Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Mar;40(3):584-598.
doi: 10.1111/jgh.16882. Epub 2025 Jan 16.

Cost Effectiveness of Colorectal Cancer Screening Strategies in Middle- and High-Income Countries: A Systematic Review

Yuxuan Li  1 , Ruyi Xia  1 , Wenwen Si  1 , Wendi Zhang  1 , Yunbo Zhang  1 , Guihua Zhuang  1
Affiliations

Cost Effectiveness of Colorectal Cancer Screening Strategies in Middle- and High-Income Countries: A Systematic Review

Yuxuan Li et al. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2025 Mar.

Abstract

Background and aim: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a significant global health burden, and screening can greatly reduce CRC incidence and mortality. Previous studies investigated the economic effects of CRC screening. We performed a systematic review to provide the cost-effectiveness of CRC screening strategies across countries with different income levels.

Methods: We searched relevant scientific databases (PubMed, Embase, Ovid, Web of Science, Scopus) from January 1, 2010, to December 31, 2023. We selected English-language studies related to model-based economic evaluations of CRC screening strategies. Information such as the characters of screening tests, model characteristics, and key cost-effectiveness findings were collected. The net monetary benefit approach was used to compare the outcomes of various strategies.

Results: A total of 56 studies were identified, including 46 from high-income countries (HICs), 6 from upper-middle-income countries (UMICs), and 4 from lower-middle-income countries (LMICs). Most annual fecal occult blood tests and fecal immunochemical tests were cost-saving, and colonoscopy every 10 years was cost-saving. Other strategies involving multitarget fecal FIT-DNA detection, computed tomography colonography, and flexible sigmoidoscopy were cost-effective compared with no screening. Newer strategies such as magnetic resonance colonography every 5 years, annual urine metabolomic tests, and fecal bacterial biomarkers were cost-effective compared with no screening.

Conclusion: In our updated review, we found that common CRC screening strategies and magnetic resonance colonography continued to be cost-effective compared with no screening. Areas for further development include accurately modeling the natural history of colorectal cancer and obtaining more evidence from UMICs and LMICs.

Keywords: colorectal cancer; cost effectiveness; microsimulation; screening strategies.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. H. Sung, J. Ferlay, R. L. Siegel, et al., “Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries,” CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians 71, no. 3 (2021): 209–249.
    1. N. Li, B. Lu, C. Luo, et al., “Incidence, Mortality, Survival, Risk Factor and Screening of Colorectal Cancer: A Comparison Among China, Europe, and Northern America,” Cancer Letters 522 (2021): 255–268.
    1. Cancer IAfRo. Globocan 2020: Cancer Fact Sheets‐Colorectal Cancer. (2020).
    1. N. Keum and E. Giovannucci, “Global Burden of Colorectal Cancer: Emerging Trends, Risk Factors and Prevention Strategies,” Nature Reviews. Gastroenterology & Hepatology 16, no. 12 (2019): 713–732.
    1. P. Kanth and J. M. Inadomi, “Screening and Prevention of Colorectal Cancer,” BMJ 374 (2021): n1855.

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources