A perspective on the use of patient-reported experience and patient-reported outcome measures in ambulatory healthcare
- PMID: 39819211
- PMCID: PMC12182636
- DOI: 10.1080/14737167.2025.2451749
A perspective on the use of patient-reported experience and patient-reported outcome measures in ambulatory healthcare
Abstract
Introduction: Patient-reported experience measures (PREMs) are patient reports about their healthcare, whereas patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are reports about their functioning and well-being regarding physical, mental, and social health. We provide a perspective on using PREMs and PROMs in ambulatory healthcare.
Areas covered: We conducted a narrative review of the literature about using PREMs and PROMs in research and clinical practice, identified challenges and possibilities for addressing them, and provided suggestions for future research and clinical practice.
Expert opinion: Substantial progress in using PREMs and PROMs has occurred during the last half-century. Collecting and reporting PREMs to clinicians in ambulatory care settings has improved communication with patients, diagnosis, and treatment, which may improve patients' health. Optimal use requires appropriate data analysis, minimizing implementation barriers, and facilitating interpretation of PREMs and PROMs in clinical practice. Also, formal structures and processes that include patient and family input into care improvement are needed (e.g. patient and family advisory councils as partners in co-design and coproduction of quality improvement). PREMs and PROMs have been used primarily in more affluent countries (e.g. the United States, Australia, United Kingdom, Netherlands, Japan, and Portugal), but this is expected to increase in many countries.
Keywords: Ambulatory healthcare; clinical practice; patient-reported experience; patient-reported outcome; self-reported health; survey.
Conflict of interest statement
Similar articles
-
Use of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures and Patient-Reported Experience Measures Within Evaluation Studies of Telemedicine Applications: Systematic Review.J Med Internet Res. 2021 Nov 17;23(11):e30042. doi: 10.2196/30042. J Med Internet Res. 2021. PMID: 34523604 Free PMC article.
-
Patient-mediated interventions to improve professional practice.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Sep 11;9(9):CD012472. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012472.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018. PMID: 30204235 Free PMC article.
-
Interventions for interpersonal communication about end of life care between health practitioners and affected people.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Jul 8;7(7):CD013116. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013116.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022. PMID: 35802350 Free PMC article.
-
The use of Open Dialogue in Trauma Informed Care services for mental health consumers and their family networks: A scoping review.J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2024 Aug;31(4):681-698. doi: 10.1111/jpm.13023. Epub 2024 Jan 17. J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2024. PMID: 38230967
-
Patient-reported outcome measures for assessing health-related quality of life in people with type 2 diabetes: A systematic review.Rev Endocr Metab Disord. 2022 Oct;23(5):931-977. doi: 10.1007/s11154-022-09734-9. Epub 2022 Jul 2. Rev Endocr Metab Disord. 2022. PMID: 35779199 Free PMC article.
References
-
- National Academy of Medicine. Crossing the quality chasm: a new health system for the 21st century. Washington (D.C): National Academy Press; 2001. - PubMed
-
- Kingsley C, Patel S. Patient-reported outcome measures and patient-reported experience measures. BJA Education. 2017;17(4):137–144,. doi: 10.1093/bjaed/mkw060 - DOI
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical