Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2025 Feb 11;104(3):e213334.
doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000213334. Epub 2025 Jan 16.

Long-Term Effect of Intensive vs Standard Blood Pressure Control on Mild Cognitive Impairment and Probable Dementia in SPRINT

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Long-Term Effect of Intensive vs Standard Blood Pressure Control on Mild Cognitive Impairment and Probable Dementia in SPRINT

David M Reboussin et al. Neurology. .

Erratum in

Abstract

Background and objectives: The Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial suggested that intensive lowering of systolic blood pressure (SBP) decreases the risk of developing dementia. However, an insufficient number of probable dementia cases stemming from the trial's early termination made results inconclusive. The goal of this study was to estimate the effect of intensive vs standard SBP lowering on the longer term incidence of cognitive impairment leveraging extended follow-up for cognitive status.

Methods: This is a prespecified secondary analysis of a randomized clinical trial. Between 2010 and 2013, patients aged 50 years and older with hypertension and increased cardiovascular risk excluding those with diabetes mellitus or history of stroke were recruited from 102 clinics in the United States and Puerto Rico. Participants were randomized to a SBP goal of <120 mm Hg (intensive treatment) or <140 mm Hg (standard treatment) and received treatment for 3.3 years. In-person cognitive assessment follow-up occurred through July 2018. Continued ascertainment of cognitive status by telephone began in December 2019 for participants who had not withdrawn consent or been previously adjudicated with probable dementia, but provided consent for future research. Data were analyzed using survival analyses.

Results: Of 9,361 randomized participants, 7,221 (77%) were eligible to be re-contacted. Cognitive status of 4,232 (59%) was ascertained (mean age 67 years, 36% female). We accrued a total of 216 new cases of probable dementia, less than our target of 326. Over a median follow-up of 7 years, 248 participants of the intensive treatment group (8.5 per 1,000 person-years) were adjudicated with probable dementia, compared with 293 participants (10.2 per 1,000 person-years) in the standard treatment group (hazard ratio [HR], 0.86; 95% CI, 0.72-1.02). Consistent with earlier results from the trial, the rate of both mild cognitive impairment (MCI; HR, 0.87 95% CI, 0.76-1.00) and a composite of MCI or probable dementia was lower with intensive treatment (HR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.79, 0.99).

Discussion: Among ambulatory adults with hypertension and high cardiovascular risk, intensive treatment vs standard treatment of SBP for 3.3 years resulted in a lower risk of MCI and cognitive impairment including MCI or probable dementia, but not for probable dementia alone.

Classification of evidence: This study provides Class II evidence that intensively reducing SBP (target <120 mm Hg) decreases the risk of cognitive impairment in individuals aged 50 years and older with hypertension.

Clinical trial information: Clinical trial number NCT01206062.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors report no relevant disclosures. Go to Neurology.org/N for full disclosures.

References

    1. Association as 2023 Alzheimer's disease facts and figures. Alzheimers Dement. 2023;19(4):1598-1695. - PubMed
    1. Petersen RC, Lopez O, Armstrong MJ, et al. Practice guideline update summary: mild cognitive impairment: report of the guideline development, dissemination, and implementation subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology. Neurology. 2018;90(3):126-135. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000004826 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Muntner P, Hardy ST, Fine LJ, et al. Trends in blood pressure control among US adults with hypertension, 1999-2000 to 2017-2018. JAMA. 2020;324(12):1190-1200. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.14545 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Malone JE, Elkasaby MI, Lerner AJ. Effects of hypertension on Alzheimer's disease and related disorders. Curr Hypertens Rep. 2022;24(12):615-625. doi: 10.1007/s11906-022-01221-5 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Palta P, Albert MS, Gottesman RF. Heart health meets cognitive health: evidence on the role of blood pressure. Lancet Neurol. 2021;20(10):854-867. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(21)00248-9 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

Substances

Associated data