Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Jan 15;15(1):e089756.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-089756.

Short- and long-term effects of transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation on autonomic cardiovascular control and arm-crank exercise capacity in individuals with a spinal cord injury (STIMEX-SCI): study protocol

Affiliations

Short- and long-term effects of transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation on autonomic cardiovascular control and arm-crank exercise capacity in individuals with a spinal cord injury (STIMEX-SCI): study protocol

Daniel D Hodgkiss et al. BMJ Open. .

Abstract

Introduction: Individuals with higher neurological levels of spinal cord injury (SCI) at or above the sixth thoracic segment (≥T6), exhibit impaired resting cardiovascular control and responses during upper-body exercise. Over time, impaired cardiovascular control predisposes individuals to lower cardiorespiratory fitness and thus a greater risk for cardiovascular disease and mortality. Non-invasive transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation (TSCS) has been shown to modulate cardiovascular responses at rest in individuals with SCI, yet its effectiveness to enhance exercise performance acutely, or promote superior physiological adaptations to exercise following an intervention, in an adequately powered cohort is unknown. Therefore, this study aims to explore the efficacy of acute TSCS for restoring autonomic function at rest and during arm-crank exercise to exhaustion (AIM 1) and investigate its longer-term impact on cardiorespiratory fitness and its concomitant benefits on cardiometabolic health and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) outcomes following an 8-week exercise intervention (AIM 2).

Methods and analysis: Sixteen individuals aged ≥16 years with a chronic, motor-complete SCI between the fifth cervical and sixth thoracic segments will undergo a baseline TSCS mapping session followed by an autonomic nervous system (ANS) stress test battery, with and without cardiovascular-optimised TSCS (CV-TSCS). Participants will then perform acute, single-session arm-crank exercise (ACE) trials to exhaustion with CV-TSCS or sham TSCS (SHAM-TSCS) in a randomised order. Twelve healthy, age- and sex-matched non-injured control participants will be recruited and will undergo the same ANS tests and exercise trials but without TSCS. Thereafter, the SCI cohort will be randomly assigned to an experimental (CV-TSCS+ACE) or control (SHAM-TSCS+ACE) group. All participants will perform 48 min of ACE twice per week (at workloads corresponding to 73-79% peak oxygen uptake), over a period of 8 weeks, either with (CV-TSCS) or without (SHAM-TSCS) cardiovascular-optimised stimulation. The primary outcomes are time to exhaustion (AIM 1) and cardiorespiratory fitness (AIM 2). Secondary outcomes for AIM 1 include arterial blood pressure, respiratory function, cerebral blood velocity, skeletal muscle tissue oxygenation, along with concentrations of catecholamines, brain-derived neurotrophic factor and immune cell dynamics via venous blood sampling pre, post and 90 min post-exercise. Secondary outcomes for AIM 2 include cardiometabolic health biomarkers, cardiac function, arterial stiffness, 24-hour blood pressure lability, energy expenditure, respiratory function, neural drive to respiratory muscles, seated balance and HRQoL (eg, bowel, bladder and sexual function). Outcome measures will be assessed at baseline, pre-intervention, post-intervention and after a 6-week follow-up period (HRQoL questionnaires only).

Ethics and dissemination: Ethical approval has been obtained from the Wales Research Ethics Committee 7 (23/WA/0284; 03/11/2024). The recruitment process began in February 2024, with the first enrolment in July 2024. Recruitment is expected to be completed by January 2026. The results will be presented at international SCI and sport-medicine conferences and will be submitted for publication in peer-reviewed journals.

Trial registration number: ISRCTN17856698.

Keywords: CARDIOLOGY; Neurological injury; Physical Therapy Modalities; REHABILITATION MEDICINE; SPORTS MEDICINE; Spine.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Trial flow chart. *NIC receive no stimulation. ACE, arm-crank exercise; ANS, autonomic nervous system, CV-TSCS, cardiovascular optimised transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation; NIC, non-injured controls; SCI, spinal cord injury; SHAM-TSCS, sham TSCS; TSCS, transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Standard Protocol Items: Recommendations for Interventional Trials schedule of enrolment, intervention and assessments. $Participants will perform these assessments in the days before this visit. *Participants will perform a CPET and SUT during the fourth week of the exercise intervention (Visit 8), no other autonomic nervous system stress tests will be conducted. ACE, arm-crank exercise; BDNF, brain-derived neurotrophic factor; BP, blood pressure; BPV, blood pressure variability; CPET, cardiopulmonary exercise test; CPT, cold pressor test; CV-TSCS, cardiovascular-optimised transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation; famil, familiarisation; HRDB, heart rate response to deep breathing; HRV, heart rate variability; NGF, nerve growth factor; NIC, non-injured controls; NVC, neurovascular coupling; NIRS, near-infrared spectroscopy (muscle tissue oxygenation); SCI, spinal cord injury; SF-36, Short-Form-36; SHAM-TSCS, sham transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation; SUT, sit-up test; RPE, rating of perceived exertion; TCD, transcranial Doppler; TMS, transcranial magnetic stimulation; TSCS, transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation; VM, Valsalva manoeuvre.

Similar articles

References

    1. Hou S, Rabchevsky AG. Autonomic consequences of spinal cord injury. Compr Physiol. 2014;4:1419–53. doi: 10.1002/cphy.c130045. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Anderson KD. Targeting recovery: priorities of the spinal cord-injured population. J Neurotrauma. 2004;21:1371–83. doi: 10.1089/neu.2004.21.1371. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Nightingale TE, Williams S, Thompson D, et al. Energy balance components in persons with paraplegia: daily variation and appropriate measurement duration. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2017;14:132. doi: 10.1186/s12966-017-0590-z. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. van den Berg-Emons RJ, Bussmann JB, Stam HJ. Accelerometry-based activity spectrum in persons with chronic physical conditions. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2010;91:1856–61. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2010.08.018. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Soriano JE, Squair JW, Cragg JJ, et al. A national survey of physical activity after spinal cord injury. Sci Rep. 2022;12:4405. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-07927-5. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types