–998. 〈https://www.rerf.or.jp/en/library/list-e/scids/ds02-en/〉.
    1. UNSCEAR. UNSCEAR 2020/2021 Report. Sources, Effects and Risks of Ionizing Radiation. Annex A. Evaluation of medical exposure to ionizing radiation. Vienna: (2022).
    1. UNSCEAR. UNSCEAR 2020/2021 Report. Sources, Effects and Risks of Ionizing Radiation. Annex D. Evaluation of occupational exposure to ionizing radiation. Vienna: (2022).
    1. UNSCEAR. UNSCEAR 2008 Report. Sources, Effects and Risks of Ionizing Radiation. Annex B. exposures of the public and workers from various sources of radiation. Vienna: (2008).
    1. Rühm W, Azizova T, Bouffler S, Cullings HM, Grosche B, Little MP, Shore RS, Walsh L, Woloschak GE, Typical doses and dose rates in studies pertinent to radiation risk inference at low doses and low dose rates, J. Radiat. Res 59 (_2) (2018) ii1–ii10, 10.1093/jrr/rrx093. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources