Inverse dose protraction effects of low-LET radiation: Evidence and significance
- PMID: 39814314
- PMCID: PMC12124966
- DOI: 10.1016/j.mrrev.2025.108531
Inverse dose protraction effects of low-LET radiation: Evidence and significance
Abstract
Biological effects of ionizing radiation vary not merely with total dose but also with temporal dose distribution. Sparing dose protraction effects, in which dose protraction reduces effects of radiation have widely been accepted and generally assumed in radiation protection, particularly for stochastic effects (e.g., solid cancer). In contrast, inverse dose protraction effects (IDPEs) in which dose protraction enhances radiation effects have not been well recognized, nor comprehensively reviewed. Here, we review the current knowledge on IDPEs of low linear energy transfer (LET) radiation. To the best of our knowledge, since 1952, 157 biology, epidemiology or clinical papers have reported IDPEs following external or internal low-LET irradiation with photons (X-rays, γ-rays), β-rays, electrons, protons or helium ions. IDPEs of low-LET radiation have been described for biochemical changes in cell-free macromolecules (DNA, proteins or lipids), DNA damage responses in bacteria and yeasts, DNA damage, cytogenetic changes, neoplastic transformation and cell death in mammalian cell cultures of human, rodent or bovine origin, mutagenesis in silkworms, cytogenetic changes, induction of cancer (solid tumors and leukemia) and non-cancer effects (male sterility, cataracts and diseases of the circulatory system), tumor inactivation and survival in non-human mammals (rodents, rabbits, dogs and pigs), and induction of cancer and non-cancer effects (skin changes and diseases of the circulatory system) in humans. In contrast to a growing body of phenomenological evidence for manifestations of IDPEs, there is limited knowledge on mechanistic underpinnings, but proposed mechanisms involve cell cycle-dependent resensitization and low dose hyper-radiosensitivity. These necessitate continued studies for further mechanistic developments and assessment of implications of scientific evidence for radiation protection (e.g., in terms of a dose rate effectiveness factor).
Keywords: Dose rate; Fraction; Inverse dose protraction effects; Ionizing radiation; Low-LET; Temporal dose distribution.
Copyright © 2025 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Similar articles
-
Inverse dose protraction effects of high-LET radiation: Evidence and significance.Mutat Res Rev Mutat Res. 2025 Jan-Jun;795:108530. doi: 10.1016/j.mrrev.2025.108530. Epub 2025 Jan 14. Mutat Res Rev Mutat Res. 2025. PMID: 39818312 Review.
-
Dose protraction studies with low- and high-LET radiations on neoplastic cell transformation in vitro.Adv Space Res. 1986;6(11):137-47. doi: 10.1016/0273-1177(86)90286-3. Adv Space Res. 1986. PMID: 11537213
-
Commentary 2 to Cox and Little: radiation-induced oncogenic transformation: the interplay between dose, dose protraction, and radiation quality.Adv Radiat Biol. 1992;16:167-79. doi: 10.1016/b978-0-12-035416-0.50012-4. Adv Radiat Biol. 1992. PMID: 11537507 Review.
-
Biological effects in normal human fibroblasts following chronic and acute irradiation with both low- and high-LET radiation.Front Public Health. 2024 Oct 22;12:1404748. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1404748. eCollection 2024. Front Public Health. 2024. PMID: 39502827 Free PMC article.
-
Characterisation of Deubiquitylating Enzymes in the Cellular Response to High-LET Ionizing Radiation and Complex DNA Damage.Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2019 Jul 1;104(3):656-665. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2019.02.053. Epub 2019 Mar 7. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2019. PMID: 30851349 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Biological effects of high-LET irradiation on the circulatory system.Int J Radiat Biol. 2025;101(5):429-452. doi: 10.1080/09553002.2025.2470947. Epub 2025 Mar 10. Int J Radiat Biol. 2025. PMID: 40063776 Review.
-
Responses of the carotid artery to acute, fractionated or chronic ionizing irradiation, and differences from the aorta.Sci Rep. 2025 Mar 5;15(1):7712. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-92710-5. Sci Rep. 2025. PMID: 40044924 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Young RW, Kerr GD. Reassessment of the atomic bomb radiation dosimetry for Hiroshima and Nagasaki – Dosimetry System 2002 (DS02), Report of the Joint US-Japan Working Group, RERF, Hiroshima, 2005. pp. i-x + 1–998. 〈https://www.rerf.or.jp/en/library/list-e/scids/ds02-en/〉.
-
- UNSCEAR. UNSCEAR 2020/2021 Report. Sources, Effects and Risks of Ionizing Radiation. Annex A. Evaluation of medical exposure to ionizing radiation. Vienna: (2022).
-
- UNSCEAR. UNSCEAR 2020/2021 Report. Sources, Effects and Risks of Ionizing Radiation. Annex D. Evaluation of occupational exposure to ionizing radiation. Vienna: (2022).
-
- UNSCEAR. UNSCEAR 2008 Report. Sources, Effects and Risks of Ionizing Radiation. Annex B. exposures of the public and workers from various sources of radiation. Vienna: (2008).
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources