Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Dec;57(1):2451183.
doi: 10.1080/07853890.2025.2451183. Epub 2025 Jan 17.

Risk-based triage strategy by extended HPV genotyping for women with ASC-US cytology

Affiliations

Risk-based triage strategy by extended HPV genotyping for women with ASC-US cytology

Xuan Rao et al. Ann Med. 2025 Dec.

Abstract

Objective: We attempted to evaluate the immediate high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion-cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2/3 or worse (HSIL-CIN2+/3+, hereafter referred to as CIN2+/3+) risk of specific human papillomavirus (HPV) genotype and form the precise risk-based triage strategy for atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASC-US) women.

Methods: The clinical data of ASC-US women who underwent HPV genotyping testing and colposcopy were retrospectively reviewed. The distribution and CIN2+/3+ risks of specific HPV genotype were assessed by three approaches. The risk-based triage strategy was further established, and its efficacy in detecting CIN2+/3+ was estimated.

Results: Totally, 5553 ASC-US women including 3648 HPV-positive and 1905 HPV-negative were analysed. CIN2+/3+ were 662/319 cases, including 639/306 HPV-positive and 23/13 HPV-negative women. HPV16, HPV52, HPV58 and HPV18 were always among the top 5 ranking genotypes, no matter in HPV-positive women or in HPV-positive CIN2+/3+ cases. HPV16 and HPV33 carried the highest risk, while HPV73 and 26 carried the least risk for CIN2+/3+. Based on the immediate CIN2+/3+ risk of specific HPV genotype, 18 HPVs were divided into three risk-stratified groups. Only women infected with HPVs included in group A were necessary for immediate colposcopy. Compared with conventional strategy, this new risk-based strategy not only had higher specificity (CIN2+: p = .00; CIN3+: p = .01) and positive predictive value (CIN2+: p = .00; CIN3+: p = .03) for detecting CIN2+/3+, but also needed fewer colposcopies to identify each CIN2+/3+.

Conclusions: A new triage strategy for ASC-US women was successfully constructed based on CIN2+/3+ risks of 14 high-risk and 4 intermediate-risk HPVs, which could significantly reduce unnecessary colposcopies.

Keywords: Atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance; cervical intraepithelial neoplasia; colposcopy; extended genotyping; human papillomavirus; risk-based triage strategy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Distribution and the immediate risk of specific HPV genotype. (A) The distribution of specific HPV genotype in HPV-positive ASC-US women estimated by Min. (B) The distribution of specific HPV genotype in HPV-positive ASC-US women estimated by Any. (C) The distribution of specific HPV genotype in HPV-positive ASC-US women estimated by Hier. (D) The distribution of specific HPV genotype in HPV-positive CIN2+/3+ cases estimated by Min. (E) The distribution of specific HPV genotype in HPV-positive CIN2+/3+ cases estimated by Any. (F) The distribution of specific HPV genotype in HPV-positive CIN2+/3+ cases estimated by Hier. (G) The immediate CIN2+/3+ risk of specific HPV genotype in HPV-positive ASC-US women estimated by Min. (H) The immediate CIN2+/3+ risk of specific HPV genotype in HPV-positive ASC-US women estimated by Any. (I) The immediate CIN2+/3+ risk of specific HPV genotype in HPV-positive ASC-US women estimated by Hier. ASC-US: atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance; HPV: human papillomavirus; Min.: minimum estimate; Any.: any type estimate; Hier.: hierarchical attribution estimate; CIN: cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Algorithms of risk stratification for specific HPV genotype grouping in ASC-US women. (A) HPV genotype grouping for CIN2+. HPVs that carried the immediate CIN2+ risk above the threshold of colposcopy referral (≥4.0%) were classified into group A, including HPV16, HPV33, HPV31, HPV58, HPV52, HPV35, HPV82, HPV18, HPV39, HPV45 and HPV68. HPVs that carried the immediate CIN2+ risk no more than that of HPV-negative women were group C, including HPV73 and HPV26. And the others were group B, including HPV56, HPV51, HPV66, HPV53 and HPV59. (B) HPV genotype grouping for CIN3+. According to prior studies, HPV18 was still grouped into A by default due to its critical role in cervical cancer and necessity for colposcopy referral. For remaining HPV genotypes, HPVs that carried the immediate CIN3+ risk above the threshold of colposcopy referral were classified into group A, including HPV16, HPV33, HPV35, HPV31, HPV82, HPV52, HPV39 and HPV58. HPVs that carried the immediate CIN3+ risk no more than that of HPV-negative women were group C, including HPV45, HPV53, HPV59, HPV73 and HPV26. And the others were group B, including HPV51, HPV68, HPV66 and HPV56. ASC-US: atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance; HPV: human papillomavirus; Min.: minimum estimate; CIN: cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
The immediate CIN2+/3+ risk of HPV-positive women, three risk-stratified groups, HPV-negative women and total population stratified by age. (A) The age-specific CIN2+ risk of HPV-positive women, three HPV risk groups, HPV-negative women and total population. (B) The age-specific CIN3+ risk of HPV-positive women, three HPV risk groups, HPV-negative women and total population. CIN: cervical intraepithelial neoplasia; HPV: human papillomavirus.

References

    1. Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, et al. . Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021;71(3):209–249. doi: 10.3322/caac.21660. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Li X, Rao X, Wei MJ, et al. . Extended HPV genotyping for risk assessment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2/3 or worse in a cohort study. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2022;20(8):906–914.e10. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2022.7032. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Fu Y, Li Y, Li X, et al. . Risk stratification for cervical precancer and cancer by DH3-HPV partial genotyping and cytology in women attending cervical screening: a retrospective cohort study. J Med Virol. 2023;95(2):e28482. doi: 10.1002/jmv.28482. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Song F, Du H, Xiao A, et al. . Type-specific distribution of cervical hrHPV infection and the association with cytological and histological results in a large population-based cervical cancer screening program: baseline and 3-year longitudinal data. J Cancer. 2020;11(20):6157–6167. doi: 10.7150/jca.48357. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Katki HA, Kinney WK, Fetterman B, et al. . Cervical cancer risk for women undergoing concurrent testing for human papillomavirus and cervical cytology: a population-based study in routine clinical practice. Lancet Oncol. 2011;12(7):663–672. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(11)70145-0. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

MeSH terms