Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Editorial
. 2025 May;131(6):983-987.
doi: 10.1002/jso.28071. Epub 2025 Jan 15.

Evidence-Based De-Escalation of Radiotherapy in Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer

Affiliations
Editorial

Evidence-Based De-Escalation of Radiotherapy in Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer

Devesh S Ballal et al. J Surg Oncol. 2025 May.

Abstract

Advancements in cancer care have significantly extended the life expectancy of rectal cancer patients and the impact of treatment-related toxicity on long-term quality of life has become a crucial factor in determining the most suitable type of neoadjuvant therapy, particularly for patients who are likely to undergo surgery. While radiotherapy has traditionally been regarded as the cornerstone for achieving improved local control in rectal cancer, it is accompanied by a range of associated complications, including bowel and bladder dysfunction, gonadal ablation, and Low Anterior Resection Syndrome. De-escalation of treatment is undoubtedly beneficial for many patients, and this approach should be tailored to consider their expectations while prioritizing patient care in decision-making. Although there is inadequate data to support the oncologic safety of a watch-and-wait approach without radiation or to omit radiation in patients with suspicious lateral pelvic lymph nodes, sufficient evidence exists to justify de-escalation by avoiding radiation before surgery in many other patients who respond well to chemotherapy.

Keywords: radiotherapy; rectal cancer; treatment de‐escalation.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. R. Sauer, T. Liersch, S. Merkel, et al., “Preoperative Versus Postoperative Chemoradiotherapy for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer: Results of the German CAO/ARO/AIO‐94 Randomized Phase III Trial After a Median Follow‐up of 11 Years,” Journal of Clinical Oncology 30, no. 16 (2012): 1926–1933, https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2011.40.1836.
    1. A. Nicotera, E. Falletto, A. Arezzo, M. Mistrangelo, R. Passera, and M. Morino, “Risk Factors for Low Anterior Resection Syndrome (LARS) in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Surgery for Rectal Cancer,” Surgical Endoscopy 36, no. 8 (2022): 6059–6066, https://doi.org/10.1007/S00464-021-09002-Y.
    1. L. Zhao, R. Liu, Z. Zhang, et al., “Oxaliplatin/Fluorouracil‐Based Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer After Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy and Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials,” Colorectal Disease 18, no. 8 (2016): 763–772, https://doi.org/10.1111/CODI.13381.
    1. M. Brændengen, K. M. Tveit, K. Bruheim, M. Cvancarova, Å. Berglund, and B. Glimelius, “Late Patient‐Reported Toxicity After Preoperative Radiotherapy or Chemoradiotherapy in Nonresectable Rectal Cancer: Results From a Randomized Phase III Study,” International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics 81, no. 4 (2011): 1017–1024, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.07.007.
    1. R. L. Siegel, L. A. Torre, I. Soerjomataram, et al., “Global Patterns and Trends in Colorectal Cancer Incidence in Young Adults,” Gut 68, no. 12 (2019): 2179–2185, https://doi.org/10.1136/GUTJNL-2019-319511.

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources