Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2024 Sep 17;9(4):owae065.
doi: 10.1093/fsr/owae065. eCollection 2024 Dec.

Error mitigation in forensic handwriting examination: the examiner's perspective

Nicole Crown  1 , Raymond Marquis  2 , Erich Kupferschmid  1 , Tomasz Dziedzic  3 , Diana Belic  4 , Dorijan Kerzan  5
Affiliations
Review

Error mitigation in forensic handwriting examination: the examiner's perspective

Nicole Crown et al. Forensic Sci Res. .

Abstract

Like other pattern recognition disciplines, forensic handwriting examination relies on various human factors. Expert opinions in the field are based on visual analysis and comparison, and the evaluation of findings is generally conducted without reference to tabulated data. This high level of subjectivity may contribute to bias and error in the examination process. In this paper, we draw on our research and practical experience to discuss error mitigation on several levels, addressing both aspects of quality management and the individual responsibility of examiners. Because a good understanding of the concept of error is needed to communicate appropriately about this subject, definitions of error-related concepts are provided. We consider contextual information management essential to reduce the potential for cognitive bias in casework. To ensure completeness of findings and avoid omission errors, the use of checklists during a forensic handwriting examination is encouraged, and an exemplary checklist incorporating all the examination steps is provided. We consider the use of a logical reasoning approach to evaluate findings an important step towards robustness and transparency in the examiner's report. An independent, blinded peer review of the examination is recommended as a further key step in error mitigation. Regular participation in testing programmes and continuous training and education are essential to maintaining and improving competency at both individual and organizational levels. Finally, developments in the form of tabulated data and the use of algorithms are considered useful ways of increasing objectivity in the field and minimizing human error.

Keywords: Bayesian framework; checklists; context management; error mitigation; error notion; forensic sciences; handwriting and document examination; peer review; testing.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Yearly participation in testing procedures.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Consequences of incorrect results achieved in testing procedures.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. ENFSI . Best Practice Manual for the Forensic Handwriting Examination. ENFSI-BPM-FHX-01. Ed. 04. 2022.
    1. Vanderkolk J. ACE + V: a model. J Forensic Identif. 2004;54:45–52.
    1. Christensen AM, Crowder CM, Ousley SD, et al. Error and its meaning in forensic science. J Forensic Sci. 2014;59:123–126. - PubMed
    1. Expert Working Group for Human Factors in Handwriting Examination . Forensic Handwriting Examination and Human Factors: Improving the Practice through a Systems Approach. U.S. Department of Commerce, National Institute of Standards and Technology. NISTIR 8282R1. 2021.
    1. National Research Council . National Academy of Sciences (NAS). Strengthening Forensic Science in the United States: A Path Forward. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2009.

LinkOut - more resources