Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2025 Jan 15;15(1):e086263.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-086263.

Association of preoperative blood biomarkers with postoperative major adverse cardiac events and mortality in major orthopaedic surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Association of preoperative blood biomarkers with postoperative major adverse cardiac events and mortality in major orthopaedic surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Yi Ren et al. BMJ Open. .

Abstract

Objective: The association between preoperative blood biomarkers and major adverse cardiac events (MACEs) as well as mortality after major orthopaedic surgery remains unclear. This study aimed to assess the association between preoperative blood biomarkers and postoperative MACEs as well as all-cause mortality in patients undergoing major orthopaedic surgery.

Design: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Data sources: PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews from inception to 20 October 2024 were searched.

Eligibility criteria: Observational or experimental studies reporting the correlation between preoperative blood biomarkers and postoperative MACEs-categorised as short-term (within 3 months) or long-term (beyond 3 months)-and all-cause mortality in patients undergoing major orthopaedic surgery.

Data extraction and synthesis: Data from studies reporting OR or HR and its 95% CI were pooled for analysis using random-effects model.

Results: 21 preoperative blood-based biomarkers from 80 studies with 226 468 patients were analysed. Elevated preoperative cardiac biomarkers were correlated with a heightened risk of MACEs within 3 months (natriuretic peptide: OR 3.37, 95% CI 2.07 to 5.47, I2=87.9%; cardiac troponin: OR 4.89, 95% CI 1.52 to 15.75, I2=69.5%) with significant heterogeneity. Only natriuretic peptide was associated with a high-risk long-term MACEs (>3 months) (OR 3.52, 95% CI 1.73 to 7.17, I2=86.2%). In contrast, cardiac biomarkers were not identified as having prognostic value for all-cause mortality in this patient cohort. Additionally, an increased risk of all-cause mortality was associated with preoperative abnormal levels of albumin (OR 1.15, 95% CI 1.06 to 1.24, I2=84.8%), creatinine (OR 1.54, 95% CI 1.12 to 1.95, I2=0), 25(OH)D (OR 1.58, 95% CI 1.01 to 2.14, I2=0) and glomerular filtration rate (GFR) (OR 1.12, 95% CI 1.06 to 1.17, I2=0), rather than cardiac biomarkers.

Conclusions: The study proposed that cardiac biomarkers assessed before surgery could offer prognostic insight into short-term MACEs, while preoperative abnormal levels of albumin, creatinine, 25 (OH)D and GFR might be prognostic valuable for all-cause mortality following major orthopaedic surgery.

Prospero registration number: CRD42022352091.

Keywords: Anaesthesia in orthopaedics; Meta-Analysis; Mortality.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses flow diagram.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Risk of bias graph: review authors’ judgement about each risk of bias item presented as percentages across all included studies.
Figure 3
Figure 3. Risk of major adverse cardiac event for patients with elevated preoperative BNP or NT-proBNP versus those with normal levels. BNP, B-type natriuretic peptide; NT-proBNP, N-terminal pro-BNP.
Figure 4
Figure 4. Risk of major adverse cardiac event for patients with elevated preoperative cardiac troponin versus those with normal levels during short-term follow-up.

Similar articles

References

    1. Beckerly R, Avram MJ. Clinical Anesthesia Procedures of the Massachusetts General Hospital, Eighth Edition. Anesthesiology. 2011;115:663. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e31821f8eb0. - DOI
    1. Swann MC, Hoes KS, Aoun SG, et al. Postoperative complications of spine surgery. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol. 2016;30:103–20. doi: 10.1016/j.bpa.2016.01.002. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Borges FK, Bhandari M, Guerra-Farfan E, et al. Accelerated surgery versus standard care in hip fracture (HIP ATTACK): an international, randomised, controlled trial. The Lancet. 2020;395:698–708. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30058-1. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Le Manach Y, Collins G, Bhandari M, et al. Outcomes After Hip Fracture Surgery Compared With Elective Total Hip Replacement. JAMA. 2015;314:1159–66. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.10842. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Horvath B, Kloesel B, Todd MM, et al. The Evolution, Current Value, and Future of the American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status Classification System. Anesthesiology. 2021;135:904–19. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000003947. - DOI - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources