Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2025 Jan 15;29(1):27.
doi: 10.1186/s13054-024-05237-y.

Individualized PEEP titration by lung compliance during one-lung ventilation: a meta-analysis

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Individualized PEEP titration by lung compliance during one-lung ventilation: a meta-analysis

Wan-Jie Gu et al. Crit Care. .

Abstract

Background: Despite the physiological advantages of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP), its optimal utilization during one-lung ventilation (OLV) remains uncertain. We aimed to investigate whether individualized PEEP titration by lung compliance is associated with a reduced risk of postoperative pulmonary complications during OLV.

Methods: We searched PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials until April 1, 2024, to identify published randomized controlled trials that compared individualized PEEP titration by lung compliance with fixed PEEP during OLV. The primary outcome was a composite of postoperative pulmonary complications. Secondary outcomes included clinical outcomes (pneumonia, atelectasis, ARDS, cardiovascular complications, mortality), respiratory mechanics, gas exchanges, and hemodynamic variables. Subgroup analyses were conducted for the primary outcome according to the PEEP titration method (dynamic compliance vs. driving pressure/static compliance, stepwise decremental vs. incremental strategy).

Results: Ten trials involving 3426 patients were included. Compared with fixed PEEP, individualized PEEP titration by lung compliance was associated with reduced risk of a composite of postoperative pulmonary complications (eight trials, 3351 patients, risk ratio [RR] 0.55, 95% CI 0.38-0.78). Subgroup analyses suggested the association was evident in the subgroup with titration by dynamic compliance rather than driving pressure/static compliance and in the subgroup with PEEP titration by stepwise decremental but not stepwise incremental strategy. Individualized PEEP titration by lung compliance was also associated with a reduced risk of pneumonia (RR 0.71, 95% CI 0.52-0.96) and atelectasis (RR 0.63, 95% CI 0.45-0.88), higher dynamic compliance, PaO2, PaO2/FiO2, and lower driving pressure. The individualized and fixed PEEP groups did not differ in ARDS, cardiovascular complications, mortality, peak pressure, plateau pressure, PaCO2, heart rate, and mean arterial pressure.

Conclusions: Compared with fixed PEEP, individualized PEEP titration by lung compliance is associated with a reduced risk of postoperative pulmonary complications during OLV, especially in PEEP titration by dynamic compliance or stepwise decremental strategy. It improves respiratory mechanics and oxygenation with no difference in hemodynamic variables. Trial registration number ClinicalTrials.gov (PROSPERO No. CRD42024529980).

Keywords: Lung compliance; One-lung ventilation; Positive end-expiratory pressure; Postoperative pulmonary complications; Respiratory mechanics.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations. Ethics approval and consent to participate: Not applicable. Consent for publication: Not applicable. Competing interests: The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Forest plot for a composite of postoperative pulmonary complications, pneumonia, and atelectasis. CI, confidence interval; PEEP, positive end-expiration pressure
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Forest plot for ARDS, cardiovascular complications, and mortality. ARDS, acute respiratory distress syndrome; CI, confidence interval; PEEP, positive end-expiration pressure
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Forest plot for respiratory mechanics. CI, confidence interval; PEEP, positive end-expiration pressure; SD, standard deviation
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Forest plot for gas exchanges. CI, confidence interval; FiO2, inspired oxygen concentration; PaCO2, arterial partial pressure of carbon dioxide; PaO2, arterial partial pressure of oxygen; PEEP, positive end-expiration pressure; SD, standard deviation

References

    1. Lohser J, Slinger P. Lung injury after one-lung ventilation: a review of the pathophysiologic mechanisms affecting the ventilated and the collapsed lung. Anesth Analg. 2015;121:302–18. - PubMed
    1. Serpa Neto A, Hemmes SN, Barbas CS, et al. Incidence of mortality and morbidity related to postoperative lung injury in patients who have undergone abdominal or thoracic surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Respir Med. 2014;2:1007–15. - PubMed
    1. Miskovic A, Lumb AB. Postoperative pulmonary complications. Br J Anaesth. 2017;118:317–34. - PubMed
    1. O’Gara B, Talmor D. Perioperative lung protective ventilation. BMJ. 2018;362: k3030. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Peel JK, Funk DJ, Slinger P, Srinathan S, Kidane B. Positive end-expiratory pressure and recruitment maneuvers during one-lung ventilation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2020;160:1112–22. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources