The efficacy and safety of thymosin α1 for sepsis (TESTS): multicentre, double blinded, randomised, placebo controlled, phase 3 trial
- PMID: 39814420
- PMCID: PMC11780596
- DOI: 10.1136/bmj-2024-082583
The efficacy and safety of thymosin α1 for sepsis (TESTS): multicentre, double blinded, randomised, placebo controlled, phase 3 trial
Erratum in
-
The efficacy and safety of thymosin α1 for sepsis (TESTS): multicentre, double blinded, randomised, placebo controlled, phase 3 trial.BMJ. 2025 May 30;389:r1098. doi: 10.1136/bmj.r1098. BMJ. 2025. PMID: 40447307 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate whether the immunomodulatory drug thymosin α1 reduces mortality in adults with sepsis.
Design: Multicentre, double blinded, placebo controlled phase 3 trial.
Setting: 22 centres in China, September 2016 to December 2020.
Participants: 1106 adults aged 18-85 years with a diagnosis of sepsis according to sepsis-3 criteria and randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive thymosin α1 (n=552) or placebo (n=554). A stratified block method was used for randomisation, and participants were stratified by age (<60 and ≥60 years) and centre.
Interventions: Subcutaneous injection of thymosin α1 or placebo every 12 hours for seven days unless discontinued owing to discharge from the intensive care unit, death, or withdrawal of consent.
Main outcome measure: The primary outcome was 28 day all cause mortality after randomisation. All analyses were based on a modified intention-to-treat set, including participants who received at least one dose of study drug.
Results: Of 1106 adults with sepsis enrolled in the study, 1089 were included in the modified intention-to-treat analyses (thymosin α1 group n=542, placebo group n=547). 28 day all cause mortality occurred in 127 participants (23.4%) in the thymosin α1 group and 132 (24.1%) in the placebo group (hazard ratio 0.99, 95% confidence interval 0.77 to 1.27; P=0.93 with log-rank test). No secondary or safety outcome differed statistically significantly between the two groups. The prespecified subgroup analysis showed a potential differential effect of thymosin α1 on the primary outcome based on age (<60 years: hazard ratio 1.67, 1.04 to 2.67; ≥60 years: 0.81, 0.61 to 1.09; P for interaction=0.01) and diabetes (diabetes: 0.58, 0.35 to 0.99; no diabetes: 1.16, 0.87 to 1.53; P for interaction=0.04).
Conclusions: This trial found no clear evidence to suggest that thymosin α1 decreases 28 day all cause mortality in adults with sepsis.
Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02867267.
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interests: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form at https://www.icmje.org/disclosureof-interest/ and declare: support from the Sun Yat-sen University Clinical Research Program 5010, the Guangdong Clinical Research Center for Critical Care Medicine, and SciClone Pharmaceuticals for the submitted work; XG, JW, WL, ZH, Y Li, DZ, MZ, JY, WC, MD, ZW, and QL received grants from SciClone Pharmaceuticals; WL, JZ, and LK received consultancy fees from SciClone Pharmaceuticals, Jiangsu Nhwa Pharmaceutical, and Nutrici; no financial relationships with any organisations that might have an interest in the submitted work in the previous three years; no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.
Figures
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical