Safety and Feasibility of Robotic Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy With Immediate Direct-to-Implant Reconstruction - Insights From the One of the Largest Centers in Asia
- PMID: 39824711
- DOI: 10.1016/j.clbc.2024.12.013
Safety and Feasibility of Robotic Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy With Immediate Direct-to-Implant Reconstruction - Insights From the One of the Largest Centers in Asia
Abstract
Background: The use of robotic-assisted nipple-sparing mastectomy (R-NSM) with immediate direct-to-implant (DTI) reconstruction in treatment of breast cancer has been a controversial topic. The adoption of robotic surgery in breast cancer treatment has gained traction globally due to its minimally invasive nature, potential for improved cosmetic outcomes and better intraoperative visualization. This study provides insights on safety and feasibility robotic mastectomy at one of the largest centers in Asia.
Methods: This retrospective study included patients who underwent robotic nipple-sparing mastectomy (R-NSM) with immediate direct-to-implant (DTI) reconstruction from April 2018 to September 2024. Our endpoints were mainly focused on perioperative outcomes, patient satisfaction, and oncologic outcomes.
Results: A total of 266 procedures were included in our series, with 233 patients undergoing unilateral R-NSM with either DTI reconstruction or a tissue expander, and 33 patients underwent surgery on both breasts. Postoperative complications were recorded in 11 patients (4.14 %). The median follow-up of this study is 37.2 ± 23.3 months. Locoregional recurrence (LRR) was observed in 6 patients (2.5 %), with isolated skin recurrence being the most common. Distant metastasis was observed in 9 patients (3.86 %). The 3-year overall survival rate was 98.3 %.
Conclusion: Robotic NSM is a safe and feasible novel minimal invasive surgical approach for breast cancer surgery, providing both excellent cosmetic results and oncological outcomes that are noninferior to conventional or endoscopic approaches.
Keywords: Breast cancer surgery; Local recurrence; Patient report outcome; Robot-assisted nipple sparing mastectomy; Robotic mastectomy.
Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Disclosure The datasets generated and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request. The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Similar articles
-
Early Experience of Direct-to-Implant Breast Reconstruction Using Acellular Dermal Matrix after Robot-Assisted Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy.Plast Reconstr Surg. 2024 Sep 1;154(3):512-520. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000011105. Epub 2023 Oct 3. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2024. PMID: 37797243
-
7-step endoscopic nipple-sparing mastectomy with implant-based breast reconstruction: nipple sensation preservation and low complications.World J Surg Oncol. 2025 Jul 22;23(1):292. doi: 10.1186/s12957-025-03935-7. World J Surg Oncol. 2025. PMID: 40696408 Free PMC article.
-
Robotic Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy and Immediate Breast Reconstruction with Gel Implant: Technique, Preliminary Results and Patient-Reported Cosmetic Outcome.Ann Surg Oncol. 2019 Jan;26(1):42-52. doi: 10.1245/s10434-018-6704-2. Epub 2018 Aug 14. Ann Surg Oncol. 2019. PMID: 30109537
-
Robotic nipple-sparing mastectomy: a comparative analysis with conventional and endoscopic techniques through a systematic review.J Robot Surg. 2025 May 16;19(1):220. doi: 10.1007/s11701-025-02388-0. J Robot Surg. 2025. PMID: 40377824 Review.
-
Postoperative complications and surgical outcomes of robotic versus conventional nipple-sparing mastectomy in breast cancer: meta-analysis.Br J Surg. 2024 Jan 3;111(1):znad336. doi: 10.1093/bjs/znad336. Br J Surg. 2024. PMID: 37890072 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous