Functional soft palate reconstruction
- PMID: 39816969
- PMCID: PMC11732850
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jpra.2024.11.016
Functional soft palate reconstruction
Abstract
Background: The excision of oropharyngeal carcinoma of more than 50% of the soft palate followed by static reconstruction may result in functional deficits, including velopharyngeal insufficiency, swallowing, and speech difficulties. We describe a functional soft palate reconstruction technique aimed at restoring aeromechanical and acoustic functions, enabling swallowing without nasal regurgitation and speech with low nasalance.
Material and methods: We developed a new operative technique, using muscle transfer and a free flap to create a dynamic reconstruction. To prove the distinct nerve innervation of the two digastric bellies and the feasibility of the technique, we first performed an anatomical study, and then implemented the technique in our clinic. The surgical technique included transfer of the anterior and posterior bellies of the digastric muscle in association with a folded radial forearm free flap. A retrospective analysis of patients who underwent this soft palate functional reconstruction after cancer resection between 2007 and 2017 was performed, and a subjective analysis of nasalance and swallowing was done to evaluate the functional outcomes.
Results: Eight patients (six males, two females) with a mean age of 56 years (range 43-69) who were affected by oropharynx carcinoma (stage T1-3) infiltrating the soft palate were included. Analysis of the reconstruction showed that seven of the eight patients had satisfactory swallowing function, and all patients were able to speak in an understandable manner with minimal nasalance.
Conclusions: Our surgical approach provided a functional reconstruction with outcomes close to normality, making it a suitable technique for patients with large soft palate defects.
Keywords: Digastric muscle; Functional reconstruction; Oropharyngeal carcinoma; Soft palate reconstruction.
© 2024 The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
None.
Figures
References
-
- Seikaly H, Rieger J, Wolfaardt J, et al. Functional outcomes after primary oropharyngeal cancer resection and reconstruction with the radial forearm free flap. Laryngoscope. 2003;113(5):897–904. - PubMed
-
- Brown JS, Zuydam AC, Jones DC, et al. Functional outcome in soft palate reconstruction using a radial forearm free flap in conjunction with a superiorly based pharyngeal flap. Head Neck. 1997;19(6):524–534. - PubMed
-
- Witt PD, O'Daniel TG, Marsh JL, et al. Surgical management of velopharyngeal dysfunction: outcome analysis of autogenous posterior pharyngeal wall augmentation. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1997;99(5):1287–1296. discussion 1297–1300. - PubMed
-
- Lesavoy MA, Borud LJ, Thorson T, et al. Upper airway obstruction after pharyngeal flap surgery. Ann Plast Surg. 1996;36(1):26–30. discussion 31–32. - PubMed
-
- Armour A, Fischbach S, Klaiman P, et al. Does velopharyngeal closure pattern affect the success of pharyngeal flap pharyngoplasty? Plast Reconstr Surg. 2005;115(1):45–52. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
