Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Nov;31(11):3152-3166.
doi: 10.1007/s10826-022-02285-2. Epub 2022 Mar 31.

How Do Victimized Youth Emotionally and Socially Appraise Common Ways Third-Party Peers Intervene?

Zoe Higheagle Strong  1 , Karin S Frey  2 , Emma M McMain  1 , Cynthia R Pearson  2 , Yawen Chiu  2
Affiliations

How Do Victimized Youth Emotionally and Socially Appraise Common Ways Third-Party Peers Intervene?

Zoe Higheagle Strong et al. J Child Fam Stud. 2022 Nov.

Abstract

Adolescents targeted for peer aggression are at risk of emotion dysregulation and social withdrawal-responses that predict increased victimization and impede the protective factors of peer support. This study examined victimized youth's emotions and social appraisals following four common third-party peer actions. African American, European American, Mexican American, and Native American adolescents (N = 257, 53% female, M age = 15 years) described their emotions and appraisals of third-party peer actions after the participants had been targets of peer aggression. As hypothesized, emotional well-being, indexed by low levels of internalizing emotions and high levels of positive emotions, was greater after third-parties tried to help participants calm their emotions and resolve problems than after third-parties amplified participants' anger or avenged the victimized participants. Emotional well-being was greater after third-party revenge than after third-parties amplified participants' anger. Participants also reported calming, resolving and to a lesser extent third-party revenge, were more helpful, valued, and evoked a greater desire to reciprocate than anger amplification. Few ethnic differences were found. We consider how positive emotions and social appraisals of third-party actions are likely to increase well-being for victimized youth. The findings emphasize the need for specificity in how researchers and practitioners categorize third-party peer actions. Encouraging the types of action that are most appreciated by victimized youth might help adolescents be more effective sources of support in the context of peer aggression.

Keywords: Emotion regulation; Ethnically diverse; Peer support; Peer victimization; Third-party actions.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Internalizing emotion response based on third-party actions
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Positive emotion response based on third-party actions
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Peer social appraisals based on third-party actions
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Alfieri S, Tagliabue S, Marta E, Aresi G, Lanz M, & Pozzi M (2018). Gratitude as a variable of mediation between parental support and self-esteem in adolescence. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 27(2), 1394–1401. 10.1007/s10826-017-1001-4. - DOI
    1. Arsenio WF, Gold J, & Adams E (2004). Adolescents’ emotion expectancies regarding aggressive and nonaggressive events: connections with behavior problems. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 89(4), 338–355. 10.1016/j.jecp.2004.08.00. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Arsenio WF, Gold J, & Adams E (2006). Children’s conceptions and displays of moral emotions. In Killen M & Smetana JG (Eds.), Handbook of Moral Development pp. 581–609. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    1. Arsenio WF, Adams E, & Gold J (2009). Social information processing, moral reasoning, and emotion attributions: Relations with adolescents’ reactive and proactive aggression. Child Development, 80(6), 1739–1755. 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2009.01365.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Barry CN, & Wentzel KR (2006). Friend influence on prosocial behavior: the role of motivational factors and friendship characteristics. Developmental Psychology, 42(1), 153–163. 10.1037/0012-1649.42.1.153. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources