Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Jan 17;15(1):2234.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-83074-3.

Biochemical failure-free survival of 18F-rhPSMA-7 and 18F-flotufolastat PET-guided salvage radiotherapy for patients with recurrent prostate cancer

Affiliations

Biochemical failure-free survival of 18F-rhPSMA-7 and 18F-flotufolastat PET-guided salvage radiotherapy for patients with recurrent prostate cancer

Marco M E Vogel et al. Sci Rep. .

Abstract

Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-targeted positron emission tomography (PET) has improved localization of prostate cancer (PC) lesions in biochemical recurrence (BCR) for salvage radiotherapy (SRT). We conducted a retrospective review of patients undergoing 18F-rhPSMA-7 or 18F-flotufolastat (18F-rhPSMA-7.3)-PET-guided SRT compared with conventional-SRT (C-SRT) without PET. We evaluated biochemical failure-free survival (bFS) and overall rates of bFS in 110 evaluable patients with recurrent PC after radical prostatectomy who received SRT. 82 patients received 18F-rhPSMA-7/18F-flotufolastat-PET-guided SRT and 28 received C-SRT. Median bFS for patients with 18F-rhPSMA-7/18F-flotufolastat-PET-guided SRT was not reached while median bFS was 45.6 months for patients with C-SRT (p = 0.101). %bFS were 95% (52/55) vs 87% (20/23), 90% (27/30) vs 75% (15/20), 89% (16/18) vs 68% (13/19) and 100% (3/3) vs 57% (8/14) for PET-guided vs C-SRT at 12, 24, 36, and 48 months, respectively. Among patients treated in the prostate bed only, median bFS was not reached for PSMA-PET-guided SRT (n = 52) vs 55.1 months in the C-SRT group (n = 25; p = 0.063). %bFS was greater for PSMA-PET-guided SRT than C-SRT at all evaluated timepoints. 18F-rhPSMA-7/18F-flotufolastat-guided SRT yielded favorable disease outcomes. Although statistical significance was not reached, likely due to the limited sample size in this preliminary analysis, our data illustrate potential for 18F-flotufolastat-PET-guided SRT.

Keywords: 18F-flotufolastat; 18F-rhPSMA-7; PSMA-PET; Prostate cancer; Salvage radiotherapy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations. Competing interests: Matthias Eiber reports fees from Blue Earth Diagnostics Ltd. (consultant, research funding), Novartis/AAA (consultant, speaker), Telix (consultant), Bayer (consultant, research funding), RayzeBio (consultant), Point Biopharma (consultant), Eckert-Ziegler (speaker) and Janssen Pharmaceuticals (consultant, speakers bureau), Parexel (image review) and Bioclinica (image review) outside the submitted work and a patent application for rhPSMA. He and other inventors are entitled to royalties on sales of POSLUMA®. Isabel Rauscher reports research funding and travel support from Blue Earth Diagnostics. All other authors have no conflicts of interest to declare that are relevant to the content of this article.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Patient flow diagram.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
ADT-adjusted Cox regression of biochemical failure-free survival (left) and overall rates of biochemical failure-free survival at 12, 24, 36 and 48 months (right) for 18F-rhPSMA-7/18F-flotufolastat-guided salvage radiotherapy vs conventional salvage radiotherapy.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
ADT-adjusted Cox regression of biochemical failure-free survival (left) and overall rates of biochemical failure-free survival at 12, 24, 36 and 48 months (right) for 18F-flotufolastat-guided salvage radiotherapy vs conventional salvage radiotherapy.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
ADT-adjusted Cox regression of biochemical failure-free survival (left) and overall rates of biochemical failure-free survival at 12, 24, 36 and 48 months (right) for 18F-rhPSMA-7/18F-flotufolastat-guided salvage radiotherapy, vs conventional salvage radiotherapy in a subgroup of patients receiving SRT to the prostate bed only.
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
ADT-adjusted Cox regression of biochemical failure-free survival (left) and overall rates of biochemical failure-free survival at 12, 24, 36 and 48 months (right) for 18F-flotufolastat-guided salvage radiotherapy, vs conventional salvage radiotherapy in a subgroup of patients receiving SRT to the prostate bed only.
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
Example of a patient with 18F-flotufolastat-guided salvage radiotherapy for local recurrence located caudally to the bladder. The Figure shows an axial (A), coronal (B) and sagittal (C) plane of the PET/CT-fusion, PET sequence, and the resulting radiotherapy contouring (red = planning target volume, orange = simultaneous-integrated boost, pink = gross tumor volume).

Similar articles

References

    1. Paller, C. J. & Antonarakis, E. S. Management of biochemically recurrent prostate cancer after local therapy: Evolving standards of care and new directions. Clin. Adv. Hematol. Oncol.11, 14–23 (2013). - PMC - PubMed
    1. Houshmand, S., Lawhn-Heath, C. & Behr, S. PSMA PET imaging in the diagnosis and management of prostate cancer. Abdom. Radiol. (NY)48, 3610–3623. 10.1007/s00261-023-04002-z (2023). - PMC - PubMed
    1. Vogel, M. M. E. et al. Feasibility and outcome of PSMA-PET-based dose-escalated salvage radiotherapy versus conventional salvage radiotherapy for patients with recurrent prostate cancer. Front. Oncol.11, 715020. 10.3389/fonc.2021.715020 (2021). - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wurzer, A. et al. Radiohybrid ligands: A novel tracer concept exemplified by (18)F- or (68)Ga-Labeled rhPSMA inhibitors. J. Nucl. Med. Off. Publ. Soc. Nucl. Med.61, 735–742. 10.2967/jnumed.119.234922 (2020). - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wurzer, A. et al. Preclinical comparison of four [(18)F, (nat)Ga]rhPSMA-7 isomers: Influence of the stereoconfiguration on pharmacokinetics. EJNMMI Res.10, 149. 10.1186/s13550-020-00740-z (2020). - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms