Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2025 Jan 15:13:tkae081.
doi: 10.1093/burnst/tkae081. eCollection 2025.

Haemodynamic management of septic shock

Affiliations
Review

Haemodynamic management of septic shock

Yuki Kotani et al. Burns Trauma. .

Abstract

Septic shock is a significant challenge in the management of patients with burns and traumatic injuries when complicated by infection, necessitating prompt and effective haemodynamic support. This review provides a comprehensive overview of current strategies for vasopressor and fluid management in septic shock, with the aim to optimize patient outcomes. With regard to vasopressor management, we elaborate on the pharmacologic profiles and clinical applications of catecholamines, vasopressin derivatives, angiotensin II, and other vasoactive agents. Noradrenaline remains central to septic shock management. The addition of vasopressin, when sequentially added to noradrenaline, offers a non-catecholaminergic vasoactive effect with some clinical benefits and risks of adverse effects. Emerging agents such as angiotensin II and hydroxocobalamin are highlighted for their roles in catecholamine-resistant vasodilatory shock. Next, for fluid management, crystalloids are currently preferred for initial resuscitation, with balanced crystalloids showing benefits over saline. The application of albumin in septic shock warrants further research. High-quality evidence does not support large-volume fluid resuscitation, and an individualized strategy based on haemodynamic parameters, including lactate clearance and capillary refill time, is recommended. The existing knowledge suggests that early vasopressor initiation, particularly noradrenaline, may be critical in cases where fluid resuscitation takes inadequate effect. Management of refractory septic shock remains challenging, with novel agents like angiotensin II and methylene blue showing potential in recent studies. In conclusion, Further research is needed to optimize haemodynamic management of septic shock, particularly in developing novel vasopressor usage and fluid management approaches.

Keywords: Haemodynamic; Management; Sepsis; Shock.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Y.K. has received consultancy fees from Viatris. T.F., none. A.A.U., none. N.R., none.

References

    1. Evans L, Rhodes A, Alhazzani W, Antonelli M, Coopersmith CM, French C. et al. Surviving sepsis campaign: international guidelines for management of sepsis and septic shock 2021. Intensive Care Med. 2021;47:1181–247. 10.1007/s00134-021-06506-y. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Gordon AC, Alipanah-Lechner N, Bos LD, Dianti J, Diaz JV, Finfer S. et al. From ICU syndromes to ICU subphenotypes: consensus report and recommendations for developing precision medicine in the ICU. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2024;210:155–66. 10.1164/rccm.202311-2086SO. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Brown SM, Lanspa MJ, Jones JP, Kuttler KG, Li Y, Carlson R. et al. Survival after shock requiring high-dose vasopressor therapy. Chest. 2013;143:664–71. 10.1378/chest.12-1106. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Annane D, Vignon P, Renault A, Bollaert P-E, Charpentier C, Martin C. et al. Norepinephrine plus dobutamine versus epinephrine alone for management of septic shock: a randomised trial. Lancet. 2007;370:676–84. 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61344-0. - DOI - PubMed
    1. De Backer D, Biston P, Devriendt J, Madl C, Chochrad D, Aldecoa C. et al. Comparison of dopamine and norepinephrine in the treatment of shock. N Engl J Med. 2010;362:779–89. 10.1056/NEJMoa0907118. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources