Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Jan 16;9(1):e70070.
doi: 10.1002/hem3.70070. eCollection 2025 Jan.

Idecabtagene vicleucel or ciltacabtagene autoleucel for relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma: An international multicenter study

Affiliations

Idecabtagene vicleucel or ciltacabtagene autoleucel for relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma: An international multicenter study

Maximilian Merz et al. Hemasphere. .

Abstract

Idecabtagene vicleucel (ide-cel) and ciltacabtagene autoleucel (cilta-cel) have revolutionized the treatment of relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM), but direct comparisons are lacking. Leveraging an international multicenter RRMM cohort, we compared the outcome of ide-cel (n = 162) versus cilta-cel (n = 42). Co-primary efficacy endpoints of the study were overall response rate (ORR) and progression-free survival (PFS). Co-primary safety endpoints were the incidence of cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and immune-effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS). Median turnaround time between apheresis and infusion was 47 days for ide-cel versus 68 days for cilta-cel (p < 0.001). Cilta-cel showed significantly higher ORR (93% vs. 79%; p < 0.001), with complete response at Day 30 of 48% versus 26% (p < 0.001). The 10-month PFS and overall survival (OS) was 82% and 90% for cilta-cel versus 47% and 77% ide-cel (p < 0.001 and p = 0.06), and improved outcome for cilta-cel was confirmed after multivariable adjustment. Incidence of CRS and ICANS appeared similar (81% and 19% for cilta-cel versus 85% and 19% for ide-cel), while 10% and 7% in the cilta-cel group versus 4% and 2% in the ide-cel group showed severe CRS and ICANS grade 3-4, with CRS occurring significantly earlier for ide-cel (median, 2 days vs. 4 days; p < 0.001). Nonrelapse mortality was 5% for cilta-cel versus 3% for ide-cel (p = 0.51). Cilta-cel showed later peak of CAR-T expansion at Day 14 versus Day 7 for ide-cel, while cilta-cel expansion was associated with ICANS. Our study provides real-world evidence that cilta-cel was associated with superior outcomes and distinct cellular dynamics versus ide-cel in triple-class exposed RRMM.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Nico Gagelmann: Consulting or Advisory Role: Stemline Therapeutics, MorphoSys Travel, Accommodations, Expenses: Bristol Myers Squibb/Celgene, Janssen. Maximilian Merz: Honoraria: Janssen, BMS GmbH & Co KG, Amgen, AbbVie, Stemline Therapeutics, Takeda, Sanofi, Pfizer Consulting or Advisory Role: Janssen, BMS GmbH & Co KG, Pfizer, Sanofi Research Funding: Janssen, SpringWorks Therapeutics, Roche/Genentech Travel, Accommodations, Expenses: Janssen, Stemline Therapeutics, Pfizer. Aina Oliver‐Caldés: Travel, Accommodations, Expenses: Janssen. Friedrich Stölzel: Honoraria: Medac, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Consulting or Advisory Role: Glycostem, Travel, Accommodations, Expenses: SERVIER. Anca‐Maria Albici: Honoraria: AbbVie, Travel, Accommodations, Expenses: SERVIER. Natalie Schub: Honoraria: Janssen Oncology, Consulting or Advisory Role: BMS, Travel, Accommodations, Expenses: Kite/Gilead. Soraya Kharboutli: Honoraria: Bristol Myers Squibb GmbH, Travel, Accommodations, Expenses: Janssen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Sobi, Novartis. Fabian Müller: Honoraria: AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb/Pfizer, Kite/Gilead, Consulting or Advisory Role: Bristol Myers Squibb/Pfizer, Janssen, Kite/Gilead, Kite/Gilead, Novartis, Miltenyi Biomedicine, Research Funding: Kite/Gilead, Travel, Accommodations, Expenses: SOBI, Janssen. Vladan Vucinic: Honoraria: Janssen, BMS GmbH & Co KG, Gilead Sciences, Amgen, Consulting or Advisory Role: Gilead Sciences, Janssen, BMS GmbH & Co KG, Amgen, Travel, Accommodations, Expenses: Sobi, Janssen, Gilead Sciences, Amgen. Uwe Platzbecker: Honoraria: Celgene/Jazz, AbbVie, Curis, Geron, Janssen, Consulting or Advisory Role: Celgene/Jazz, Novartis, BMS GmbH & Co KG, Research Funding: Amgen (Inst), Janssen (Inst), Novartis (Inst), BerGenBio (Inst), Celgene (Inst), Curis (Inst), Patents, Royalties, Other Intellectual Property: Part of a patent for a TFR‐2 antibody (Rauner et al. Nature Metabolics 2019), Travel, Accommodations, Expenses: Celgene. Francis Ayuk: Honoraria: Bristol Myers Squibb/Celgene, Kite/Gilead, Janssen, Miltenyi Biomedicine, Novartis, Takeda, Mallinckrodt/Therakos, medac pharma, Consulting or Advisory Role: Bristol Myers Squibb/Celgene Research Funding: Mallinckrodt/Therakos. Nicolaus Kröger: Honoraria: Novartis, Celgene (Inst), Sanofi, Jazz Pharmaceuticals (Inst), Kite/Gilead, RIEMSER (Inst), AOP Orphan Pharmaceuticals, BMS GmbH & Co KG, Neovii, Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Takeda, Pierre Fabre Consulting or Advisory Role: Neovii, Sanofi, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Novartis, Celgene, RIEMSER, Gilead Sciences, Speakers' Bureau: AOP Orphan Pharmaceuticals, Research Funding: Neovii (Inst), Novartis (Inst), Celgene (Inst), Riemser (Inst), Travel, Accommodations, Expenses: Neovii, Novartis, Gilead Sciences, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Sanofi, Celgene. Carlos Fernández de Larrea: Honoraria: Janssen, BeiGene, Bristol Myers Squibb/Celgene, Pfizer, Amgen, GlaxoSmithKline Consulting or Advisory Role: Janssen, Bristol Myers Squibb/Celgene, Amgen, Pfizer, Sanofi, BeiGene Research Funding: Janssen (Inst), Bristol Myers Squibb/Celgene (Inst), Amgen (Inst), GlaxoSmithKline (Inst) Travel, Accommodations, Expenses: Janssen, Amgen, GlaxoSmithKline, Bristol Myers Squibb/Celgene, BeiGene, Pfizer. No other potential conflicts of interest were reported.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Efficacy of ide‐cel and cilta‐cel. (A) Response, CR, complete response; PR, partial response; VGPR, very good partial remission. (B) Progression‐free survival, PFS. (C) Overall survival, OS.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Nonrelapse mortality and causes of death. (A) Nonrelapse mortality, NRM. (B) Causes of death, HLH, hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Forest plot for progression‐free survival. BCMA, B‐cell maturation antigen; EMD, extramedullary disease; R‐ISS, Revised International Staging System.
Figure 4
Figure 4
CAR‐T dynamics between ide‐cel and cilta‐cel after infusion.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Association of CAR‐T expansion with efficacy (A) and safety (B) for ide‐cel and cilta‐cel. CRS, cytokines release syndrome; ICANS, immune‐effector cell‐associated neurotoxicity syndrome; PR, partial response.

References

    1. Rajkumar SV. Multiple myeloma: 2024 update on diagnosis, risk‐stratification, and management. Am J Hematol. 2024;99:1802‐1824. 10.1002/ajh.27422 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cowan AJ, Green DJ, Kwok M, et al. Diagnosis and management of multiple myeloma: a review. JAMA. 2022;327(5):464‐477. 10.1001/jama.2022.0003 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Munshi NC, Anderson LD Jr., Shah N, et al. Idecabtagene vicleucel in relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma. N Engl J Med. 2021;384(8):705‐716. 10.1056/NEJMoa2024850 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Berdeja JG, Madduri D, Usmani SZ, et al. Ciltacabtagene autoleucel, a B‐cell maturation antigen‐directed chimeric antigen receptor T‐cell therapy in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (CARTITUDE‐1): a phase 1b/2 open‐label study. Lancet. 2021;398(10297):314‐324. 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)00933-8 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hansen DK, Sidana S, Peres LC, et al. Idecabtagene vicleucel for relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma: real‐world experience from the myeloma CAR T consortium. J Clin Oncol. 2023;41(11):2087‐2097. 10.1200/JCO.22.01365 - DOI - PMC - PubMed