Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Mar 3;157(2):e202413669.
doi: 10.1085/jgp.202413669. Epub 2025 Jan 17.

The differential impacts of equivalent gating-charge mutations in voltage-gated sodium channels

Affiliations

The differential impacts of equivalent gating-charge mutations in voltage-gated sodium channels

Eslam Elhanafy et al. J Gen Physiol. .

Abstract

Voltage-gated sodium (Nav) channels are pivotal for cellular signaling, and mutations in Nav channels can lead to excitability disorders in cardiac, muscular, and neural tissues. A major cluster of pathological mutations localizes in the voltage-sensing domains (VSDs), resulting in either gain-of-function, loss-of-function effects, or both. However, the mechanism behind this functional diversity of mutations at equivalent positions remains elusive. Through hotspot analysis, we identified three gating charges (R1, R2, and R3) as major mutational hotspots in VSDs. The same amino acid substitutions at equivalent gating-charge positions in VSDI and VSDII of the cardiac sodium channel Nav1.5 show differential gating property impacts in electrophysiology measurements. We conducted molecular dynamics (MD) simulations on wild-type channels and six mutants to elucidate the structural basis of their differential impacts. Our 120-µs MD simulations with applied external electric fields captured VSD state transitions and revealed the differential structural dynamics between equivalent R-to-Q mutants. Notably, we observed transient leaky conformations in some mutants during structural transitions, offering a detailed structural explanation for gating-pore currents. Our salt-bridge network analysis uncovered VSD-specific and state-dependent interactions among gating charges, countercharges, and lipids. This detailed analysis revealed how mutations disrupt critical electrostatic interactions, thereby altering VSD permeability and modulating gating properties. By demonstrating the crucial importance of considering the specific structural context of each mutation, our study advances our understanding of structure-function relationships in Nav channels. Our work establishes a robust framework for future investigations into the molecular basis of ion channel-related disorders.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Disclosures: The authors declare no competing interests exist.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Stepwise deactivation of VSDs of Na v channels. Cartoon depiction of the sequential deactivation of the Nav1.5 VSD in response to membrane potential changes. The S4 helix (blue) moves relative to static S1–S3 (gray), with negatively (−) charged countercharged residues (red) and the HCS residue (green). The S4 positively (+) charged gating-charge residues adopt an up conformation under depolarized potential and transition to a down conformation as the potential recovers, illustrating the VSD’s dynamic nature. The countercharges above the HCS from helices (S1–S3) are situated in an extracellular negatively charged cluster (ENC) and are referred to as S1E, S2E, and S3E. Similarly, those closer to the cytoplasmic region occupy the intracellular negatively charged cluster (INC) and are referred to as S1I, S2I, and S3I.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
MSA of VSDs from four repeats of nine isoforms in the human Na v channel family, highlighting countercharge residues (red), HCS (green), and gating-charge residues (blue).
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Mapping the mutation hotspots in VSDs of Na v channels. The annotated disease-associated mutations from UniProt are mapped along the MSA of VSDs in nine human Nav channels. (A–C) The number of mutations at the equivalent position in four VSDs (A), the number of phenotypes in VSDI (B), and that in VSDII (C) are used to demonstrate the mutation hotspots. (B and C) Pathogenic missense mutations are colored according to GoF (green bars), LoF (red), mixed (yellow), and uncertain (black) effects. Hotspots are labeled in this figure with either the order of gating charges (A) or residue IDs from Nav1.5 (B and C).
Figure S1.
Figure S1.
Z position of gating charges relative to the HCS under varying TM potentials (−150 and −500 mV). At −150 mV (top), no structural transition in the position of the gating charges is observed staying in the up state after 5 µs. Applying −500 mV (bottom) results in further structural transitions, with the gating charges reaching the down state, indicating that higher potentials promote more extensive conformational changes.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
State transitions of VSD in a µs-scale MD simulation. The dynamic behavior of VSDII under an external electric field of 500 mV in opposite directions. Traces of z positions for Cα atoms of the gating-charge residues (R1-K5) in different colors in VSDII relative to the HCS are shown to track the structural changes. Molecular images of representative VSDII snapshots (0, 3, 6, 9, and 13 µs) are presented in a white ribbon representation, with licorice representations of gating charges (blue), countercharges (red), and the HCS (green). The direction and magnitude of the external electric field applied are depicted by arrows (blue and green).
Figure S2.
Figure S2.
Representative simulation system for VSD II . The molecular visualization features the VSDII domain in a cartoon representation, with VSD domain in lime and PD in purple. Gating charges are highlighted in licorice representation (blue) and the HCS is emphasized in green. Water molecules are shown as a white surface, while the membrane lipids are depicted using a van der Waals (VDW) representation in silver.
Figure 5.
Figure 5.
Differential impacts of R-to-Q mutations in VSD I and VSD II during up-to-down transitions. (A and B) The differential dynamic behaviors of R-to-Q mutations (R1, R2, and R3) in VSDI (A) and VSDII (B) in comparison to the WT under an external electric field of −500 mV. Traces of z positions for Cα atoms of the gating-charge residues in S4 relative to that of the HCS are shown in each panel to track the structural changes. Molecular images of VSDs are presented in a white cartoon representation, illustrating the initial and final frames with licorice representations of gating charges (blue), countercharges (red), and the HCS (green). Only one representative trajectory among three independent runs for each mutant is illustrated here.
Figure 6.
Figure 6.
Comparative analysis of MD up-to-down transition rates for WT and R-to-Q mutations in VSD I and VSD II . (A) Dynamic behaviors of VSDI transitions, showing WT (black), R219Q (blue), R222Q (green), and R225Q (red). (B) Dynamic behaviors of VSDII transitions, showing WT (black), R808Q (blue), R811Q (green), and R814Q (red). Data points represent results from three independent simulation runs, depicted by filled circles, empty squares, and filled squares. All simulations begin in the up state (light blue) under an applied external electric field of −500 mV, with transitions observed toward the intermediate state (orange) and down state (gray).
Figure S3.
Figure S3.
Functional measurements for mutations in VDS I and VSD II R2 to glutamine. (A) Representative currents for each channel in response to a series of 100-ms voltage pulses from −90 to 70 mV in 10 mV increments. (B) Conductance versus voltage plots comparing WT (n = 9) to R222Q (n = 5) and R811Q (n = 6). (C) Steady-state channel availability curves comparing WT (n = 8) to R222Q (n = 7) and R811Q (n = 7). (D) Plots showing the recovery time from inactivation again comparing WT (n = 7) to R222Q (n = 7) and R811Q (n = 8). Fits were performed as described in the Materials and methods and the Results are shown in Table S2 along with the determination of significance using a one-way ANOVA with a post hoc Dunnett’s test.
Figure 7.
Figure 7.
Pore opening of mutants in VSD I and VSD II during MD simulations. (A and B) Each panel depicts the time series of the minimum radius of the aqueous pathway of gating pore through VSDs during simulations. A 1.5-Å–dashed line represents the potential pore opening threshold for water and ion permeation through VSDs. WT traces are presented in black, R1 mutants (R219Q and R808Q) in blue, R2 mutants (R222Q and R811Q) in green, and R3 mutants (R225Q and R814Q) in red. (C and D) Each panel shows molecular images of VSDI (C) and VSDII (D) WT and mutants (S3 removed for clarity). In each snapshot, gating charges (blue), countercharges (red), HCS (green) residues are illustrated in licorice representation. Sodium (yellow) and chloride (gray) ions are depicted in spheres. Snapshots are selected at the time points indicated by black arrows in A and B. The water molecules are illustrated as a transparent red surface. The black-dashed circles indicate the non-accessible solvent region, separating the extracellular and intracellular water milieu.
Figure S4.
Figure S4.
The time series of VSD structural transition, gating pore opening, and ion permeation. (A and B) This figure presents a comprehensive study of WT and mutants (R1, R2, and R3) in VSDI (A) and VSDII (B). Each panel shows the z positions of gating-charge residues relative to HCS (top), the minimum pore radius of VSDs (middle), and ion permeations (bottom) with the function of time.
Figure 8.
Figure 8.
State-dependent salt-bridge network analysis for R-to-Q mutants in VSD I and VSD II . (A and B) Comprehensive analysis for WT and mutants (R1, R2, and R3) in VSDI (A) and VSDII (B). Each panel depicts the map of electrostatic interactions at various states (up, intermediate, and down) within each VSD. Nodes represent residues of gating charges (blue), mutated residues (orange), countercharges (red), HCS (green), and lipids (black). Edges represent the salt bridges, with numbers indicating the occupancy percentage of the interaction during each state. Countercharges are labeled with residue IDs from Nav1.5.

Update of

References

    1. Ahangar, A.A., Elhanafy E., Blanton H., and Li J.. 2024. Mapping structural distribution and gating-property impacts of disease-associated mutations in voltage-gated sodium channels. iScience. 27:110678. 10.1016/j.isci.2024.110678 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ahern, C.A., Payandeh J., Bosmans F., and Chanda B.. 2016. The hitchhiker’s guide to the voltage-gated sodium channel galaxy. J. Gen. Physiol. 147:1–24. 10.1085/jgp.201511492 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ahuja, S., Mukund S., Deng L., Khakh K., Chang E., Ho H., Shriver S., Young C., Lin S., Johnson J.P. Jr., et al. 2015. Structural basis of Nav1.7 inhibition by an isoform-selective small-molecule antagonist. Science. 350:aac5464. 10.1126/science.aac5464 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Beckermann, T.M., McLeod K., Murday V., Potet F., and George A.L. Jr.. 2014. Novel SCN5A mutation in amiodarone-responsive multifocal ventricular ectopy-associated cardiomyopathy. Heart Rhythm. 11:1446–1453. 10.1016/j.hrthm.2014.04.042 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bendahhou, S., Cummins T.R., and Agnew W.S.. 1997. Mechanism of modulation of the voltage-gated skeletal and cardiac muscle sodium channels by fatty acids. Am. J. Physiol. 272:C592–C600. 10.1152/ajpcell.1997.272.2.C592 - DOI - PubMed

MeSH terms

Substances

LinkOut - more resources