Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2025 Jan 15:388:e082583.
doi: 10.1136/bmj-2024-082583.

The efficacy and safety of thymosin α1 for sepsis (TESTS): multicentre, double blinded, randomised, placebo controlled, phase 3 trial

Collaborators, Affiliations
Clinical Trial

The efficacy and safety of thymosin α1 for sepsis (TESTS): multicentre, double blinded, randomised, placebo controlled, phase 3 trial

Jianfeng Wu et al. BMJ. .

Erratum in

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate whether the immunomodulatory drug thymosin α1 reduces mortality in adults with sepsis.

Design: Multicentre, double blinded, placebo controlled phase 3 trial.

Setting: 22 centres in China, September 2016 to December 2020.

Participants: 1106 adults aged 18-85 years with a diagnosis of sepsis according to sepsis-3 criteria and randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive thymosin α1 (n=552) or placebo (n=554). A stratified block method was used for randomisation, and participants were stratified by age (<60 and ≥60 years) and centre.

Interventions: Subcutaneous injection of thymosin α1 or placebo every 12 hours for seven days unless discontinued owing to discharge from the intensive care unit, death, or withdrawal of consent.

Main outcome measure: The primary outcome was 28 day all cause mortality after randomisation. All analyses were based on a modified intention-to-treat set, including participants who received at least one dose of study drug.

Results: Of 1106 adults with sepsis enrolled in the study, 1089 were included in the modified intention-to-treat analyses (thymosin α1 group n=542, placebo group n=547). 28 day all cause mortality occurred in 127 participants (23.4%) in the thymosin α1 group and 132 (24.1%) in the placebo group (hazard ratio 0.99, 95% confidence interval 0.77 to 1.27; P=0.93 with log-rank test). No secondary or safety outcome differed statistically significantly between the two groups. The prespecified subgroup analysis showed a potential differential effect of thymosin α1 on the primary outcome based on age (<60 years: hazard ratio 1.67, 1.04 to 2.67; ≥60 years: 0.81, 0.61 to 1.09; P for interaction=0.01) and diabetes (diabetes: 0.58, 0.35 to 0.99; no diabetes: 1.16, 0.87 to 1.53; P for interaction=0.04).

Conclusions: This trial found no clear evidence to suggest that thymosin α1 decreases 28 day all cause mortality in adults with sepsis.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02867267.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form at https://www.icmje.org/disclosureof-interest/ and declare: support from the Sun Yat-sen University Clinical Research Program 5010, the Guangdong Clinical Research Center for Critical Care Medicine, and SciClone Pharmaceuticals for the submitted work; XG, JW, WL, ZH, Y Li, DZ, MZ, JY, WC, MD, ZW, and QL received grants from SciClone Pharmaceuticals; WL, JZ, and LK received consultancy fees from SciClone Pharmaceuticals, Jiangsu Nhwa Pharmaceutical, and Nutrici; no financial relationships with any organisations that might have an interest in the submitted work in the previous three years; no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1
Flow of participants through study
Fig 2
Fig 2
Kaplan-Meier estimates of time-to-event for death at 28 days (primary outcome) and 90 days from randomisation. Log-rank tests were used for comparisons and the hazard ratios for relative risks of the primary outcome between the two groups, along with corresponding 95% CIs, were calculated using a Cox regression model adjusted for centre and age. The model assumption was assessed using Schoenfeld residuals. CI=confidence interval
Fig 3
Fig 3
Subgroup analyses. A Bonferroni threshold for significance for overall type I error of 0.05 was P=0.006. The HRs for relative risk of primary outcome of the two groups and associated 95% CIs were calculated with a Cox regression model adjusting for centre and age. An interaction term was added between treatment and subgroup in the Cox regression model. CI=confidence interval; COPD=chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
Fig 4
Fig 4
Dynamic change of immune markers in participants with sepsis. Mixed effects model for repeated measures was used to analyse the absolute changes in immune markers: mHLA-DR, lymphocyte count, neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio, and regulatory T cells from screening period to 28 day follow-up. This model included measurements of immune markers on days 7, 14, and 28 as dependent variables (the proportion of regulatory T cells was only measured on day 7), whereas immune marker levels at screening, centre, and age group served as independent variables. mHLA-DR=monocyte human leucocyte antigen-DR

References

    1. Singer M, Deutschman CS, Seymour CW, et al. . The Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3). JAMA 2016;315:801-10. 10.1001/jama.2016.0287. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. van der Poll T, van de Veerdonk FL, Scicluna BP, Netea MG. The immunopathology of sepsis and potential therapeutic targets. Nat Rev Immunol 2017;17:407-20. 10.1038/nri.2017.36. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Guinault D, Nicolau-Travers ML, Silva S, et al. . Expression of Exhaustion Markers on CD8+ T-Cell Patterns Predict Outcomes in Septic Patients Admitted to the ICU. Crit Care Med 2021;49:1513-23. 10.1097/CCM.0000000000005047. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Shankar-Hari M, Calandra T, Soares MP, et al. . Reframing sepsis immunobiology for translation: towards informative subtyping and targeted immunomodulatory therapies. Lancet Respir Med 2024;12:323-36. 10.1016/S2213-2600(23)00468-X. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Marques A, Torre C, Pinto R, Sepodes B, Rocha J. Treatment Advances in Sepsis and Septic Shock: Modulating Pro- and Anti-Inflammatory Mechanisms. J Clin Med 2023;12:2892. 10.3390/jcm12082892. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

Associated data