Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Jan 16;20(1):e0315625.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0315625. eCollection 2025.

Integrating post-validation surveillance of lymphatic filariasis with the WHO STEPwise approach to non-communicable disease risk factor surveillance in Niue, a study protocol

Affiliations

Integrating post-validation surveillance of lymphatic filariasis with the WHO STEPwise approach to non-communicable disease risk factor surveillance in Niue, a study protocol

Adam T Craig et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Background: Lymphatic filariasis (LF), a mosquito-borne parasitic disease caused by three species of filarial worms, was first detected in Niue, a small Pacific Island nation of approximately 1,600 people, in 1954. After extensive efforts involving multiple rounds of Mass Drug Administration, Niue was validated by the World Health Organization (WHO) as having e4liminated LF as a public health problem in 2016. However, no surveillance has been conducted since validation to confirm infection rates have remained below WHO's elimination threshold. WHO has encouraged an integrated approach to disease surveillance and integrating LF post-validation surveillance (PVS) with existing surveys is an anticipated recommendation of the upcoming WHO LF-PVS guidelines. This paper describes a protocol for the implementation of an integrated approach to LF-PVS in Niue as cost-efficient and operationally feasible means of monitoring the disease in the population.

Methods: The LF-PVS will be implemented as part of a planned national population-based WHO STEPwise approach to non-communicable disease (NCD) risk factor surveillance (STEPS) in Niue. Integration between the LF-PVS and STEPS will occur at multiple points, including during pre-survey community awareness raising and engagement, when obtaining informed consent, during the collection of demographics, risk factor, and location data, and when collecting finger-prick blood samples (for glucose as part of the STEPS survey and LF as part of the LF-PVS). The primary outcome measure for LF transmission will be antigen positivity. Microfilaria slides will be prepared for any antigen-positive cases. Dried blood spots will be prepared for all participants for Multiplex Bead Assays-based analysis to detect anti-filarial antibodies. We estimate a total sample size of 1,062 participants aged 15-69, representing approximately 66% of the population.

Conclusions: The results of this study will provide insight into the status of LF in Niue and evaluate the advantages, challenges, and opportunities offered by integrated approaches to disease surveillance.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Map of Niue showing administrative regions, the capital (Alofi) and Niue’s location in the Pacific Ocean (insert).
Fig 2
Fig 2. Timeline of lymphatic filariasis surveillance results and mass drug administration in Niue, 1954 to 2016.
Fig 3
Fig 3. Points at which post-validation surveillance for lymphatic filariasis will be integrated with the WHO STEPwise approach to NCD risk factor surveillance in Niue.
[Note that activities in yellow represent components of the STEPS survey; activities in the pink box represent activities undertaken in the field as part of data collection; and activities in blue indicate points where post-validation surveillance for lymphatic filariasis will be integrated with the STEPS survey’s workflow].
Fig 4
Fig 4
(a) Finger prick capillary puncture; (b) The collection of 300 μL of blood into a heparin-coated tube; (c) Filariasis test strip; (d) Dried-blood spots; (e) Microfilariae slides.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Riches N, Badia-Rius X, Mzilahowa T, Kelly-Hope LA. A systematic review of alternative surveillance approaches for lymphatic filariasis in low prevalence settings: Implications for post-validation settings. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2020;14(5):e0008289. Epub 2020/05/13. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0008289 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC7217451. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sasa M. Human filariasis. A global survey of epidemiology and control: University Park Press.; 1976.
    1. World Health Organization. The PacELF way: towards the elimination of lymphatic filariasis from the Pacific, 1999–2005. 2006.
    1. Russell TL, Burkot TR. A guide to mosquitoes in the Pacific. Noumea, New Caledonia: Pacific Community (SPC); 2023.
    1. Lammie PJ, Cuenco KT, Punkosdy GA. The pathogenesis of filarial lymphedema: is it the worm or is it the host? Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. 2002;979(1):131–42. - PubMed

MeSH terms

Substances

LinkOut - more resources