Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2025 Apr;25(4):441-449.
doi: 10.1080/14737167.2025.2451749. Epub 2025 Jan 17.

A perspective on the use of patient-reported experience and patient-reported outcome measures in ambulatory healthcare

Affiliations
Review

A perspective on the use of patient-reported experience and patient-reported outcome measures in ambulatory healthcare

Ron D Hays et al. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2025 Apr.

Abstract

Introduction: Patient-reported experience measures (PREMs) are patient reports about their healthcare, whereas patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are reports about their functioning and well-being regarding physical, mental, and social health. We provide a perspective on using PREMs and PROMs in ambulatory healthcare.

Areas covered: We conducted a narrative review of the literature about using PREMs and PROMs in research and clinical practice, identified challenges and possibilities for addressing them, and provided suggestions for future research and clinical practice.

Expert opinion: Substantial progress in using PREMs and PROMs has occurred during the last half-century. Collecting and reporting PREMs to clinicians in ambulatory care settings has improved communication with patients, diagnosis, and treatment, which may improve patients' health. Optimal use requires appropriate data analysis, minimizing implementation barriers, and facilitating interpretation of PREMs and PROMs in clinical practice. Also, formal structures and processes that include patient and family input into care improvement are needed (e.g. patient and family advisory councils as partners in co-design and coproduction of quality improvement). PREMs and PROMs have been used primarily in more affluent countries (e.g. the United States, Australia, United Kingdom, Netherlands, Japan, and Portugal), but this is expected to increase in many countries.

Keywords: Ambulatory healthcare; clinical practice; patient-reported experience; patient-reported outcome; self-reported health; survey.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Disclosure statement: The authors report there are no competing interests to declare.

Similar articles

References

    1. National Academy of Medicine. Crossing the quality chasm: a new health system for the 21st century. Washington (D.C): National Academy Press; 2001. - PubMed
    1. Bull C, Byrnes J, Hettiarachchi R, et al. A systematic review of the validity and reliability of patient‐reported experience measures. Health Serv Res. 2019;54(5):1023–1035. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13187. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bull C, Teede H, Watson D, Callander EJ. Selecting and implementing patient-reported outcome and experience measures to assess health system performance. JAMA Health Forum. 2022;3(4):e220326. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2022.0326. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kingsley C, Patel S. Patient-reported outcome measures and patient-reported experience measures. BJA Education. 2017;17(4):137–144,. doi: 10.1093/bjaed/mkw060 - DOI
    1. Black N, Jenkinson C. Measuring patients’ experiences and outcomes. BMJ. 2009; 339:b2495. doi: 10.1136/bmj.b2495. - DOI - PubMed

MeSH terms