Author Correction: Large-scale benchmarking of circRNA detection tools reveals large differences in sensitivity but not in precision

Marieke Vromman¹, Jasper Anckaert¹, Stefania Bortoluzzi², Alessia Buratin², Chia-Ying Chen³, Qinjie Chu⁴, Trees-Juen Chuang³, Roozbeh Dehghannasiri⁵, Christoph Dieterich⁶, Xin Dong⁷, Paul Flicek⁸, Enrico Gaffo², Wanjun Gu⁹, Chunjiang He⁷, Steve Hoffmann¹⁰, Osagie Izuogu⁸, Michael S Jackson¹¹, Tobias Jakobi¹², Eric C Lai¹³, Justine Nuytens¹, Julia Salzman⁵, Mauro Santibanez-Koref¹¹, Peter Stadler¹⁴, Olivier Thas¹⁵, Eveline Vanden Eynde¹, Kimberly Verniers¹, Guoxia Wen¹⁶, Jakub Westholm¹⁷, Li Yang¹⁸, Chu-Yu Ye⁴, Nurten Yigit¹, Guo-Hua Yuan¹⁹, Jinyang Zhang²⁰, Fangqing Zhao²⁰, Jo Vandesompele²¹, Pieter-Jan Volders¹

Affiliations

¹ OncoRNALab, Cancer Research Institute Ghent (CRIG), Department of Biomolecular Medicine, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
² Department of Molecular Medicine, University of Padova, Padova, Italy.
³ Genomics Research Center, Academia Sinica, Taipei City, Taiwan.
⁴ Institute of Crop Science and Institute of Bioinformatics, Zhejiang University, Zhejiang, China.
⁵ Department of Biomedical Data Science and of Biochemistry, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
⁶ Klaus Tschira Institute for Integrative Computational Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine III, University Hospital Heidelberg, German Center for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Heidelberg, Germany.
⁷ School of Basic Medical Science, Department of Medical Genetics, Wuhan University, Wuhan, China.
⁸ EMBL-EBI, Hinxton, UK.
⁹ Collaborative Innovation Center of Jiangsu Province of Cancer Prevention and Treatment of Chinese Medicine, School of Artificial Intelligence and Information Technology, Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing, China.
¹⁰ Computational Biology Group, Leibniz Institute on Aging - Fritz Lipmann Institute (FLI), Jena, Germany.
¹¹ Biosciences Institute, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle, UK.
¹² Translational Cardiovascular Research Center, University of Arizona - College of Medicine Phoenix, Phoenix, AZ, USA.
¹³ Sloan Kettering Institute, New York, NY, USA.
¹⁴ Bioinformatics Group, Department of Computer Science, and Interdisciplinary Center for Bioinformatics, Universität Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
¹⁵ Data Science Institute, I-Biostat, Hasselt University, Hasselt, Belgium.
¹⁶ State Key Laboratory of Bioelectronics, School of Biological Sciences and Medical Engineering, Southeast University, Nanjing, China.
¹⁷ Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, National Bioinformatics Infrastructure Sweden, Science for Life Laboratory, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden.
¹⁸ Center for Molecular Medicine, Children's Hospital, Fudan University and Shanghai Key Laboratory of Medical Epigenetics, International Laboratory of Medical Epigenetics and Metabolism, Ministry of Science and Technology, Institutes of Biomedical Sciences, Fudan University, Fudan, China.
¹⁹ CAS Key Laboratory of Computational Biology, Shanghai Institute of Nutrition and Health, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, China.
²⁰ Beijing Institutes of Life Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.
²¹ OncoRNALab, Cancer Research Institute Ghent (CRIG), Department of Biomolecular Medicine, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium. jo.vandesompele@ugent.be.

PMID: 39825083
DOI: 10.1038/s41592-024-02569-z

Published Erratum

Author Correction: Large-scale benchmarking of circRNA detection tools reveals large differences in sensitivity but not in precision

Marieke Vromman et al. Nat Methods. 2025 Feb.

. 2025 Feb;22(2):448.

doi: 10.1038/s41592-024-02569-z.

Authors

Affiliations

¹ OncoRNALab, Cancer Research Institute Ghent (CRIG), Department of Biomolecular Medicine, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
² Department of Molecular Medicine, University of Padova, Padova, Italy.
³ Genomics Research Center, Academia Sinica, Taipei City, Taiwan.
⁴ Institute of Crop Science and Institute of Bioinformatics, Zhejiang University, Zhejiang, China.
⁵ Department of Biomedical Data Science and of Biochemistry, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
⁶ Klaus Tschira Institute for Integrative Computational Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine III, University Hospital Heidelberg, German Center for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Heidelberg, Germany.
⁷ School of Basic Medical Science, Department of Medical Genetics, Wuhan University, Wuhan, China.
⁸ EMBL-EBI, Hinxton, UK.
⁹ Collaborative Innovation Center of Jiangsu Province of Cancer Prevention and Treatment of Chinese Medicine, School of Artificial Intelligence and Information Technology, Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing, China.
¹⁰ Computational Biology Group, Leibniz Institute on Aging - Fritz Lipmann Institute (FLI), Jena, Germany.
¹¹ Biosciences Institute, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle, UK.
¹² Translational Cardiovascular Research Center, University of Arizona - College of Medicine Phoenix, Phoenix, AZ, USA.
¹³ Sloan Kettering Institute, New York, NY, USA.
¹⁴ Bioinformatics Group, Department of Computer Science, and Interdisciplinary Center for Bioinformatics, Universität Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
¹⁵ Data Science Institute, I-Biostat, Hasselt University, Hasselt, Belgium.
¹⁶ State Key Laboratory of Bioelectronics, School of Biological Sciences and Medical Engineering, Southeast University, Nanjing, China.
¹⁷ Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, National Bioinformatics Infrastructure Sweden, Science for Life Laboratory, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden.
¹⁸ Center for Molecular Medicine, Children's Hospital, Fudan University and Shanghai Key Laboratory of Medical Epigenetics, International Laboratory of Medical Epigenetics and Metabolism, Ministry of Science and Technology, Institutes of Biomedical Sciences, Fudan University, Fudan, China.
¹⁹ CAS Key Laboratory of Computational Biology, Shanghai Institute of Nutrition and Health, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, China.
²⁰ Beijing Institutes of Life Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.
²¹ OncoRNALab, Cancer Research Institute Ghent (CRIG), Department of Biomolecular Medicine, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium. jo.vandesompele@ugent.be.

PMID: 39825083
DOI: 10.1038/s41592-024-02569-z

No abstract available

PubMed Disclaimer

Erratum for

Large-scale benchmarking of circRNA detection tools reveals large differences in sensitivity but not in precision.
Vromman M, Anckaert J, Bortoluzzi S, Buratin A, Chen CY, Chu Q, Chuang TJ, Dehghannasiri R, Dieterich C, Dong X, Flicek P, Gaffo E, Gu W, He C, Hoffmann S, Izuogu O, Jackson MS, Jakobi T, Lai EC, Nuytens J, Salzman J, Santibanez-Koref M, Stadler P, Thas O, Vanden Eynde E, Verniers K, Wen G, Westholm J, Yang L, Ye CY, Yigit N, Yuan GH, Zhang J, Zhao F, Vandesompele J, Volders PJ. Vromman M, et al. Nat Methods. 2023 Aug;20(8):1159-1169. doi: 10.1038/s41592-023-01944-6. Epub 2023 Jul 13. Nat Methods. 2023. PMID: 37443337 Free PMC article.

Publication types

Actions

LinkOut - more resources

Full Text Sources
- Nature Publishing Group

Save citation to file

Email citation

Add to Collections

Add to My Bibliography

Your saved search

Create a file for external citation management software

Your RSS Feed

Author Correction: Large-scale benchmarking of circRNA detection tools reveals large differences in sensitivity but not in precision

Affiliations

Author Correction: Large-scale benchmarking of circRNA detection tools reveals large differences in sensitivity but not in precision

Authors

Affiliations

Erratum for

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources

Full Text Sources